🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <2734@aegis.or.jp> davidg@aegis.or.jp (Dave McLane) writes:
    >>
    >>>If that law does not work enough in the United States,
    >>>such a law never work to reduce prejudice in Japan.
    >>
    >>I just came on a copy of the U.N. Universal Declartion of Human
    >>Right. If ideas presented there were fully implemented, things
    >>would indeed be very different but, in fact, they aren't. I'm not
    >>denying the need for human rights, I'm just saying it's an
    >>implementation problem, not a design problem. 
    >>
Yes, it is an implementation problem; but my point was:
Implementing methods are a lot different in U.S. and in Japan;
that will make many foreigners feel difficult to survive in Japan.

The method difference is:

In U.S. society, people tends to pass the human rights law (design) first
and then implement the rights.  They believe in law.

While, in Japanese society, people tends to try to implement human rights
not relying on the law; no one believes in law.
People does not try to establish the design on paper;
but try to have an agreement by many men as a common idea.
It is sometimes called the atmosphere or the AIR of the society.
It is a too long story and I will discuss the AIR another time.

Any way, Western way of approach sometimes does not solve the problem.

# By the way Dave,
# I feel that your way of life is very Japanese; if you do not mind.
# Would you express the same opinion if you were discussing in U.S.?

--
		$@%"%s%j%D!J3t!K8&5f=j!!Bh#38&5fIt(J
			$@0p3@?5B@O:!!(Jinagaki@aclab1.resrch.anritsu.co.jp