🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <2184@aegis.or.jp> davidg@aegis.or.jp (Dave McLane) writes:
 >! Except for fj.news.group and fj.misc I don't think I've ever posted
 >! to an fj.xxxx group. Why is that? Well, as recommended in
 >! news.accounce.newusers, I don't just jump in and post to *any*
 >! newsgroup. Instead, I read it for a while to see what people are
 >! saying.... Since I didn't see anything in other than Japanese (which
 >! unfortunately I don't understand) I didn't post anything. 

  Thank you for your commnent. I'm one who asked you why not post to
other fj groups. (But, believe me, I never say 'how many times' in
original Japanese postings.) I understand your situation and I also
hear from those who can read more or less Japanese.

  But when you have some questions on a certain Japanese things,
please don't hesitate to post other fj groups. Of cource, there are
some Japanese who dare not to read English articles, but IMHO, any
questions and other articles shall be (also) posted to proper
newsgroups to get more proper answers.

  As you may already know, some complains that there are too many
English articles in fj.misc, and some of which have any relations in
both foreigners and miscellaneous subjects. It sounds very reasonable
for me and I myself spend a lot of time to dig your article out from
many ones on making the new newsgroup.

And it's too easy for such Latin-alphabet-distasters to distinguish
English and Japanese articles than to distinguish Swedish and
Norwegian. :-)

P.S. Sorry, I can't responed to you till about 8/8.
--
Hidekazu TOZAKI
Faculty of Science and Technology, Keio University, Yokohama, Japan.
E-mail: tozaki@nak.math.keio.ac.jp