Thread View: fj.rec.bicycle
19 messages
19 total messages
Started by Jeffrey S. Childress
Sun, 20 Jul 1997 00:00
What constitutes a good set of rollers?
Author: Jeffrey S. Childress
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 1997 00:00
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 1997 00:00
28 lines
2008 bytes
2008 bytes
If I were to buy a set of rollers, what should I look for? Being an ex-engineer, I don't care so much about what brand to buy but about what makes one set of rollers better than another. For example: Does the width of the rollers matter? Does the diameter of the rollers matter? Does the material the rollers are made from matter? Is there a particular configuration that is better than another (I heard there is a set with two small rollers up front)? Is there a reason why I should avoid rollers in favor of a stationary bike or turbo-trainer? Also, I know very few people that ride rollers and that surprises me (no comments regarding my social life please....I acknowledge there could be millions of rollers out there and my social life is just that bad). Nevertheless, that begs the question: how many rollers are sold annually compared to stationary bikes and turbo-trainers? Anyone know where I could go to satisfy my curiousity?. Thanks....Jeff C.
Re: What constitutes a good set of rollers?
Author: Tom Ace
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 1997 00:00
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 1997 00:00
26 lines
1734 bytes
1734 bytes
Jeffrey S. Childress wrote: > > If I were to buy a set of rollers, what should I look for? > Being an ex-engineer, I don't care so much about what brand > to buy but about what makes one set of rollers better than > another. The one complaint I had about mine was that the rollers weren't cylindrical enough. That is, too much vibration was generated due to imperfections in the rollers' surfaces. I don't know enough about rollers to say which types of construction are more or less likely to exhibit this flaw. > Is there a reason why I should avoid rollers in favor of > a stationary bike or turbo-trainer? I wanted rollers because I preferred to have to concentrate on balance. (A matter of personal taste.) I found that riding rollers taught me things about balance that years of road riding had not. Tom Ace crux@best.com
Re: What constitutes a good set of rollers?
Author: John Forrest Tomlinson
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 1997 00:00
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 1997 00:00
14 lines
1266 bytes
1266 bytes
In <5qs3tl$smh@camel12.mindspring.com> jschildress@mindspring.com (Jeffrey S. Childress) writes: > >If I were to buy a set of rollers, what should I look for? Being an >ex-engineer, I don't care so much about what brand to buy but about >what makes one set of rollers better than another. For example: > >Does the width of the rollers matter? > Real studs ride narrow rollers. JT
Re: What constitutes a good set of rollers?
Author: Dr Goatlips
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 1997 00:00
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 1997 00:00
40 lines
2453 bytes
2453 bytes
Jeffrey S. Childress wrote: > > If I were to buy a set of rollers, what should I look for? Being an > ex-engineer, I don't care so much about what brand to buy but about > what makes one set of rollers better than another. For example: > > Does the width of the rollers matter? > > Does the diameter of the rollers matter? > > Does the material the rollers are made from matter? > > Is there a particular configuration that is better than another (I > heard there is a set with two small rollers up front)? > > Is there a reason why I should avoid rollers in favor of a stationary > bike or turbo-trainer? > > Also, I know very few people that ride rollers and that surprises me > (no comments regarding my social life please....I acknowledge there > could be millions of rollers out there and my social life is just that > bad). Nevertheless, that begs the question: how many rollers are > sold annually compared to stationary bikes and turbo-trainers? Anyone > know where I could go to satisfy my curiousity?. > > Thanks....Jeff C. A good set of rollers? I'd say Paolla Pezzo is the benchmark for that. But seriously... You can simply not buy better rollers than Krietler. They cost more but are (by popular, but not unanimous, R.B.R opinion) well worth it if you plan to ride them much. I'll pass on the resistance questions because I am such a phillistine that I rigged a Performance magnetic unit to my Kreitlers. Good luck
Re: What constitutes a good set of rollers?
Author: Tom James
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 1997 00:00
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 1997 00:00
37 lines
2859 bytes
2859 bytes
> Jeffrey S. Childress wrote: > > > > If I were to buy a set of rollers, what should I look for? Being an > > ex-engineer, I don't care so much about what brand to buy but about > > what makes one set of rollers better than another. For example: (snip) > > Is there a reason why I should avoid rollers in favor of a stationary > > bike or turbo-trainer? They train rather different things. A turbo trainer, because you can set the resistance, is good for doing high intensity stuff in a controlled and repeatable manner. With rollers, on the other hand, if you are reasonably fit, you can reach the fastest pedalling speed that you consider safe on your highest gear without having reached your highest level of effort. So you can't really use them for extreme efforts. On the other hand, they are very good for developing a smooth pedalling style (second only to riding fixed, IMHO) and also promote good balance. Additionally, because there is a modicum of concentration required to stay upright, I find them less mind numbing to ride for extended periods which is a Godsend if you come from somewhere where the weather is too bad to train outdoors for part of the year. So in an ideal world you'd need both! One other advantage of rollers over a turbo trainer is that it is less damaging to the bike, since the bottom bracket and rear hub aren't clamped, so they can twist in the normal way; that is, the stresses are no worse than when riding normally. The main damage (with rollers, but also with a turbo) is with sweat dripping down onto your stem/headset/gear levers, leading to corrosion, since without any airflow, it just drips down instead of evaporating. You can alleviate this problem by covering this area with a small towel or a piece of rag. Tom
Re: What constitutes a good set of rollers?
Author: JimWilson
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 1997 00:00
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 1997 00:00
30 lines
2195 bytes
2195 bytes
Jeffrey S. Childress wrote: > > If I were to buy a set of rollers, what should I look for? Being an > ex-engineer, I don't care so much about what brand to buy but about > what makes one set of rollers better than another. For example: > > Does the width of the rollers matter? > > Does the diameter of the rollers matter? > > Does the material the rollers are made from matter? > > Is there a particular configuration that is better than another (I > heard there is a set with two small rollers up front)? > > Is there a reason why I should avoid rollers in favor of a stationary > bike or turbo-trainer? > > Also, I know very few people that ride rollers and that surprises me > (no comments regarding my social life please....I acknowledge there > could be millions of rollers out there and my social life is just that > bad). Nevertheless, that begs the question: how many rollers are > sold annually compared to stationary bikes and turbo-trainers? Anyone > know where I could go to satisfy my curiousity?. > > Thanks....Jeff C.Hey, how about Minoura's tri-fold set w/ carrying bag and resistance unit compared to the Krietel challenge set w/ their fan unit? we're talkin' $199 compared to around $400... any suggestions?
Re: What constitutes a good set of rollers?
Author: Garry Lee
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 1997 00:00
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 1997 00:00
3 lines
1067 bytes
1067 bytes
The only good set of rollers, turbo trainer etc. is a dead set. There is nothing more calculated to put people off cycling for life.
Re: What constitutes a good set of rollers?
Author: Al Castro
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 1997 00:00
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 1997 00:00
23 lines
2049 bytes
2049 bytes
Jeffrey S. Childress <jschildress@mindspring.com> wrote in article <5qs3tl$smh@camel12.mindspring.com>... > If I were to buy a set of rollers, what should I look for? Being an > ex-engineer, I don't care so much about what brand to buy but about > what makes one set of rollers better than another. For example: > > Does the width of the rollers matter? > > Does the diameter of the rollers matter? > > Does the material the rollers are made from matter? > I have a set of Kreitler Dyno-Lite's which have small diameter rollers (3 inch I think) which are supposed to increase peddling resistance without attaching a magnetic or fan unit. They are great rollers, give an excellent workout, and worth every penny -- but I'm selling them if you're interested. For some reason, I can do a century on my road bike with no problems at all; I go on the rollers for 10 minutes and my penis gets numb for the next 10 minutes or so. After that article in Bicycling about impotence, I decided not to take my chances and sell them. I rather buy good winter gear and hit the road in the wintertime.
Re: What constitutes a good set of rollers?
Author: Chris Phillipo
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 1997 00:00
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 1997 00:00
13 lines
1545 bytes
1545 bytes
In message <5qur59$hke$1@nuacht.iol.ie> - Garry Lee <glee@iol.ie>21 Jul 1997 05:13:13 GMT writes: :> :>The only good set of rollers, turbo trainer etc. is a dead set. :>There is nothing more calculated to put people off cycling for life. I second that, although I still ride mine when weather doesn't permit. ___________________________________________ Chris Phillipo - webmaster@tread.pair.com TREAD Publications - TREAD Online! Cycle Magazine. http://www.tread.pair.com/ - http://www.tread.pair.com/bikemag/
Re: What constitutes a good set of rollers?
Author: Tom Lawrence
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 1997 00:00
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 1997 00:00
18 lines
2000 bytes
2000 bytes
In article <Pine.A32.3.91.970720162605.15628A-100000@chem1.usc.edu> Tom James <tomjames@chem1.usc.edu> writes: With rollers, on the other hand, if you are reasonably fit, you can reach the fastest pedalling speed that you consider safe on your highest gear without having reached your highest level of effort. So you can't really use them for extreme efforts. I disagree. I am reasonably fit and I can easily max out on my rollers with no resistance unit. I've gotten my heart rate up to 200 many a time at speeds of only about 35-40 mph. In an all out sprint I can get to 55 mph, so I'm nowhere near hitting the limit. I've never crashed doing this, although my control diminishes dramatically when the cadence goes above 140 or so and by the time I hit 160 I'm all set to launch myself into the next room. But of course doing this trains your ability to control the bike as well as your strength, so it is actually useful to do.
Re: What constitutes a good set of rollers?
Author: Jeffrey S. Childress
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 1997 00:00
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 1997 00:00
33 lines
2554 bytes
2554 bytes
"Al Castro" <acastro@tigerinfo.com> wrote: >Jeffrey S. Childress <jschildress@mindspring.com> wrote in article ><5qs3tl$smh@camel12.mindspring.com>... >> If I were to buy a set of rollers, what should I look for? Being an >> ex-engineer, I don't care so much about what brand to buy but about >> what makes one set of rollers better than another. For example: >> >> Does the width of the rollers matter? >> >> Does the diameter of the rollers matter? >> >> Does the material the rollers are made from matter? >> >I have a set of Kreitler Dyno-Lite's which have small diameter rollers (3 >inch I think) which are supposed to increase peddling resistance without >attaching a magnetic or fan unit. They are great rollers, give an >excellent workout, and worth every penny -- but I'm selling them if you're >interested. For some reason, I can do a century on my road bike with no >problems at all; I go on the rollers for 10 minutes and my penis gets numb >for the next 10 minutes or so. After that article in Bicycling about >impotence, I decided not to take my chances and sell them. I rather buy >good winter gear and hit the road in the wintertime. Thanks, but I'll pass, for now. You know, when I have ridden rollers I haven't had the same problem BUT it does seem harder on the entire crotch area for some reason. I wonder if it's because you tend to stay a little more stationary in the saddle then when you are on the road.
Re: What constitutes a good set of rollers?
Author: Michael J. Stevens
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 1997 00:00
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 1997 00:00
27 lines
1934 bytes
1934 bytes
> If I were to buy a set of rollers, what should I look for? > Thanks....Jeff C. Jeff, I happen to be working on an engineering project that uses rollers. I have just also read the entire thread on your initial post. Here's my humble opinion. 1. You can't get better rollers than Kreitler. 2. Minoura rollers are good for about 2 years of heavy use. (I've gone throug a set in a year) 3. I have used Kreitler for about 10 years and the best ones are the solid aluminum (not the PVC caps) The PVC caps, Challenger Rollers by Kreitler, are much better than anything else on the market... except the better Kreitlers. 4. Spend your money once. Get a set of Kreitlers. Michael J. Stevens (Samrott) Remove the "SPAM" above to reply <mhesteve@mindspring.com> Visit Samrott's Homepage <http://www.mindspring.com/~mhesteve/samrott.html> The fear of the LORD is the instruction for wisdom, And before honor comes humility. Proverbs 15:33
Re: What constitutes a good set of rollers?
Author: Fyodor Dostoyfredsky
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 1997 00:00
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 1997 00:00
19 lines
1862 bytes
1862 bytes
Garry Lee (glee@iol.ie) wrote: : The only good set of rollers, turbo trainer etc. is a dead set. : There is nothing more calculated to put people off cycling for life. I don't think anyone will argue that using rollers & wind trainers are not much fun. But a good way to get the benefits of the acute sense of balance that rollers provide is warming up for a race, especially criteriums. Urban areas aren't very good for warming up, and if you use rollers for 30-45 minutes before every race, after a year or two or three you'll find that your balance and ability to steer from the hips has improved tremendously without much mental effort at all. cheers, Henry fredly@connectnet.com
Re: What constitutes a good set of rollers?
Author: Chris Phillipo
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 1997 00:00
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 1997 00:00
25 lines
2432 bytes
2432 bytes
:>reasonably fit, you can reach the fastest pedalling speed that you :>consider safe on your highest gear without having reached your highest :>level of effort. So you can't really use them for extreme efforts. On the :>other hand, they are very good for developing a smooth pedalling style :>(second only to riding fixed, IMHO) and also promote good balance. :>Additionally, because there is a modicum of concentration required to :>stay upright, I find them less mind numbing to ride for extended periods :>which is a Godsend if you come from somewhere where the weather is too :>bad to train outdoors for part of the year. So in an ideal world you'd :>need both! If you look around, you'll also find rollers with resistance units, the best of both worlds. I would suggest the widest rollers you can get, I find my to be narrow, and once I become somewhat fatigued, I start to drift one or two inches either way, it's not much further than that to the end of the roller and onto the floor :( Also, mine are a bit too short wheel base wise, so any steering input is magnified, know your wheel base and the wheel base the rollers accept before buying. ___________________________________________ Chris Phillipo - webmaster@tread.pair.com TREAD Publications - TREAD Online! Cycle Magazine. http://www.tread.pair.com/ - http://www.tread.pair.com/bikemag/
Re: What constitutes a good set of rollers?
Author: Jeffrey S. Childress
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 1997 00:00
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 1997 00:00
36 lines
2879 bytes
2879 bytes
webmaster@tread.pair.com (Chris Phillipo) wrote: What is the proper roller dimension given your bike's wheelbase. I have heard the front axle should rest straight above the axis of the front roller. I have heard one person say the front axle should rest 1/4" behind the center of the front roller. Which is it? >:>reasonably fit, you can reach the fastest pedalling speed that you >:>consider safe on your highest gear without having reached your highest >:>level of effort. So you can't really use them for extreme efforts. On the >:>other hand, they are very good for developing a smooth pedalling style >:>(second only to riding fixed, IMHO) and also promote good balance. >:>Additionally, because there is a modicum of concentration required to >:>stay upright, I find them less mind numbing to ride for extended periods >:>which is a Godsend if you come from somewhere where the weather is too >:>bad to train outdoors for part of the year. So in an ideal world you'd >:>need both! >If you look around, you'll also find rollers with resistance units, the best >of both worlds. I would suggest the widest rollers you can get, I find my to >be narrow, and once I become somewhat fatigued, I start to drift one or two >inches either way, it's not much further than that to the end of the roller >and onto the floor :( Also, mine are a bit too short wheel base wise, so any >steering input is magnified, know your wheel base and the wheel base the >rollers accept before buying. >___________________________________________ >Chris Phillipo - webmaster@tread.pair.com >TREAD Publications - TREAD Online! Cycle Magazine. >http://www.tread.pair.com/ - http://www.tread.pair.com/bikemag/
Re: What constitutes a good set of rollers?
Author: Tim Lucia
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 1997 00:00
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 1997 00:00
24 lines
2096 bytes
2096 bytes
Chris Phillipo wrote: > of both worlds. I would suggest the widest rollers you can get, I find my to > be narrow, and once I become somewhat fatigued, I start to drift one or two > inches either way, it's not much further than that to the end of the roller > and onto the floor :( Also, mine are a bit too short wheel base wise, so any > steering input is magnified, know your wheel base and the wheel base the > rollers accept before buying. What?? They are not adjustable, wheel-base wise? Well this consitutes a BAD SET of rollers. Make sure the ones you buy are adjustable. They also come in two widths, I believe. Standard (15") and "hot-dog" (9") but I think only one company offers the hot-dogs. Fatigue-induced drifting may explain all those late-in-the-race crashes, eh? Tim -- Timothy J. Lucia Phone: (508) 442-0477 Sun Microsystems Computer Company Fax: (508) 442-1646 Five Omni Way Ms UCHL05-104 E-mail: timothy.lucia@east.sun.com Chelmsford, MA 01824 Pedal faster!
Re: What constitutes a good set of rollers?
Author: Jeffrey S. Childress
Date: Fri, 01 Aug 1997 00:00
Date: Fri, 01 Aug 1997 00:00
29 lines
2394 bytes
2394 bytes
Tim Lucia <timothy.lucia@east.sun.com.NOSPAM> wrote: >Chris Phillipo wrote: >> of both worlds. I would suggest the widest rollers you can get, I find my to >> be narrow, and once I become somewhat fatigued, I start to drift one or two >> inches either way, it's not much further than that to the end of the roller >> and onto the floor :( Also, mine are a bit too short wheel base wise, so any >> steering input is magnified, know your wheel base and the wheel base the >> rollers accept before buying. >What?? They are not adjustable, wheel-base wise? Well this consitutes a >BAD SET of rollers. Make sure the ones you buy are adjustable. They >also come in two widths, I believe. Standard (15") and "hot-dog" (9") >but I think only one company offers the hot-dogs. >Fatigue-induced drifting may explain all those late-in-the-race crashes, >eh? >Tim >-- >Timothy J. Lucia Phone: (508) 442-0477 >Sun Microsystems Computer Company Fax: (508) 442-1646 >Five Omni Way Ms UCHL05-104 E-mail: timothy.lucia@east.sun.com >Chelmsford, MA 01824 Pedal faster! Didn't say they weren't adjustable....said I was too ignorant to know how to adjust them!
Re: What constitutes a good set of rollers?
Author: Chris Phillipo
Date: Fri, 01 Aug 1997 00:00
Date: Fri, 01 Aug 1997 00:00
28 lines
2489 bytes
2489 bytes
In message <5rrkq6$38p@camel4.mindspring.com> - jschildress@mindspring.com (Jeffrey S. Childress)Fri, 01 Aug 1997 03:03:53 GMT writes: :> :>Tim Lucia <timothy.lucia@east.sun.com.NOSPAM> wrote: :> :>>Chris Phillipo wrote: :>>> of both worlds. I would suggest the widest rollers you can get, I find my to :>>> be narrow, and once I become somewhat fatigued, I start to drift one or two :>>> inches either way, it's not much further than that to the end of the roller :>>> and onto the floor :( Also, mine are a bit too short wheel base wise, so any :>>> steering input is magnified, know your wheel base and the wheel base the :>>> rollers accept before buying. :> :>>What?? They are not adjustable, wheel-base wise? Well this consitutes a :>>BAD SET of rollers. Make sure the ones you buy are adjustable. They :>>also come in two widths, I believe. Standard (15") and "hot-dog" (9") :>>but I think only one company offers the hot-dogs. :> Of course they are adjustable. They have five settings, that doesn't mean that your bike won't be out of the range of these settings. Especially a touring bike. ___________________________________________ Chris Phillipo - webmaster@tread.pair.com TREAD Publications - TREAD Online! Cycle Magazine. <07-30-97> http://www.tread.pair.com/ - http://www.tread.pair.com/bikemag/
Re: What constitutes a good set of rollers?
Author: Rink E. Dinkus
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 1997 00:00
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 1997 00:00
12 lines
1528 bytes
1528 bytes
In article <5qur59$hke$1@nuacht.iol.ie>, Garry Lee <glee@iol.ie> wrote: > The only good set of rollers, turbo trainer etc. is a dead set. > There is nothing more calculated to put people off cycling for life. garry: off topic, i know, but thanks again. i'm gonna get as "easy seat" and see what happens. thanks again. pcl btw-a good set of rollers are quiet, stable and secure, with a bracket for gripping the seatpost so you dont go thru the wall (these things have been known to happen)!
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads