🚀 go-pugleaf

"shuji matsuda" <shuji__matsuda@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:br79ar$49ci$1@ID-37799.news.uni-berlin.de...
> In article <br4sdq$tti$1@news-est.ocn.ad.jp>,
> v（^-^）v～♪♭ <whiteboard21@carrot.ocn.ne.jp> wrote:

>   "good or wrong" is better than "right or wrong"
>
> と言っておきながら、次は
>
>    "right or bad" と"good or wrong"
>
> の話をbecauseで結ぶ所。論理が一貫できないのでしょうか？
>
> :                  IT'S A SENSE !
>
> なるほどねえ。


Yes !　Yes !　Yes !　Yes !

  " IT'S  A  SENSE ! "

Your NARROW SENSE consists in where you think or consider with the 
EXTERNAL GIVEN MEANING (in Japanese) and but with the INTERNAL 
FROM -THE - FIRST MEANING (in nature). Shortly this is the proof that
aufully you lack ability to think or consider . And now the SILLY AND 
STUPID THINGS have been told by you shamelessly.

I'm afraid the following confession by me is too late by now. The fact is
this. "Right to wrong and good to bad " are known to everybody already 
at least as a word or in "Japanese JYUKEN". But actually it never is .
And I cast my FISHING LINE with THE BITE and as expected you have 
pulled it and just bitten more than you can chew with a triumphant air.

Ultimately your too many words are never advisable for me this time 
as long as you can't answer the third of my following question mach 
with your claiming to others:

  " What is the purpose of talking about GOOD OR WRONG English ? "

Many and many times I would say that no one can precisely tell "bad "
or "right" to others negatively but affirmatively.  More I would say , 
"In English to make ourselves understood somehow or other is just
important . And except for which ANYTHING WILL DO ! "

  " YOU  ARE  SILLY AND STUPID STILL MORE  HARMFUL ! "

--
v(^-^)v~pupu !


v(^-^)v~pupu ! さん、ミスがあったから直してあげたね。おっほほほ。

--
桃の木あっこですた