Thread View: fj.sci.physics
1 messages
1 total messages
Started by Takashi Ichihara
Sat, 08 Aug 1992 03:01
WHAT'S NEW, Friday, 7 August 1992
Author: Takashi Ichihara
Date: Sat, 08 Aug 1992 03:01
Date: Sat, 08 Aug 1992 03:01
62 lines
3951 bytes
3951 bytes
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 92 13:37:55 PDT To: ichihara@rikvax.riken.go.jp From: "Janice Smith" <VP.APS@STANFORD.BITNET> Subject: What's New for August 7, 1992 WHAT'S NEW, Friday, 7 August 1992 Washington, DC 1. SENATE OVERWHELMINGLY APPROVES SSC AS DEFICIT ISSUE SUBSIDES. The deficit hasn't shrunk, but it seems to have declined as an issue; maybe it's just that Ross Perot is out of the race. By a vote of 62 to 32, the Senate rejected the Bumpers amendment to delete the SSC from the Energy and Water Appropriations Bill. A second Bumpers amendment to make support for the SSC contingent on international commitments fell by the same margin. Sen. Boren (D-OK) predicted that the SSC "...will revolutionize the computer industry, the medical community, and transform our industrial and technological base. Economic opportunities never anticipated will arise, scientific advancements never predicted will proceed, and educational worlds never explored will emerge." All this, he said, even if the scientific goals are not met! Sen. Gramm (D-TX) drawled, "I doubt if there is a Member of the Senate who really understands what the SSC is all about." As if to prove his point, he claimed that, "Between 20 and 30 percent of the gross national product of the United States comes from high-energy physics." In the House, which is expected to reconsider the SSC following the August break, prospects are much brighter than they were in June. 2. SENATE JOINS HOUSE IN CALL FOR SUSPENSION OF NUCLEAR TESTING. The House had already voted to cut off money for testing for one year. Monday, the Senate, which had always blocked test limits, voted to suspend tests through June 93, in spite of a veto threat by President Bush who called for six tests in FY 93. But scien- tists who would have welcomed a total ban a few years ago are now ambivalent. In 1990, the Drell panel concluded that "unintended nuclear detonations present a greater risk than previously esti- mated." In March, Drell testified that some safety measures can be taken without testing, such as retiring older weapons, but to design safer weapons, testing is needed. Beginning in July 93, the Senate measure would allow limited tests for reliability and safety for three years, followed by a total ban after Sept. 96. 3. SENATE VA/HUD/IA APPROPRIATIONS BILL CASTS A CLOUD OVER NSF! Never mind the numbers; NSF would be directed to shift its focus toward industrial support. The Appropriations Committee approved the bill last Friday (WN 31 Jul 92). Language in the report calls on the Foundation to take a "more activist role in transferring the results of basic research to the market place." NSF is told to open up applied research programs to industry and tailor its education programs to industry's needs. But to divert scarce research funds to industry--at the very time Congress is intent on shrinking the NSF research budget--would have a devastating effect on academic research, which is already pretty shaky. The bill could be voted on by the full Senate as early as Monday. 4. CORRECTION: SEN. DOMENICI (R-NM) SUPPORTS LAMPF AS A CIVILIAN FACILITY. According to his office, he had no hand in the shift of funding to defense accounts, as implied in WHAT'S NEW 24 July 93. Robert L. Park (202) 662-8700 The American Physical Society . To: WHATSNEW(Personal Dist. List)
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads