🚀 go-pugleaf

fj.sources.d $B$N5-;v(B <RT.92Dec19154704@tsubame.sone.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp> $B$G(B
 rt@sone.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp (TAKAGI 'RT' Ryo) $B$5$s$O!'(B

:> In article <S91M801.92Dec19114912@ipckus.kansai-u.ac.jp>
:>  s91m801@kansai-u.ac.jp (Marone / Takashi Murase) writes:
:> 
:>  |$B$G!":#F|$O(B MH-6.8 $B$,=P$?$H$$$&$3$H$G!"$=$N4A;zBP1~$N%Q(B$B%C%A$N(B
:>  |Time Zone $B$K$D$$$F$NOC$J$N$G$9$,!"(Bzotnet/tws/dtime.c $B$N(B
:>  |$B%Q%C%A$O!"<!$N$h$&$G$J$$$H(B Date: $B%U%#!<%k%I$N(B Time Zone $B$,(B
:>  |JST $B$K$J$i$:$K!"(B+0900 $B$K$J$k$N$G$O$J$$$G$7$g$&$+!)(B
:> 
:>   $BKM$O!"(BNTT $B$N9bED$5$s$N%Q%C%A$rEv$F$F$$$^$9$,!"$3$A$i$O30B&$K$J$C$F$$(B
:> $B$^$7$?!#$7$+$7!"$3$l$@$1$G$O$@$a$G!"(B$B$5$i$K<!$N$h$&$JJQ99$r$7$F$O$8$a$F(B
:> JST $B$,=P$F$/$k$h$&$G$9!#(B

$B$_$J$5$s!"(BTIMEZONE$B$K(BJST$B$r;H$$$?$$$H$$(B$B$&OC$N$h$&$G$9$,!"(B

RFC1123$B$K$3$N5-;v$N:G8e$K$D$1$?5-=R$,$"$j$^$9$N$G!"$*4+$a$7$^$;$s!#(B

$B@N$N%W%m%0%i(B$B%`$G$O(BJST$B$H5-=R$5$l$?$j!"(B1992$B$r(B92$B$H5-=R$5$l$F$$$k$b$N$rM}2r(B
$B$9$kI,MW$O$"$k$N$G$9$,!"3$30$H$N%a!<%k$d$j(B$B<h$j$N$3$H$b9M$($F(B+900$B$r(B
$B;H$$$^$7$g$&!#(B

Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 15:55:06 +0900

$B$3$A$i$G;H$C$F$$$k(Bsendmail-5.65c-IDA-1.4.4$B$J$I$N(Bsrc/arpadate.c$B$K$b!"(B
JST$B$N%5%]!<%H$O$"$j$^$;$s$7!#!#!#(B($B<+J,$G%Q%C%A$7$^$7$?(B$B$,!"!"(B)

$B0J2<!"(BRFC1123$B$+$i$NH4?h$G$9!#(B
------------------------------------------------------------------------
      5.2.14  RFC-822 Date and Time Specification: RFC-822 Section 5

         The syntax for the date is hereby changed to:

            date = 1*2DIGIT month 2*4DIGIT

         All mail software SHOULD use 4-digit years in dates, to ease
         the transition to the next century.

         There is a strong trend towards the use of numeric timezone
         indicators, and implementations SHOULD use numeric timezones
         instead of timezone names.  However, all implementations MUST
         accept either notation.  If timezone names are used, they MUST
         be exactly as defined in RFC-822.

         The military time zones are specified incorrectly in RFC-822:
         they count the wrong way from UT (the signs are reversed).  As
         a result, military time zones in RFC-822 headers carry no
         information.

         Finally, note that there is a typo in the definition of "zone"
         in the syntax summary of appendix D; the correct definition
         occurs in Section 3 of RFC-822.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

--
				     $B#N#E#C(B  $B#C!u#C%7%9%F%`8&5f=j!!86:j=(?.(B
						  harasaki@TSL.CL.nec.co.jp