Article View: fj.sys.mac
Article #52398Re: [Q] Which is better for network, 6300 or 7200?
From: Taiji KANDA
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 1996 00:00
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 1996 00:00
26 lines
1773 bytes
1773 bytes
In article <arinko-2309961201580001@owani8.cc.hirosaki-u.ac.jp>, arinko@cc.hirosaki-u.ac.jp (Katsuhisa Ozaki) wrote: >7200 ใซใ10base-T ็จใฎใใฉใณใทใผใใๅฟ ่ฆใซใชใใพใใใใใถใ3000ๅใใ500 7200ใซใฏ10base-T็จใฎใใผใใๅใใใไปใใฆใใพใใใใฑใผใใซ1ๆฌใงOKใงใใ >0ๅใใใใ ใจๆใใพใใ6300 ใฏ้ไฟกในใญใใ็จใฎ Ethernet ใซใผใใไฝฟใใจๆ ใ >ใพใใใใกใใ9000ๅๅๅพใ ใฃใใจๆใใพใใ ใใตใผใใใผใใฃใผ่ฃฝใ ใจใใๅฐใๅฎใใชใใพใใใๅ ดๅใซใใฃใฆใฏไฝใใๆดใซใค ใณในใใผใซใใใชใฉใๅฟ ่ฆใซใชใฃใฆใ้ขๅ่ญใใใใงใใ >7200ใฏไฝฟใฃใใใจใใใใพใใใฎใง่งฃใใพใใใใ6300ใฏๅคๆฎตใ่ใใใจๅๅใ ใ >ใๆง่ฝใงใใๆ่ฆ็ใซใฏ7100/66ใใใฏๆฉใใใ8100/100ใซใฏใใใฐใชใใจใใฃใ ใ6300ใใฉใใใใใฎ้ๅบฆใงๅใใใฏ่งฃใใพใใใใใใใใผใฏใผใฏใ ใ ใงใใใLC630ใงใๅๅใซๅใใฆใใพใใฎใงๅ จใๅ้กใชใใจๆใใพใใ ใ97ๅนด3ๆใฎๆซใฏ็ฌฌ13ๆฌก้ๅฐปๆนๆนๅบ็บๆใงใ ใใใkan@process.saitama-u.ac.jpใใ(็ฅ็ฐใๆณฐไบ๏ผ
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<kan-2509962025270001@cerium.process.saitama-u.ac.jp>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<ochi-2009962218130001@202.26.3.82> <arinko-2309961201580001@owani8.cc.hirosaki-u.ac.jp>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: Japanese,JIS X-Google-Thread: f514d,41c565258c6e25d0 X-Google-Attributes: gidf514d,public From: kan@process.saitama-u.ac.jp (Taiji KANDA) Subject: Re: [Q] Which is better for network, 6300 or 7200? Date: 1996/09/25 Message-ID: <kan-2509962025270001@cerium.process.saitama-u.ac.jp> X-Deja-AN: 185572978 sender: news@saidai-g.cent.saitama-u.ac.jp x-nntp-posting-host: cerium.process.saitama-u.ac.jp references: <ochi-2009962218130001@202.26.3.82> <arinko-2309961201580001@owani8.cc.hirosaki-u.ac.jp> content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-2022-jp organization: Saitama Univ. Japan mime-version: 1.0 newsgroups: fj.sys.mac