🚀 go-pugleaf

Thoughts on the Fourth of July

by Dr. William Pierce
National Alliance Chairman

Two weeks ago we celebrated the Fourth of July, America's biggest
patriotic holiday. It's a time when we celebrate our strength, brag
about our accomplishments, remember our victories, and so on. It got
me to thinking about the Second World War, and I'll share some of my
thoughts on the war with you.

In that regard, the British, our allies in that war, also have been in
my thoughts recently. What made me think about the British in relation
to our Fourth of July celebration is the fact that just two weeks
earlier the British Parliament passed a law lowering the age of
consent for homosexual activity to 16. This new law, which was
approved by Parliament on June 20, was campaigned for heavily by the
so-called "chicken hawk" lobby. "Chicken hawks" are adult male
homosexuals who prey on young boys. They pick up boys on
streetcorners, ply them with drugs or drink, give them money, and
sodomize them. It used to be that they could be arrested and
prosecuted for such activity. Now they can't. Now it's legal, as long
as the boys are 16 years old. The "chicken hawks," a number of whom
actually hold seats in Parliament, already are clamoring for the legal
age to be lowered to 14. With Bill Clinton's good friend Tony Blair as
prime minister now, the "chicken hawks" probably will get what they
want.

Now how is that relevant to the Second World War? I'll tell you.
Hitler and his wicked Germans, you see, didn't approve of homosexual
activity. After Hitler became chancellor of Germany in 1933, a
homosexual who sodomized a 16-year-old boy in Germany and got caught
was in big trouble, and I mean big trouble. A lot of homosexuals wound
up in concentration camps, and not all of them came out again. Even
today they still whine about how Hitler made them wear pink triangles
on their clothes and persecuted them. But fortunately for the "chicken
hawks," Britain and America went to war against Germany, and now
homosexuals everywhere have full rights. More rights, in fact, than
the rest of us. If we hadn't fought for the rights of homosexuals in
the Second World War, then "chicken hawks" wouldn't have the right to
sodomize young boys today: certainly not in Germany, and probably not
in Britain or the United States either. Winning the war against
Germany set ideological fashions for the whole world.

Of course, it wasn't just the rights of homosexuals we fought for in
the Second World War. In fact, that part of it was kept pretty quiet
back in those days. What we were told publicly was a whole rah-rah
chorus of Fourth of July things: we fought for equality, against
book-burning, for free speech and freedom of the press, for the rights
of women and children, et cetera. Many of these excuses for going to
war against Germany were based on falsehoods -- or at least on
misrepresentations. Book burning, for example: every American has been
shown pictures of Germans throwing books on bonfires, and the story
was that Germans could read only books approved by the government.
Americans were made to believe that the books being burned were
confiscated from the homes of Germans who had been packed off to
concentration camps for having them and that it was illegal to own
such books in Germany.

Actually, the bonfires were symbolic; they were intended to express
public disapproval of certain types of books: pornography, communist
and Jewish propaganda, and the like. Before Hitler became chancellor,
the communists were very powerful in Germany, the Jews owned many
publishing houses, and pornography flourished. Hitler's government
wanted to set an example for the public; it wanted to show its
attitude toward socially harmful and trashy books. And so public
bonfires were staged, and a lot of pornography -- along with a lot of
Marx and Freud -- was burned to let the public understand that the
literary tastes of the government had changed sharply when Hitler
became chancellor. It was not illegal to own books of the sort burned
in the bonfires, but everyone understood that they were considered
degenerate or socially harmful. It wasn't until after the war that
laws were passed banning Politically Incorrect literature altogether.
For example, today, in democratic Germany, it is illegal for anyone to
attempt to publish or distribute any of the books I have written, and
so we must make German editions of these books available through the
Internet, where Germans who are brave enough to do so can download
them, print copies, and secretly distribute them to their friends.
Virtually every other book which the Jews consider offensive or
dangerous to their interests is also banned. It is even forbidden to
utter certain words or express certain ideas orally in public. There
are literally hundreds of political prisoners sitting in German
prisons today who wrote, or said, or otherwise gave expression to
prohibited ideas. That didn't happen under Hitler. It couldn't happen
until after we had beaten the Germans in the Second World War. And by
the way, don't hold your breath waiting for Mr. Clinton to express the
sort of concern for these current German political prisoners that he
expressed recently for Chinese political prisoners. It won't happen.

Or take the rights of women and children. Much of the war propaganda
produced by Roosevelt's heavily Jewish Office of War Information --
the OWI -- during the Second World War was designed to make Americans
feel morally superior to Germans and to feel justified in waging
genocidal war against them. I remember one very effective propaganda
poster produced by the OWI. It showed pretty, semi-nude girls with
German officers in a brothel. The legend on the poster was "Deliver us
from evil." The idea it was promoting was that the Germans forced
young women in the countries occupied by their army to work as sex
slaves in military brothels.

This propaganda was totally false. Although the Japanese engaged in
such behavior, the Germans never did. The Germans' behavior toward
conquered peoples, insofar as looting and rape were concerned, was
more civilized than that of any other participants in the war,
including the Americans. The people with the worst record in this
regard, of course, were our gallant Soviet allies, who were
deliberately encouraged to rape and murder civilians by their Jewish
commissar of war propaganda, Ilya Ehrenburg. I quoted some of
Ehrenburg's murderous exhortations to the Red Army in my program on
the sinking of the Wilhelm Gustloff earlier this year.

One picture from this period which is burned into my mind is a
photograph of a teen-aged German girl, about 15 years old, in a Berlin
train station shortly after the occupation of the German capital by
victorious Allied forces. The blonde girl has just been gang-raped,
the legend under the photograph tells us, and she is in a state of
shock, with tears streaming down her face. The photograph was
published in Life magazine in September 1945. I have kept a vivid
memory of it for more than 50 years. The media in this country usually
covered up such atrocities. All most Americans ever heard about from
the media were the supposed atrocities committed against the Jews by
the Germans. This photograph is, so far as I know, the only one of a
German victim which was given wide circulation, despite the hundreds
of thousands of German women raped by the forces of democracy at the
end of the war. My reaction to that photograph -- and I first saw it
at a time when I believed the propaganda story that the Germans had
killed millions of innocent Jews in gas chambers during the war -- my
reaction was that if this one girl could have been spared her ordeal
it would have been worth another six million Jews going to the gas
chambers.

But, unfortunately, that's not the way it worked out. And today, as a
direct consequence of our waging war against Germany, hundreds of
thousands of other European women have been forced into sex slavery by
White-slave racketeers headquartered in Israel. In fact, it is safe to
say that if America had not gone to war against Germany, there would
be no international trade in White slaves today. If the German view of
things had prevailed, instead of the Jewish view -- backed by
Anglo-American and Soviet military force -- there would be no Jewish
organized crime gangs operating in Europe today, no White women being
forced into prostitution by these Jewish gangs, and no state of Israel
to provide an international headquarters for the White-slave trade.
Hitler's Germany would not have tolerated White slavery in Europe, and
his example and moral backing almost certainly would have allowed the
opponents of White slavery in the United States and elsewhere to
prevail over the Jews. At the very least, the Jews could not have kept
a White-slave operation secret, because the Germans certainly would
have kept the whole world alerted. As it is now, any German who dares
to speak of the Jewish control of the White-slave trade will be
imprisoned under democratic Germany's "hate speech" laws, and we have
to depend on occasional slips of the tongue by the Jews themselves,
such as the article on White slavery which appeared in the New York
Times in January of this year, and which I already have cited in
several of my broadcasts.

You know, all of this is really peripheral to the principal
ideological justification for the Second World War, and that was
egalitarianism. One theme which the Jewish propagandists in the OWI
worked into their propaganda more than any other was the idea that the
Germans considered themselves "supermen," superior in every way to
non-Germans, and so it was our duty to disabuse them of this illusion.
Well, of course, the Germans were pretty proud of themselves, even if
they didn't really believe that they were "supermen," as the Jews
claimed they did. And they certainly weren't egalitarians. They
believed, for example, that White people, that Europeans, were
superior in intelligence and creativity and the other skills of
civilization to Black Africans. Well, virtually all White Americans
believed exactly the same thing in those days, so the OWI distorted
and misrepresented the German belief so that White Americans wouldn't
recognize it as the same as their own belief. The Germans were
portrayed as very arrogant, very intolerant, and very brutal: as
people who believed they were "supermen" and were entitled to
plunder and abuse all the rest of us.

One of the best-known examples of the way in which the Jewish
propagandists successfully misrepresented the Germans in this regard
was connected with the interaction between Adolf Hitler and the Black
athlete Jesse Owens at the 1936 Olympic Games in Berlin. Owens, of
course, won three gold medals in sprinting and jumping, and the
propagandists gleefully trumpeted that he had humiliated the German
"supermen" and had -- quote -- "smashed the myth of Aryan
superiority." -- end of quote --  They also concocted the story that
Hitler, angered by the Black's athletic victories, had "snubbed" him
and refused to shake his hand in a show of bad sportsmanship. The
Jewish media spread this story so successfully that it is still
repeated today, despite the fact that it is completely false. The
Germans, of course, were not humiliated at all in the 1936 Olympics.
In fact the Germans were the clear winners, with more gold medals than
anyone else. More silver and bronze medals than anyone else too.
Hitler's Germany won a total of 89 gold, silver, and bronze medals,
compared to 56 for Roosevelt's United States. The games were an
enormous triumph for the Germans rather than a humiliation. And Hitler
didn't "snub" Jesse Owens. In fact, Hitler stood and waved at Owens
when the Black athlete passed the reviewing stand. Owens always felt
that he had been treated royally by the Germans and couldn't
understand how the stories about a "snub" got started. Well, we
understand, don't we?

Anyway, the Germans were portrayed by Jewish propagandists as a bunch
of arrogant, heel-clicking, monocle-wearing egomaniacs who believed
that they were "supermen" and that everyone else was a "subhuman." It
was up to the democratic and egalitarian Americans to whip them and
teach them the error of their ways. That was the theme of a thousand
Hollywood propaganda films. Well, we did whip them. We bombed their
cities into ruins, we slaughtered German men, women, and children by
the millions, and then after we had beaten them we killed another
million or so of them and hanged their leaders. We taught them a real
lesson in democracy and egalitarianism.

And today we are reaping the benefits of that great victory of ours.
We are getting a real lesson in democracy and egalitarianism
ourselves. Democracy gave us Bill Clinton as our President.
Egalitarianism gave us the racial mess we have in our schools and our
cities. Democracy and egalitarianism will make us a minority in our
own country within the next few decades. That's what Bill Clinton was
gloating about when he made that amazing speech at Portland State
University last month. Whites will become a minority in America, he
said, and it will be a good thing. It would be "un-American" of us to
oppose it, he said. And you know, if Americanism is defined in terms
of the things we fought for in the Second World War, then Mr. Clinton
is absolutely right. If we really believe in egalitarianism, if we
really believe that we're just the same as Haitians and Vietnamese and
Mexican mestizos, then it won't make any difference when we become a
minority, will it? 

And more than anything else this will have been a direct consequence
of the Second World War: a direct consequence of our fighting on the
Jewish side in that war. Before the war we had a reasonably sensible
immigration policy in America. It was very hard for anyone but a
European immigrant to get in. But after we had fought a war in support
of equality, how could we justify letting Europeans in and keeping
Asians and Mexicans and Haitians out? Anyway, we let ourselves be
talked into scrapping our racially exclusionary immigration laws by
the same bunch of Jews who had lied us into the war. And so here we
are.

You know, while I'm on the subject of immigration and the Jews, I
should mention that the Jews are a little bashful about this. They
realize that America's open-border policy is increasingly unpopular
with White Americans, and they don't want to be blamed for its
consequences. And yet it is a Jewish policy, and they remain solidly
behind it, despite a few diversionary moves designed to throw us off
the track, such as occasional well publicized expressions of concern
by prominent Jews about the dangers of uncontrolled immigration. The
fact is that the big media bosses are solidly behind increasing
America's so-called "diversity" through more non-White immigration,
and the big media bosses are nearly all Jews. Mr. Clinton is solidly
behind the continued darkening of America, and if Mr. Clinton supports
a policy you can be sure it is Jewish, whether it is forcing the U.S.
military to accept homosexuals or arguing for Federal laws against
so-called "hate crimes" or keeping the borders open.

In this regard it is instructive to note that what the Jews are doing
to the United States with non-White immigration, they also are doing
to the countries which were our allies in the great war to save the
Jews. Britain, for example, is fast becoming non-British. London is a
multi-racial cesspool as bad as any city in America. And Prime
Minister Tony Blair takes his orders from the same people that Bill
Clinton does.

Australia, of course, was also one of our allies in the crusade to
destroy Germany, and White Australians, like White Americans, have
become alarmed about the efforts of the Jews and their collaborators
to destroy the European character of the Australian population. One
patriotic Australian woman, Pauline Hanson, has been especially
effective in giving expression to the concerns of White Australians.
She formed Australia's new political party, called "One Nation," and
has done startlingly well in provincial elections. The Jews and their
camp followers in Australia are frantic to stop her "keep Australia
White" movement. So just last week Jews in Australia stole the
membership list of One Nation and began publishing the names and
addresses of Pauline Hanson's supporters in the Australia/Israel
Review, hoping to intimidate them into dropping out of the party. Two
thousand names were published last week, with the threat that the
remainder of the party's supporters will have their names published in
future issues of Australia/Israel Review. The reason this threat is
intimidating is that the mass media in Australia, just as in the
United States, are utterly hostile to anyone not in accord with Jewish
policy. One good aspect of the affair, however, is that it has caused
an unexpectedly strong backlash in Australia against the Jews.

Anyway, it all hangs together: the increasingly favored status of
homosexuals, the White slave trade, and the Jewish campaign to darken
the White world everywhere: in Europe, in America, and in Australia.
And it all came directly out of our great victory in the Second World
War.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The text above is based on a broadcast of the American Dissident
Voices radio program sponsored by National Vanguard Books.
For more information about National Vanguard Books or the
National Alliance see our web site at http://www.natvan.com or
http://www.natall.com.

(c) 1998 National Vanguard Books




ICQ# 11596999

http://www.natall.com
http://www.natvan.com

I speak only for myself.

To Subscribe to American Dissident Voices weekly transcripts 
(the printed version of our weekly radio program), 
mail: ADVlist@ListServe.com which contains the word 
subscribe as the subject of your message.