🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: fl.general
Article #160

Re: Bryan Lang, NOT a Tucson child abuser

#160
From: user
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 00:00
108 lines
5591 bytes

Bryan Lang wrote:

> In article <5A98F36Z37182.7388194444@frog.gilgamesh.org>,
> fathers-rights@dragoncon.net writes:
>
> >nowhence9@aol.com (Bryan Lang) wrote:
> >>Davey, the MORON Moore posting as fathers-rights@dragoncon.net
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>It's true that Bryan Lang is a noncustodial parent who only has
> supervised
> >>>visitation.  This is because he punched his child in the face.
> >>
> >>> I've posted the case number to this group in the past....
> >>
> >>You NEVER have posted ANY case numbers, because you don't have
> >>any.  If you did you would know who the judge was, who the
> respondent
> >>is, who the petitioner is.  You would have also known the names of
> my
> >>children -- notice that one Davey!  You have always claimed I have
> only
> >>ONE child, but that is wrong!  I have more then one!
> >
> >I don't know how many children are unfortunate enough to have you as
> their
> >biological father.  I do know of the one whom you punched in the
> face.
>
> ROTFLMAO!!
>
> You have kept claiming I have only one child!   HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
>
> Hey Davey poo, since you like Google sooo much I suggest that others
> look in the Google archives at this:
>
> Subject: DAVID MOORE'S = HONORABLE DISCHARGE FROM THE MARINES!
> Newsgroups: soc.veterans
> Date: 1998/04/19
>
> Here readers will find that you preformed work for Sara Lee Corp --
> something
> which you deny, and your DOB and SSN.   You demanded that Ken post
> your DOB, SSN and discharge date, and then Stacy Alexander demanded
> it too.  Guess what?  It was done.  You served from 1988 to 1995 - a
> year
> short of a second four year enlistment.
>
> The Google archives also show that your DD-214 gives your
> re-enlistment
> code as RE-1B.  Why were you allowed out a year before the conclusion
> of your second four year enlistment if you had such a critical MOS?
>
> All of this is currently found in the Google archives......
>
> >Yes, I posted the case number here.  No, I am not going to dig it up
> again.
> >You already know it to be true.
>
> I have searched ALL of your posts in fl.general that are in the
> archives over the
> past two years. Nowhere did you post any such data.  If you wish to
> prove me
> wrong, then kindly post the DATE and subject of the post in which you
> posted
> the ALLEGED case number so EVERYONE can preform a Google search
> on their own time.  OR stand exposed as a LIAR!
>
> Just fill in the blanks Davey:
> From: ________________
> Subject:_______________
> Newsgroups: fl.general
> Date: ________________
>
> Oh, you STILL ignore the fact that under Arizona law a conviction of
> such a crime that you have alleged about me REQUIRES prison time.
> The other fact you
> ignore is that Arizona Dept. of Corrections has a website that can be
> linked
> via http://azportal.clearlake.ibm.com/webapp/portal/ -- the main
> website for the
> State of Arizona -- which displays the information about all Arizona
> inmates
> (past and present) which is public record.

I hate to get in the middle of this feud guys, but Mr. Lang you'd do well
to simply paste the actual search url, which indeed verifies your claims.
Then against there is a disclaimer, which leaves some room for doubt.
Perhaps if you simply sued this individual for libeling you (presuming he
is) this thread might expire ignominiously.

http://www.adcprisoninfo.az.gov/ISearch.htm

"ADC web site inmate data is not exhaustive. The database consulted to
provide information in this DATASEARCH covers over 112,000  inmates who
were in
the custody of ADC in 1985 and inmates arriving thereafter.

Inmates admitted and released during the period 1972 - 1985 may not be
represented on this website.  For information relating to these inmates,
please contact ADC.

 Data relating to over 30,000 inmate admissions for the 100 years up to
1972 can be found in ADC's Historical Register. "

hasta!
Technical Details
Message-ID: <3BCF6D42.63901999@news.server>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!isdnet!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!netnews.com!xfer02.netnews.com!newsfeed1.cidera.com!Cidera!portc01.blue.aol.com!nntp2.aus1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nntp3.aus1.giganews.com!bin2.nnrp.aus1.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
References: <25fceb0d.0110181445.dd07b2e@posting.google.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 101eb4,97489ac88836cfe1
X-Google-Attributes: gid101eb4,public
X-Google-Thread: 1084c1,97489ac88836cfe1
X-Google-Attributes: gid1084c1,public
X-Google-Thread: 10b3d2,97489ac88836cfe1
X-Google-Attributes: gid10b3d2,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-10-18 17:01:17 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!isdnet!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!netnews.com!xfer02.netnews.com!newsfeed1.cidera.com!Cidera!portc01.blue.aol.com!nntp2.aus1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nntp3.aus1.giganews.com!bin2.nnrp.aus1.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
Message-ID: <3BCF6D42.63901999@news.server>
From: user <news@news.server>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en]C-CCK-MCD NSCPCD476  (Win95; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: fl.general,az.general,az.jobs
Subject: Re: Bryan Lang, NOT a Tucson child abuser
References: <25fceb0d.0110181445.dd07b2e@posting.google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 110
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 19:00:59 CDT
Organization: Giganews.Com - Premium News Outsourcing
X-Trace: sv3-hRjTxXkbdBHFf3QJLnrcWVX8IbKdRZDWuSpN28zEKh/2r2OZOpu/jiZHQi1a/+EaOwZfDaSFKWGqMkc!ZYZiyrjb/iOXqKOiuW9a8HulNT7ZLFZuulsXsFFPtvtUTlIR
X-Complaints-To: abuse@GigaNews.Com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 00:00:59 GMT