🚀 go-pugleaf

> (Please forward this message to anyone who still thinks John Kerry is
> fit for command.)
> 
> A vote for John Kerry is a vote AGAINST the U.S. military personnel
> who liberated Iraq -- those Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen and Marines --
> who are now on the frontline defending our critical national interests
> in the region against Jihadi terrorists. It is also a vote against
> those who have already provided the last measure on that front in
> service to our great nation.
> 
> Indeed, there is a direct correlation between Kerry's efforts to
> politicize dissent against U.S. resolve in the war against terrorism
> -- specifically on the Iraqi warfront -- and American and Allied
> causalities on that front. Those forces, including countless Iraqis,
> are being injured and killed in ever-increasing numbers because of the
> political discord Kerry and his ilk are fomenting.
> 
> If you think there is not a connection between Kerry's campaign
> rhetoric and U.S. casualties, read on....
> 
> Kerry has reduced the war to liberate Iraq to nothing more than
> political fodder, which has emboldened our Jihadi enemies. As noted
> recently by Professor Mohammad Amin Bashar at Baghdad's Islamic
> University, "If the U.S.  Army suffered numerous humiliating losses,
> Kerry would emerge as the superman of the American people." To that
> end, Abu Jalal, an influential Iraqi resistance leader, said last
> month, "American elections and Iraq are linked tightly together. We've
> got to work to change the election, and we've done so.  With our
> strikes, we've dragged Bush into the mud."
> 
> The net effect of Kerry's dissention can certainly be felt in terms of
> increased numbers of American and Allied casualties. A few weeks ago,
> John Edwards unwittingly provided the evidence for this very
> correlation: "We lost more troops in September than we lost in August;
> lost more in August than we lost in July; lost more in July than we
> lost in June."
> 
> This was, and remains, the unavoidable consequence of Kerry's reckless
> campaign rhetoric. The blood of those American Patriots (like the
> blood of his "brothers" in Vietnam, after he used that war as fodder
> for his 1972 congressional campaign), is on John Kerry's hands.
> 
> To be sure, this is the harshest of all condemnations. But it is also
> the truth.
> 
> Now, Osama bin Laden, who planned the 9/11 attack killing 3,000 of our
> countrymen -- men, women and children -- has emerged from his rat
> hole, and issued a statement which is, unquestionably, timed to
> support John Kerry.
> 
> In that light, the most challenging question that can be asked on
> this, the eve of the 2004 Presidential Election, is not so much, "For
> whom will you vote?" but "With whom will you vote?"
> 
> Will you vote with Osama bin Laden, Abu Jalal, Saddam Hussein and Abu
> Musab Al-Zarqawi? How about Kim Jong-Il, Mohammad Khatami, Moammar
> al-Ghadafi and Hu Jingtao. All of these tyrants support John Kerry.
> 
> or...
> 
> Will you vote with America's fighting forces, who, according to a
> just- published Army Times poll, overwhelmingly support President
> George W. Bush. In fact, 82 percent of our Armed Forces said they do
> not want John Kerry as their Commander in Chief.
> 
> On Tuesday, SUPPORT OUR TROOPS -- VOTE FOR GEORGE W. BUSH!
> 
> 
> (The above comment is excerpted from The Federalist Patriot No.
> 04-42. The Patriot is the most widely subscribed e-journal on the
> Internet. Get your subscription today -- it's FREE by e-mail. Link to
> -- http://FederalistPatriot.com/subscribe/ )
> 
> "There is no good government but what is republican." --John Adams
> 
>