🚀 go-pugleaf

Bryan Lang <nowhere9@aol.com> wrote:

>In article <3a4b3d06.1983372649@news.monmouth.com>,
>  WStreett@shell.monmouth.com (Wilbur Streett) wrote:
>> Bryan Lang <nowhere9@aol.com> wrote:
>>
>> >In article <Vuu26.29666
>$RC1.1029893@newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net>,
>> >  "Kenneth Pangborn" <kenpangborn@earthlink.net> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> <freedom7-no-spam@cotse.com> wrote in message
>> >> news:977946430.3a4a473e406e8@webmail.cotse.com...
>> >> > Kenneth Pangborn is a registered sex offender.  He raped a 16
>> >> > year old girl in Wisconsin.
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> No But David Moore was convicted of having sex with a parakeet!
>> >
>> >Did you notice that Wilbur Streett did not challenge Moore to post
>> >PROOF to this wild allegation?  To bad Streett believes all the
>> >crap that Moore writes.
>>
>> Gee, twit, I don't believe everything that anyone writes.  But you
>> prove yourself a liar quite regularly, like just now.
>
>How did I prove myself to be a liar, especially at the time/date I
>wrote that reply?  Until today, you have NOT challenged Moore on
>ANYTHING he has claimed.

Not true at all.  I have also specifically stated that I don't support all
of the material on the "aboutKenPangborn" web site, other than what I
posted ot this newsgroup as a forward from Thomas.

I am very specific about what I claim to support from David Moore.  Yet you
claim that I believe EVERYTHING that he posts.  FYI, the amount of material
that he posts is rather limited.  (despite Ken Pangborn's claims to the
contrary).  Recently it's been references to his web site.. and I have not
validated EVERYTHING on the web site.  I really don't care that much
anyway.

Yes, I asked him about the sex offender claim, but I also asked who
freedom07 was, since the freedom handle is still active.  I notice a quite
difference voice behind the freedom07 handle, but there is no real proof
that both or either one is David Moore.

>Moore has repeatly claimed that Ken Pangborn is a sex offender, and
>I have never seen, until today, one single challenge from you asking
>for Moore to prove his allegation.  What is Moore's weak spot in this
>claim is that all 50 states have their registered sex offenders listed
>on their respective web sites.  Wisconsin DOES NOT have anyone by the
>name of Kenneth Pangborn listed as a registered sex offender on thier
>web site.

I've seen something of the Wisconsin argument before.. I don't recall the
particulars.  On the other hand, if a conviction was overturned, then it
wouldn't be on the "convicted sex offender" web site, (unless it's
California, where even anonymous accusations are posted).  There must be
some reason that Ken Pangborn got into the game of defending men against
false allegations of sexual abuse.  He has admitted that he went through
hell himself.  I'm aware of a few guys that are carrying plea bargain based
convictions on crimes that they obviously didn't commit.

>> But then your best defense is making false allegations, rather than
>> backing up your own claims.
>
>The archived posts from you show no challenge ever being made of Moore
>on this subject by you.  If you have evidence that counters what I have
>said, then kindly post the information, along with the date, subject
>title, and message ID.

The Deja archives are missing before the middle of '99, right?  You know
any other archives?  I have outgoing messages from '95 archived on my
machine.. But if you find what I wrote, I told BOTH OF THEM TO TAKE IT OUT
OF HERE.

>So there you have it Wilbur: Prove your point or STFU!

Prove what point?

Ken makes false statements that are easily proven false.  He does it over
and over again.  As to David Moore's statements, I call him on inconsistent
statments.. but he obviously doesn't have the problem that Ken has of
making the false accusations so empty that they can be seen through..

Now David Moore might have made some mistatements, I certainly believe that
in your case he's giving you tit for tat.  But the reality is that most of
what Ken Pangborn uses as a defense against the things that I see anyone
claim about him is always the same statement.. 

"IT'S DAVID MOORE"

Sorry, if he can't make a defense better than that.

Wilbur


     --------------------------------------------
        Putting A Human Face On Technology ;-)
     --------------------------------------------
        Literally!  http://www.TheFaceOf.com