Article View: fl.general
Article #840Re: Should the Florida legislature appoint electors?
From: lennjaeger
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 00:00
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 00:00
164 lines
11079 bytes
11079 bytes
Kenneth Pangborn wrote: > > "Charles M. Kozierok" <ixlu@PCGuide.com> wrote in message > news:gBaT5.702$yA5.98062@news.shore.net... > > > Oh, nonsense. They could get the recount done long before the 12th, > > which is 19 days away. The same court that picked the 11/26 date could > > extend it a few days if they so chose. > > Sure the court could extend it to June 2nd,2002, byt they didn't. The > point is that the count in Dade county CANNOT be done by Dec. 12th. Of > course I will defer to YOU as an EXPERT on this. You seem to know more than > the election commission. So I guess I just have to take YOURS and Mike > Daley's WORD for this. > > > } So Miami's MANUFACTURED VOTES won't come in. > > > They aren't "manufactured". They are required *by law* to determine > > voter intent, if it is reasonably clearly indicated. I have said this > > numerous times, quoted appropriate law, and it has been confirmed by > > multiple courts. Rhetoric won't change it. > > Ah yes CARNACK the magnificent. ANY indentation ANYWHERE on the ballot > means it is a GORE vote! Oh look, the ballot is discolored, that PROVES that > the voter had the intent to vote for AL GORE! Whjat will be thr RULE today? > That ALL Votes for Bush were REALLY intended to be for Gore? That the > PEOPLE just got confused and voted for the WRONG MAN? > > They are MNANUFACTURED. You forget, that Miami has already had problems > with documented voter FRAUD! Say and if it is such an HONEST proceedings, > why did they try to move the counting to a SECRET room with police keeping > out the media and the public? OPEN and FREE election? Yeah, many by Chinese > standards. As Stalin said; "it isn't the voters who count in an election, > it is the people who COUNT the votes." Amazing how in Palm Beach we find a > PILE of chads underneath the Democratic counters. Not by the Republican > ones. AGAIN you have to look at this election in some context. the FRAUDS in > Milwaukee by the Gore Campaign bussing winos from polling place to polling > place having them vote dozens of times for AL GORE, getting the students in > the Democratic Clubs at the universities to vote as many as 25 times for AL > GORE, we can look at the GOON SQUAD hired by the GORE Campaign to be in the > polling places in Little Haiti to COERCE votes for Gore. We can look at the > scheme to hi-jack the electoral college by the Gore campaign with a > systematic plan to BLACKMAIL Republican electors to switch their votes to > Gore. We can look at Palm Beach now on its SIXTH recount of the ballots. > Two machine counts Gore LOST, and three hand counts changing the rules each > time because GORE wasn't picking up enough new votes, now to this last RULE > which allows ANY INDENTAION ANYWHERE ON THE BALLOT to be counted as a GORE > VOTE! > > I'd say they ARE....... MANUFACTURING votes or damn well trying to! And > according to polls being done, so does about 68% of the American people! > > > Bush is very lucky that Miami/Dade packed it in, or he was probably > through. > > Of course. They could easilyt find 8 milliuon new votes for Gore there. > They HAVE before! Miami's election machine is infamous in Florida for FIXED > elections. But that you guys HAVE to rely on MAKING ballots AFTER the > election SCREAMS volumes about you and your candidate. He's a CROOK! > > > } Let me remind you of a small FACT. That MASSIVE fraud WAS proved in > Miami by the Democrats STUFFING the ballot box } on a previous HAND COUNT. > And Miami had to switch mayors. There is NO > provision to switch Presidents. > > > A bunch of typically hysterical accusations. I can agree that the > > process in Florida is a mess, but it is because *the law itself is a > mess*. > > Not hysterical at all. The elction process in Miami has been infamous in > Florida for decades. Never was it more rigged than during Janet Reno's days. > I don't know where you live, but in Florida we pretty well recall two > reporters who found a storeage area that had voting machines and pre punched > ballots for an up coming election. The material was turned over to the cops > and Reno to prosecute the election fraud. Instead of arresting the people > behind the attempted fraud, the evidence "disappeared" and the reporters > were arrested at Reno's instructions. And nobodsy knows this better than > the people of Florida and the people of Miami. It is interesting to hear > people from elsewhere tell us that it is "hysterical." > > > I said a week or more ago that there were two laws in conflict: the > > Supreme Court of Florida said exactly that in their ruling. The > > ridiculous wording of the law is as vague as vague can be. I think these > > county people are doing the best they can, given the very difficult > > situation they are in. I heard Judge Burton talk for a while yesterday > > and he seemed to me to be an intelligent person who did want to do what > > was fair. He's just been put in an almost impossible situation. > > No the law isn't in conflict. And that isn't what the court ruled. The > court found that in their opinion the Secretarty of State has NO DISCRETION > on elections. The court moved into uncharted waters and set aside the law > enacted by the legislature and negated the actions of the ELECTED > administrative branch of government. All of which MIGHT have been reasonable > IF................ IF............... IF.... the court had set ANY standards > for determining the voter intent. SINCE the ruling, Palm beach county has > CHANGED the standards TWICE that it has been using. Each time, finding NOT > ENOUGH new votes for Gore, so they EXPANDED their rules to allow in ballots > as votes that would not have the day before. Sir, we call that RIGGING AN > ELECTION! That may work in CHICAGO but it doesn't fly in Florida. Steps were > taken to stop the fraud in Miami since they got rid of the legal obstacle to > HONEST elections, Fidel Reno! > > > } Yeah I have developed a bias. > > > Developed? You've been frothing at the mouth since you joined this > discussion. > > And you haven't? I have seen HARD LINERS before, BUT.... your selective > input cyle is something to behold. No matter what happens you can filter out > anything that disarees with your original conclusion that gore won. > > > } I have sat and watched a PATTERN. I have > > } seen the voter fraud in Milwaukee with bussing winos from polling place > to > > > *chop* *chop* *chop* *chop* > > > Run, they're coming for you! > > Are you claiming there was NO bussing of winos in Milwaukee by a DEPUTY > in the Gore campaign? Are oyu claiming that There were NO goons in the > polling places in litte Haiti? Are you claiming that Gore agent Beckel is > NOT trying to blackmail Republican electors? So we all should disregard the > video of the Gore Deputy doing what we ALL saw? We should disregard what > Beckel said on both Fox News and MSNBC? Forget the video on ABC. Nothing is > true but what YOU and AL tell us is true? Pay NO attention to that man > behind the curtain????? Now if I believed you I'd have to be pretty stujpid. > And if you REALLY think I am going to YOU are the one with the intelligence > problem. Quit trying to seel me a bucket of horseshit, and MAYBE I'll be > less hyper about it. > > > Listen, you can write all the allegations you want, in upper case if > > that thrills you. There are plenty of allegations on all sides. They are > > not proof, they are not even evidence. Well, they re evidence of your > > inability to think rationally on this matter... > > See, my thing is that absent some showing that the video was FAKED, I > tend to accept that as PROOF of an event. Do we see a claim ANYWHERE that > the deals in Milwaukee didn't happen? That the tapes shown on ABC were > faked? Are you claiming that Bob Beckel isn't real? You see to buy YOUR > arguments we have to deny ALL that. We have to ignore that Palm Beach is > now on its SIXTH recount. Changing rules three times in the hand recounts. > Now Gore has said that if the hand recounts don't give him enough he will go > to court and make them do it AGAIN and AGAIN and AGAIN until "I WIN!" He is > willing to put this entire nation in INTENSE AGONY all for his naked > ambition. Screw what this is doing to our country. The hell with the crash > dive the stock market has been in; "I WANT TO BE PRESIDENT." > > Well I can't be certain that Gore won't win. If he does, he'll regret it > or America will. He will be the MOST HATED President in American history and > without the support of even the majority of people who voted FOR him. > Perhaps you miss the quiet whispers from Democrats in Congress urging Gore > to knock it off. The Republican majority in Congress is going to include a > bunch of honest Democrats, and they are FAR more numerous that the > Republicans or Gore realize. And unlike candidates in the past who lost an > election like this and came back to win the next election, that won't happen > now for Al. He knows, he either steals THIS election or he is though forever > anyway. In the end, honest democrats are as turned off as the rest of the > country is with Algore's hijinks. It's over! One way or the other, it's > OVER! And Gore has lost. Even if he STEALS the presidency he has lost the > American people. He might get 4 years in the White House or 20 years in > Leavenworth. Only the future will tell us which. Very original. Is this Mr. Limbaugh.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3A248BDA.7E1DEC57@bellsouth.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<8usk5s$vo4$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <hc9T5.23788$n9.1704988@newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net> <5x9T5.701$yA5.98062@news.shore.net> <0saT5.23957$n9.1715938@newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net> <gBaT5.702$yA5.98062@news.shore.net> <SBtT5.24660$xd3.2032909@newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 101eb4,cca510773f58972d X-Google-Attributes: gid101eb4,public X-Google-Thread: 1130cb,e88f68a2e04d1b50 X-Google-Attributes: gid1130cb,public X-Google-Thread: 1098dc,eeeb23d0a909b087 X-Google-Attributes: gid1098dc,public X-Google-Thread: fa03c,cca510773f58972d X-Google-Attributes: gidfa03c,public X-Google-Thread: 10a942,cca510773f58972d X-Google-Attributes: gid10a942,public X-Google-Thread: 10e835,cca510773f58972d X-Google-Attributes: gid10e835,public From: lennjaeger <nolaman@bellsouth.net> Subject: Re: Should the Florida legislature appoint electors? Date: 2000/11/28 Message-ID: <3A248BDA.7E1DEC57@bellsouth.net> X-Deja-AN: 698979799 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <8usk5s$vo4$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <hc9T5.23788$n9.1704988@newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net> <5x9T5.701$yA5.98062@news.shore.net> <0saT5.23957$n9.1715938@newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net> <gBaT5.702$yA5.98062@news.shore.net> <SBtT5.24660$xd3.2032909@newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net> X-Accept-Language: en Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: news1.mco 975473665 209.214.148.151 (Tue, 28 Nov 2000 23:54:25 EST) Organization: Naders Raiders MIME-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: NOLAMAN@bellsouth.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 23:54:25 EST Newsgroups: fl.general,alt.california,wi.general,chi.general,ne.general,miami.general