🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: fl.general
Article #963

Re: Should the Florida legislature appoint electors?

#963
From: Xiphias Gladius
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2000 04:09
34 lines
3135 bytes
In ne.general Charles M. Kozierok <ixlu@pcguide.com> wrote:

> Article I, Section 3:

> " 3. No person shall be a senator who shall not have attained to the
>  age of thirty years, and been nine years a citizen of the United
>  States, and who shall not, when elected, be an inhabitant of that
>  State for which he shall be chosen."

> The wording for the P and VP is identical: "inhabitant".

The distinction I see is the clause "when elected" which is in the
senatorial part, but not in article 2, section 1, clause 3, about electing
a president and veep, nor is it in Amendment 12.

That's a very subtle distinction, I admit.  In Judaism, we might call that
sort of distinction "pilpul" -- "hairsplitting" -- however, such
hairsplitting is important, and just because a distinction is subtle
doesn't mean that it's not significant.

The requirements for senator state that someone must be an inhabitant
*when elected.* The requirements for getting electoral votes from a state
are that either the prez or the veep candidate is not an inhabitant.  Not
"is not an inhabitant at the time of election."

Subtle?  Yes.  Significant?  I don't know; I'm not qualified to make that
judgement.  Personally, I think it is, but I'm hardly a constitutional
scholar.

	- Ian
-- 
Marriage, n: The state or condition of a community consisting of a master,
a mistress, and two slaves, making, in all, two. -- Ambrose Bierce 
SSBB Diplomatic Corps; Boston, Massachusetts
Technical Details
Message-ID: <Q7lU5.5914$IP1.240412@news1.giganews.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!europa.netcrusader.net!205.231.236.10!newspeer.monmouth.com!nntp2.aus1.giganews.com!nntp3.aus1.giganews.com!news1.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
References: <8usk5s$vo4$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <x5n1entg5d.fsf@world.std.com> <XvbU5.808$yA5.127922@news.shore.net> <x5k89qtr4r.fsf@world.std.com> <rSeU5.823$yA5.127922@news.shore.net>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 101eb4,cca510773f58972d
X-Google-Attributes: gid101eb4,public
X-Google-Thread: fa03c,cca510773f58972d
X-Google-Attributes: gidfa03c,public
X-Google-Thread: 1130cb,e88f68a2e04d1b50
X-Google-Attributes: gid1130cb,public
X-Google-Thread: 10a942,cca510773f58972d
X-Google-Attributes: gid10a942,public
X-Google-Thread: 10e835,cca510773f58972d
X-Google-Attributes: gid10e835,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2000-11-26 20:09:37 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!europa.netcrusader.net!205.231.236.10!newspeer.monmouth.com!nntp2.aus1.giganews.com!nntp3.aus1.giganews.com!news1.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Xiphias Gladius <ian@io.com>
Subject: Re: Should the Florida legislature appoint electors?
Newsgroups: fl.general,alt.california,wi.general,chi.general,ne.general
References: <8usk5s$vo4$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <x5n1entg5d.fsf@world.std.com> <XvbU5.808$yA5.127922@news.shore.net> <x5k89qtr4r.fsf@world.std.com> <rSeU5.823$yA5.127922@news.shore.net>
User-Agent: tin/pre-1.4-19990413 ("Endemoniada") (UNIX) (Linux/2.0.36 (i686))
Lines: 34
Message-ID: <Q7lU5.5914$IP1.240412@news1.giganews.com>
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2000 22:09:20 CST
Organization: Giganews.Com - Premium News Outsourcing
X-Trace: sv2-aOfF212F9zhHVSoXGwkNU3ezfa0ybeRhQN71dUeKdxpiBWfiLWWVS5DB609uyMiJb1/xnQTrZzjLmS+!Ls0uL4oGsLn3ctvodHnk6HAPg+g=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@GigaNews.Com
X-Abuse-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2000 04:09:20 GMT