Re: FLASH.NET

Article View: flashnet.support

Article #10

#10

From: Misty Blue
Date: Sat, 31 May 1997 00:00

33 lines
2425 bytes

LagMaster wrote:
> 
> spamsucks@ihateit.net wrote:
> >
> > LagMaster <tommyh@flash.net> wrote:
> >
> > >letifos@swbell.net wrote:
> > >>
> > >> FLASH.NET does what its suppose to do for $8.95 a month.
> > >>
> > >> If you want more, stop bitching and go some place else.
> >
> > >uhh i pay month to month witch is 16.18 cause with flashnet IT IS month
> > >to month
> >
> > >--
> > >LagMaster
> > >tommyh@flash.net
> >
> > go with swbell for another 3 bucks, and you wont have a problem again
> > (to speak of)
> 
> ive been swbell.. flashnet beats them badly WHEN and WHEN everything is
> working right. Swbell is 250% more relable tho.. Spending a large amount
> of my intenet time playing quake i know a good isp from a bad.
> 
> --
> LagMaster
> tommyh@flash.net

Your post doesn't make any sense. If SWB is more reliable, and you know
a good ISP from a bad one, then why are you with Flash.Net and not SWB?

Technical Details

Message-ID: <5mql0g$e9l$1@news3.texas.net>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References:

<3380a91b.1100202@news.flash.net> <3380DFB6.33D5@NOSPAM.flash.net> <338233c2.3704789@news.onramp.net> <33814385.73AB@flash.net> <26955FE0981EDC77.4223C9D7B424AFDA.CA8E51FB0DDB9212@library-proxy.airnews.net> <338784b7.26023508@news.flash.net> <338b403f.8286544@news.flash.net> <338DA593.733BBA10@flash.net> <338E3BE5.3C6D@hotmail.com> <338ED73A.6DED6364@flash.net> <338F1399.EF2@flash.net> <338F36CC.4A99AAF@flash.net> <338F6773.EF2@flash.net> <33904F06.2158@swbell.net> <3390748D.2090@flash.net> <5mq80a$lto@news1.rcsntx.swbell.net> <3390AB5B.140A@flash.net>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 113866,369fe403dbf39136
X-Google-Attributes: gid113866,public
X-Google-Thread: 10b82c,369fe403dbf39136
X-Google-Attributes: gid10b82c,public
X-Google-Thread: 100579,369fe403dbf39136
X-Google-Attributes: gid100579,public
X-Google-Thread: f9e53,6908261be80ab991
X-Google-Attributes: gidf9e53,public
X-Google-Thread: 10bd82,369fe403dbf39136
X-Google-Attributes: gid10bd82,public
X-Google-Thread: 104ad1,369fe403dbf39136
X-Google-Attributes: gid104ad1,public
From: Misty Blue <"zemia@<NO_SPAM>"@texas.net>
Subject: Re: FLASH.NET
Date: 1997/05/31
Message-ID: <5mql0g$e9l$1@news3.texas.net>
X-Deja-AN: 245322727
References: <3380a91b.1100202@news.flash.net> <3380DFB6.33D5@NOSPAM.flash.net> <338233c2.3704789@news.onramp.net> <33814385.73AB@flash.net> <26955FE0981EDC77.4223C9D7B424AFDA.CA8E51FB0DDB9212@library-proxy.airnews.net> <338784b7.26023508@news.flash.net> <338b403f.8286544@news.flash.net> <338DA593.733BBA10@flash.net> <338E3BE5.3C6D@hotmail.com> <338ED73A.6DED6364@flash.net> <338F1399.EF2@flash.net> <338F36CC.4A99AAF@flash.net> <338F6773.EF2@flash.net> <33904F06.2158@swbell.net> <3390748D.2090@flash.net> <5mq80a$lto@news1.rcsntx.swbell.net> <3390AB5B.140A@flash.net>
Organization: Texas Networking, Inc.
Reply-To: "zemia@ @texas.net" <NO_SPAM>
Newsgroups: flashnet.support,dfw.internet.providers,houston.internet.providers,austin.internet,dfw.general,austin.general,dfw.internet.providers

Reply to Parent Message