🚀 go-pugleaf

Craig Hannah wrote:
> 
> On Sat, 31 May 1997 20:59:05 -0500, Misty Blue
> <"zemia@<NO_SPAM>"@texas.net> wrote:
> 
> >LagMaster wrote:
> >>
> >> spamsucks@ihateit.net wrote:
> >> >
> >> > LagMaster <tommyh@flash.net> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > >letifos@swbell.net wrote:
> >> > >>
> >> > >> FLASH.NET does what its suppose to do for $8.95 a month.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> If you want more, stop bitching and go some place else.
> >> >
> >> > >uhh i pay month to month witch is 16.18 cause with flashnet IT IS month
> >> > >to month
> >> >
> >> > >--
> >> > >LagMaster
> >> > >tommyh@flash.net
> >> >
> >> > go with swbell for another 3 bucks, and you wont have a problem again
> >> > (to speak of)
> >>
> >> ive been swbell.. flashnet beats them badly WHEN and WHEN everything is
> >> working right. Swbell is 250% more relable tho.. Spending a large amount
> >> of my intenet time playing quake i know a good isp from a bad.
> >>
> >> --
> >> LagMaster
> >> tommyh@flash.net
> >
> >Your post doesn't make any sense. If SWB is more reliable, and you know
> >a good ISP from a bad one, then why are you with Flash.Net and not SWB?
> 
> Neither does yours, stoopid. The objejt is to torque-off the
> respondee.
> 
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Just when you think that you know it all, someone comes along and presses
> your reset button.
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Craig Hannah
> tinktime@flash.net

no no no.. go away!

-- 
LagMaster
tommyh@flash.net