🚀 go-pugleaf

THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:

PATRICK PARIS -- MAKE YOUR PANTIES PUBLIC
PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED CRACKER
PATRICK PARIS -- HATEFUL SCUMBAG
PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED REMAILER OPERATOR




In article <ON39M7SC38664.6647337963@twistycreek.com>
Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header (Howard) wrote:
>
> On Tue, 08 Nov 2005, Eelbash Admin <admin@eelbash.yi.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> BTW, twisty was concerned with altering the content of mail, not the issue
> >> of permitting floods.
> >
> >No kidding? I could have sworn he blocked me because I announced I had put
> >in filters to block floods - nothing about altering the content of mail
> >
> >Maybe twisty misunderstood what he read. Or did I phrase it confusingly?
> >
> >Well, here it is again:
> >
> >Agressive flood filters are in place. If you send too many messages
> >in too rapid succession to the same email address or newsgroup, some
> >of them may not make it. Sorry about that, but, the psychos have
> >been busy and I am sure you will understand the need to keep them
> >from disrupting newsgroups or preying on individuals
> >
> >
> >I don't see anything there that talks about altering the content of email,
> >but that's the notice that twisty reacted to.
> >
>
> I happen to be a close friend of twisty. You can tell by my other posts
> today. Here is what my friend wrote:

Cool it. You are sounding suspiciously like a sock puppet.

<<==========>>

Subject: Re: Pingers/Remops: Lunatic Eelbash at it again

On Wed, 09 Nov 2005 11:20:31 +0100, Thomas J. Boschloo wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> 
> Eelbash Admin wrote:
>> On Tue, 08 Nov 2005 20:31:40 +0000, Anonymous wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>>>Although I have the highest respect for Twisty's corporate legal
>>>>counsel, I have more respect for somebody like Zax, who said yesterday
>>>>that he has flood filters in his remailer and even added some more.
>>>
>>>Why don't you use your one remaining brain cell to read what Zax wrote
>>>again.
>>>
>>>He installed nntp filters. Those are for his usenet server.
>> 
>> 
>> I stand corrected; but isn't filtering a flood going out through an nntp
>> server the same, legally, ethically, and morally (what is the difference
>> between ethics and morals?) as filtering a flood going through an smtp
>> server?
> 
> It is not.
> 
>> If Zax thinks filtering a flood through an nntp server is ok, then I
>> still feel that I can appeal to that example as a justification for
>> filtering a flood going through my smtp server.
> 
> Steve is filtering 'floods' (BI and stuff like that). You are filtering on
> keywords.

I am filtering on floods not keywords.


> 
> And to me Steve's news server is just like any other newsserver that
> carries remailer messages. People that complain about anonymous messages
> have to complain to the last remailer in the chain.
> 
> Even Frog-Admin filtered at his news server. I think he also filtered at
> his remailer though, but I am not sure. You are a lot worse when it comes
> to filtering and distorting message content. I can't decide if you are a
> joke or a danger to the remailing community. Do you even feel you are part
> of it?
> 
> I hope Zax or Twisty will clear up the legal aspects of this filtering. In
> any case, the filtering at Zax' news server is automated and not all
> groups are monitored. Only APA-S.
> 
> I think you should see the news service and remailer service as separate
> identities.
> 
> Thomas
> - --
> Gothika: "How can you trust someone who thinks you are crazy" -----BEGIN
> PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
> 
> iQB5AwUBQ3HNbwEP2l8iXKAJAQGCQAMeLGdW16ZzdXCuz3E7+gn3GnBlvQgJPkVD
> g6ZUsEQto0M/DzthZgVL5EznltfHaA4eOIVJmcXpqHkDA070W9iY3FZajwH/LaJm
> Mt2lPRf8xSOCkgA9Z+rD2kKjlhoztDFCTIeBrQ== =ZrxQ
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

<<==========>>

Subject: sAME REMAILERS USE FOR THOSE WELCOME PONDS NOTE WASRe: ANTONIO ADMIT 
USING MIXMASTER BLAMES CAROL

Borked Pseudo Mailed wrote:
> See how loving this jehovah Witness trash talks to woman 
> Janet.We know who is behind all the messahes now.

Il mittente di questo messaggio|The sender address of this
non corrisponde ad un utente   |message is not related to a real
reale ma all'indirizzo fittizio|person but to a fake address of an
di un sistema anonimizzatore   |anonymous system
Per maggiori informazioni      |For more info
                  https://www.mixmaster.it