🚀 go-pugleaf

THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:

PATRICK PARIS -- HATEFUL SCUMBAG
PATRICK PARIS -- MAKE YOUR PANTIES PUBLIC
PATRICK PARIS -- PIECE OF SHIT
PATRICK PARIS -- MORALLY BANKRUPT




In article <1r5rk1pnef7dhulsefm6r9h900959jtcr8@4ax.com>
admin_rbtor <admin^@^rbtor^.^net> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 13 Oct 2005 00:20:06 +0200 (CEST), Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com>
> wrote:
>
> >In article <74tqk1pvnbbcb686ge7mnq7j9fuj9jf31f@4ax.com>
> >admin_rbtor <admin^@^rbtor^.^net> wrote:
> >>
> >> Ok, so I got into trouble with my ISP for operating a re-mailer. They 
consider
> >> it a server which is outside of the TOS of the agreement.
> >
> >Did you speak to a real human being, or is this all by email?
> >
> ><snip>
> >
> >> Sorry, I just have to go before I wind up in a deep pile of doo doo.
> >>
> >> Regards all,
> >>
> >> rbtor_admin
> >
> >You seem to be a resourceful guy.  Hopefully you can work something out
> >soon, for a service such as the one you've offered for a short time has
> >been valuable and regarded.
> >Thanks.
>
> Thank you so very much. I will do something. I owe the re-mailer community a
> lot.
>
> People like you, that care, are the ones that encourage me to push forward.
> See my other post.
>
> Thanks for caring. It is very much appreciated.
>
> Oh, it was by telephone. They were very nice about it. I broke the TOS, they
> just cautioned me about it in a very pleasant way. Since they were so nice, I
> am bound to reciprocate.
>
> The new service I hope to offer will be more reliable. The darn constant
> updates to Windows that requires a reboot or to the firewall security center
> requiring a reboot means I might lose mail. I am exploring options of someone
> holding incoming mail if a reboot is needed. That way I won't miss anything. I
> am striving for 100% stats. I'll do the best I can do for the users of the
> re-mailer community. When you send mail through me, it is a responsibility
> that I don't take lightly. I look at myself as a common carrier, just like the
> postal service. I don't care what the mail is, but it must get through.

1) You shouldn't ever lose mail. If your machine is down, the 
remote sending machine should retry later. If your machine goes 
down before the SMTP session officially finishes, the sending 
machine (yours or theirs) should retry later.

2) If you are still worried, investigate "secondary MX".

<<==========>>

Subject: WHY EELBASH?


E,e'l.B@$h - the only adult remailer operator

Eelbasher

<<==========>>

Subject: Re: Proof of E E L's psychosis

In article <ALSD1Y6I38640.6392592593@anonymous.poster>
Wolff Wehrkugel <wehrkugel@eelbash.yi.org> wrote:
>
> I use hashcash with the remailer as I do with Panta, so I don't see
> any disclaimer.  But what is wrong with the disclaimer? I thought
> the whole idea was to irritate people enough to use hashcash but
> not enough to stop using the remailer.
>
> You must be awfully sensitive if a little 31 line disclaimer bothers
> you that much.

Hi Eelbash.  How are you?