🚀 go-pugleaf

THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:

PATRICK PARIS -- SUCKED ONE SUCKED 'EM ALL
PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED HUMAN BEING
PATRICK PARIS -- PUNK
PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED CRACKER




In article <74tqk1pvnbbcb686ge7mnq7j9fuj9jf31f@4ax.com>
admin_rbtor <admin^@^rbtor^.^net> wrote:
>
> Ok, so I got into trouble with my ISP for operating a re-mailer. They consider
> it a server which is outside of the TOS of the agreement.
>
> They were polite, but asked I shut it down as soon a convenient. I have to
> oblige them as they are the only cable Internet provider I can choose.
>
> Darn it, just when it seemed to be operating OK.
>
> Sorry all. I'll try to figure something else out. I know a lot more now than
> when I started.
>
> Dingo had been showing my stats at 100%
>
> http://dingo.1hwy.com/Dingorlist2.html
>
> http://dingo.1hwy.com/Dingomlist2.html
>
> Sorry all. I think I had been processing nearly 10,000 messages a day or more
> if you include stats pings. Not bad for a beginning re-mailer. Hope all is
> well with all. May everyone be happy and healthy and my best wishes.
>
> Sorry, I just have to go before I wind up in a deep pile of doo doo.
>
> Regards all,
>
> rbtor_admin

You could always:

1) Go middleman. Your ISP would never know (i.e. never be able 
to trace any messages back to you).

2) Send all your outgoing mail via another annoymizing service 
(eg COTSE). Remailers have been run like this in the past.

<<==========>>

Subject: Reasons to avoid Eelbash



  In article <YJLAY9F138147.4308217593@Gilgamesh-Frog.org>,
  Eelbash Admin<Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header> wrote:
 
> It is simple: with Frog retiring, there are only 2, possibly 3, adult
> remailer operators left. I decided to do my bit for a responsible and
> adult remailer system by running Bushwa. 
> 

 
In addition to *this* arrogance, remember he also publicly campaigned for
the delisting of Austria and Dizum.  He also told us that because of his
breeding, he was superior to the rest of us. 
Yes, those actually were his reasons.

This all came after his failed attempt to institute hate-speech filters and
his "editing" of his users posts. This "superior champion of privacy" used
to read and edit users posts to make sure they met his criteria for
political correctness.

Then came his admission that he was unaware that mixmaster was a server as
well as a client, and that he had no clue what a "partitioning attack" was,
despite having run a remailer for "...over 15 years"
(a blatant,bald-faced LIE).

So his remailer was cut off from the rest of the network, become the one
and only remailer in the history of the network to receive a Remailer Death
Penalty, or RDP. Shortly thereafter, he tried to sneak back in as "Bushwa".

He was busted. Then he came back with "greatwall", despite the fact that
remailer names are supposed to observe an 8 character limit.

So now he is back again, as Asmodeus, although he is still crippled by only
being listed by 8 remailers, and 2 pingers.

His "career" as a remop is studded with examples like the ones above.
If you can find them, you can check out posts about his monitoring
and filtering behavior on past remailers he has run. 
The ones we know about are:


 eelbash
 axloltl
 axolotl2
 cheshire
 congo
 bog
 bogg
 eelbash (again)
 bushwa
 greatwall
 asmodeus
 eelbash (again!)
 eelbash (again!!)
 
Last time it took 10 days between announcing his triumphant return, 
and having to close down for ADMITTING that he was reading 
people's posts and emails AGAIN.

<<==========>>

Subject: Re: to min, seriously

On 28 Oct 2005, anon <anon@anon> wrote:
>In message <KOK7OQI538651.5396759259@anonymous.poster>,
>Anonymous <Use-Author-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote:
>>On 26 Oct 2005, anon <anon@anon> wrote:
>><s>
>     i'm not the aussie " buffoon ,"   but you answered my question .   thanx .
>     i have another question .    if you said george bush  would win the
>elections  before it happened,  can you show proof you  did this ?
>     if so,  i wonder  =how= you did it .   does a " god " tell you,  like in
>words, or mental pictures ?   i believe in the super natural,  but how any
>body can just " state " the future like it already happend ?   that seems scary
>to me .
>

Okay. Let's say for the moment that I'm convinced you're
*not* the offending, snivelling liberal lout in question;
lucky you. I'd say more, but we'll let the DEAD DOGS lie. :-D

"Scary"? That depends on your point of view--and personal
experience. When I discovered that the left-wing liberals
were socio-political and religious TOAST fast-approaching
worldwide extinction I was doing cartwheels! Anything BUT
scary from my point of view. To me it's a divine blessing.
I see & hear it by lucid dreaming, either asleep or awake;
often both. I live it, I breathe it, and I'll die with it.

As for proof, most important is that God knows what I did.
The fact that anyone can search the Google Groups archive
for time & date-stamped articles proving to my readership
precisely what I did--and did not--write is just icing on
the proverbial cake. I've written & posted many thousands
of articles and replies to popular groups since March '98;
MANY hundreds of which are specific regarding the present,
albeit my early attempts at translating my visions tended
to be unspecific...in earliest instances failing accuracy,
for which I blame only myself for having been deceived by
left-wing liberal misleaders whom I supposed in authority.
If you wonder who I'm talking about, search Google Groups.

My many critics immediately started naming me as "prophet"
even though I've never attributed such illustrious titles
to myself nor to any other but the source of all prophecy.
With a little practice my seeing became more accurate and
specific: I'm but a humble seer, an anonymous clairvoyant
seeing three screens: thus focusing the one in the middle.
The better I got at this the more accurate my translation
of visions became... but again, my earliest attempts were.
Once I got the hang of it, I adapted my vision accurately.

For an early success, I repeatedly stated that Clinton is
the last *elected* American President ever to hold office.
Bush was not elected, but was appointed amid a hopelessly-
deadlocked election. Like it or not, that's what happened.
Was it a 'Skull & Bones' ploy? Maybe, I'm not complaining.

E.g. HOURS before the 2000 election I posted the following
article entitled "GW", & dated "7 Nov 2000 03:22:57 -0000":

 http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=CQ4Q0D0F36836.9326041667@anonymous.poster

Here's the literal interlinear translation of it verbatim:

>  busc  sors,                  non inaugurare, 
  "Busc" the oracular response, not consecrated by augury,

>  in               augurium  non       *passim.
   but according to the augur who is not here and there.

*i.e., not duplicitous, neither equivocal; utterly certain.

But of course, my inept critics will say that "GW Busc" is
somehow too enigmatic, ambiguous or amphibolic, ad nauseam,
to possibly mean *GW Bush* on the very day of the election.
By "7 Nov 2000 19:21:08 -0000" that same day I posted this
article entitled "President-Elect's Natal Chart" (GW Bush):

 http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=Q7ONLKZK36837.5980092593@anonymous.poster

That's President-elect...not elected-President. Understand?
As we see, because George W. Bush was eventually appointed-
not-elected President, his inauguration was not sanctified
over the glaring hanging and dimpled chads down in Florida.
The election was broken beyond repair; remedy was in store.
Ask any liberal--ask Google's Senior Advisor *Al Gore*--if
they feel that GW Bush was legitimately elected to office?
You'll notice the deafening silence drumming from the left. :-D

Finally, as for the 2002 mid-term elections and great 2004
(re)election of President George Walker Bush, with the all-
encompassing destruction---really, self-implosion---of the
liberal Democrats who hijacked the party and took them all
down with them irrecoverably--read irredeemably--in flames,
simply search Google Groups archive for "Daniel Joseph Min":

 http://groups.google.com/groups?q=%22Daniel+Joseph+Min%22+-asshole+-fuck+-shit+-
usenet.kooks&start=0&scoring=d&hl=en&lr=&safe=on&num=100&

You'll find nearly twenty THOUSAND posts more or less that
consistently prove that I stated the 2004 election clearly
and for many months *before* the fact.  In virtually every
post, I remind readers of the liberals' unenviable destiny,
either explicitly else by inference all teaching the truth.
Just look at my posts in the months before 2 November 2004:

 http://groups.google.com/groups?q=%22daniel+joseph+min%22+-asshole+-fuck+-shit+-
bonehead+-usenet-kooks&start=0&scoring=d&hl=en&lr=&safe=active&num=100
&as_drrb=b&as_mind=10&as_minm=9&as_miny=2001&as_maxd=2&as_maxm=11&as_maxy=2004&

So you do the math. Either you acknowledge that I foretold
the elections very much as they happened, or else you deny
the facts of the matter. I don't care either way. Only God
is the Father of all, the Master of all, and Author of all.

Enjoy Life! (fillet a liberal for lunch)
Daniel Joseph Min
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x2B1CCFE7

 *Download Min's Banned (Freeware) Books:
  http://www.danieljosephmin.netfirms.com/

 *Min's Google-Archived Home Page On The WWW:
  http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=XJBDEJF138262.9022453704@anonymous.poster