🚀 go-pugleaf

THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:

PATRICK PARIS -- PIECE OF SHIT
PATRICK PARIS -- I RUB MY COCK IN YOUR FACE
PATRICK PARIS -- SCUM OF THE EARTH
PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED REMAILER OPERATOR




operators is mostly a

remop that I have
everread  I was shocked
to see that the signature
actually verifiedEelbash
you have NO place in this
community  If you think
like thatthen take up

<<==========>>

Subject: Re: Twistycreek re-mailer open to public

In article <VWLMVXIN38640.6525347222@anonymous.sender>
Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header (Twisty_admin) wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Sat, 15 Oct 2005, Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
> >In article <WDQJYD4H38640.4142939815@anonymous.poster>
> >Wolff Wehrkugel <wehrkugel@eelbash.yi.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sat, 15 Oct 2005 15:40:03 +0200, Nomen Nescio wrote:
> >>
> >> > In article <MIOP4P1V38640.0549537037@anonymous.sender>
> >> > Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header (Admin_rbtor) wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >> >> Hash: SHA1
> >> >>
> >> >> Send to remailer@twistycreek.com
> >> >> with subject:
> >> >>
> >> >> remailer-key
> >> >> remailer-config
> >> >> remailer-adminkey
> >> >> dest-block
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> > Great to see you back!
> >>
> >> Me too, but I hope your remailer will not be as up and down as Eelbash has
> >> been.
> >
> >I doubt it. He was reliable, just had ISP problems.
>
> No doubt about the ISP problems :) They were very nice about it though.
>
> I had to sign up for a 2 year commercial account. To get the fixed IP was
> additional. Now it is somewhere close to a $100 a month. I registered a new
> domain name at Network Solutions with the privacy option.
>
> The benefit is speed. At bandwidthplace.com/speedtest it comes up with
> between 6.4 and 7.0 megabits per second. Much more than I'll ever need.
>
> I have been consistantly pinged by  BLACKHOLE-1.IANA.ORG from ANONYMOUS and
> mail.brianbinder.com. A tad annoying when mine is a static commercial
> account.
>
> Odd  that they could ping me from 10.1.10.1 which is the same address as my
> new modem/router. They also tried to connect to port 137.
>
> I had to use the internal firewall to block all the connections they use.
> Now I can't access my modem/router from this PC. A never ending battle.  :)

I thought you had a static IP now, not some 10.x.x.x crap? Or is 
the static IP on the WAN side of the router? If so, no 10.x.x.x 
traffic should be coming in to your network (the router should 
be able to stop it and the ISP shouldn't be routing it to you in 
the first place).

Anyway, block ports 135-139 and 445 at the router. All virus 
stuff.

<<==========>>

Subject: Re: to min, seriously


"anon" <anon@anon> wrote in message 
news:H3DL4IKD38651.4878703704@reece.net.au...
>
>
>
>
>     i read in some groups you post to, like here, and in the sci 
> hierarchy .   my question is, why don't you ever reply to  the aussie " 
> buffoon " that stalks you so much ?
>
>
>     just curious .
>     anon


NNTP-Posting-Host: 61.9.247.77  (?)