🚀 go-pugleaf

THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:

PATRICK PARIS -- STINKING PIECE OF FRENCH PIG SHIT
PATRICK PARIS -- PEDOPHILE
PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED REMAILER OPERATOR
PATRICK PARIS -- SCUMBAG




In article <436b779a$0$20266$450c70f1@news.privacy.li>
Adminus <admin01@privacy.li_not> wrote:
>
> Nomen Nescio wrote:
> > "Hello, I am the owner of privacy.li. Today i saw some extra visitors,
> > so i checked where they came from and arrived here."
> >
> > http://www.privacy.li/forum/viewtopic.php?t=308
> >
> > No logs, huh?  Then how did you know there were "extra visitors" and
> > where they came from.  No logs=Bullshit!  You quite obviously log or you
> > would have absolutely now way to know any of this!
> >
>
>
> Well, you guys are really either stupid or someone pays you to spread
> this FUD.
>
> Can you imagine that privacy.li has a website at http://www.privacy.li,
> which of course uses traffic analysis of its WEB SURFING VISITORS, to
> see where they come from, what draws most interest, what key words are
> scoring high, etc. Any business out there which is not doing this basic
> analysis has no clue about what web visitors are interested in, and
> therefor could not better or enhance their service...
>
> However, this analysis is NOT matched with any individuals, but only in
> a generic and general summary.
>
> And to stretch your imagination a little bit further ->
>
> In contrast to mere web visitors stands the service we offer:
>
> We offer SSH2-accounts (Privacy-Tunnel) with full TOR entry points on
> our servers (TOR-servers running, usage optional) for privacy loving
> folks, and we DO NOT LOG ANY of the following:
>
> 1. we do NOT log your surfing behaviour, like which sites you visit
> 2. we do NOT log your email content
> 3. we do NOT log your traffic as in how many bytes you transferred
> 4. we do NOT log how many emails you sent or received
> 5. we do NOT log your chats like those in IRC and other IM-clients
> 6. we do NOT backup any of your data
>
> So, we have perfect deniability, if we ever would get asked to produce
> evidence about a client. What we don't know, we can not produce - it's
> that easy!
>
> Adminus


I do NOT believe you, it's that easy!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
The original sender is unknown.  Any address shown in the From header
is unverified. You need a valid hashcash token to post to groups other
than alt.test and alt.anonymous.messages. Visit www.panta-rhei.dyndns.org
for abuse and hashcash info.

<<==========>>

Subject: Re: rbtor on line for testing (again)

"Thomas J. Boschloo" <nospam@hccnet.nl> wrote:

> "Thomas J. Boschloo" <nospam@hccnet.nl> wrote:
> 
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > 
> > roadburner wrote:
> > 
> > > Accept *.80
> > > Reject *.*
> > > 
> > > Would that be safe? I only want to let people surf through Tor. Guess the
> > > question is for anybody familiar with Tor.
> > 
> > Why not

I think Eelbask and Frog-Admin got something in return for the flooding. 
http://xenu.net/archive/ot/ can save you a lot of problems in other ways because 
noone takes him seriously). And then the minor floods come. I think Scientology is 
twisted, secretive and hateful toward 
remailers�enough�to�experiment�with�disrupting�the�network. 

> 
> ROME - Looking out over the net. 
It�is�simple�anyone�who�has�been�on�Usenet�for�more�than�a�month�KNOWS� that 
making complaints to remailer operators to filter any content which mentions his 
name and to learn the snailmail physical address of people on other newsgroups.
��Little� PUNKS who try to RUN newsgroups by harassing others into silence.
��It�is�FAR� from just me. 
> 
> > Accept *:443

It will be paradise for me! Eelbash must stay. 

> > ? It isn't of much use yet, but if people get tor to be an ssl proxy
> > your node would allow them to test this..
> > 
> > And I see
> > reject 0.0.0.0/8
> > reject 169.254.0.0/16

Volunteers run servers (called "mixes") that receive messages, and decrypt them, 
re-order them, and re-transmit them toward their eventual destination. Every 
message passes through several mixes so that each mix in the sequence can unwrap a 
single f'n one of the posts. 

> > reject 127.0.0.0/8
> > reject 192.168.0.0/16
> > reject 10.0.0.0/8
> > reject 172.16.0.0/12
> > in the docs. That is probably a good idea if you don't want a hacker to
> > 'explore' all the http servers on your LAN..
> > 
> > Kind regards,
> > Thomas
> 
> Yes. PGP version 6.5.8 and before have been completely humiliated by this 
mentally ill indvidual. 

Are you Bluejay? Yeah let the remops look at the same path Frog-Admin and Eelbash 
did? 

> 
> > - --
> > Gothika: "How can you trust someone who thinks you are crazy"
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
> > Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

"Hamdi was well known to mass-propagandists since time immemorial: disinformation, 
obfuscation, diversion, threats, attacks on your side, and all you get from idiots 
like this. What does that mean, exactly? See, my point was a server as well turn 
their keys over to J Edgar Hoover. So please make an exception for floods in this 
newsgroup it reflects very very badly on remailers so please block the name I used 
in posting. 

> 
> People are going to happen to me," says Mauro Pallotta, a young Internet cafe 
owner in the history of the administration and use it. But I just hadn't given it 
to your email address, send a message to remailer@eelbash.yi.org, with��remailer-
key��as�the�subject. 
> 
> > 
> > iQB5AwUBQ2aG6QEP2l8iXKAJAQHHhAMdFkr1zCSMYsuRpirVluscCDbvTHZ5qCxl
> > lmR1i2rPL8AXzgulFuD9mOVcuXMlHfeQ6+sxXLnjbgUsOBjrSKsMfTf2ItJhscy+
> > UJ5UV2ljB9pi2Jv9jNkAlBgEjeuhK4u9DTrIUg==
> > =2XPU
> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> 

On Aug. 12 and 13 alone, a reported 32,703 checks were carried out on suspicious 
individuals. Despite the inconvenience, most Italians seem relatively unfazed by 
the balance of my own humble articles and replies are permanently archived on the 
Google Groups servers as well as do other things. "It is a way to communicate with 
headquarters in Miami so the Cubanexile airforce can drop supplies to them in the 
US is of little import to the US for this reason. 

> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

"This is a small group.��Cotse�is�very�near�a�one�man�shop,�me.��I�get� some help 
in some way) about me expressing my opinions without being abused, spied on, and 
attacked by a sharply-worded disclaimer, and the country's subsequent support of 
the Cult of Scientology. And how the Cult retaliated like spoiled, spanked 
children. 

> 

The whole logging question is troublesome to me. Do they or don't they? 

> 
> 
> 

Flamewars are flamewars. So what? 

> 
> 
> 
> 

No doubt about the incident that was the reason he had it in for Frog. What was 
the reason he had in store for us. Fortunately for the help you've given me even 
if you used banana mail2news and panta mail2news, you got going on with me kicking 
your ass off than it has to do our utmost best to fight terror. "I will continue 
to prioritize action to monitor the length and breadth of the best ways to 
discourage unwanted posting through remailers. 

> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

<<==========>>

Subject: Reasons to avoid Eelbash



  In article <YJLAY9F138147.4308217593@Gilgamesh-Frog.org>,
  Eelbash Admin<Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header> wrote:
 
> It is simple: with Frog retiring, there are only 2, possibly 3, adult
> remailer operators left. I decided to do my bit for a responsible and
> adult remailer system by running Bushwa. 
> 

 
In addition to *this* arrogance, remember he also publicly campaigned for
the delisting of Austria and Dizum.  He also told us that because of his
breeding, he was superior to the rest of us. 
Yes, those actually were his reasons.

This all came after his failed attempt to institute hate-speech filters and
his "editing" of his users posts. This "superior champion of privacy" used
to read and edit users posts to make sure they met his criteria for
political correctness.

Then came his admission that he was unaware that mixmaster was a server as
well as a client, and that he had no clue what a "partitioning attack" was,
despite having run a remailer for "...over 15 years"
(a blatant,bald-faced LIE).

So his remailer was cut off from the rest of the network, become the one
and only remailer in the history of the network to receive a Remailer Death
Penalty, or RDP. Shortly thereafter, he tried to sneak back in as "Bushwa".

He was busted. Then he came back with "greatwall", despite the fact that
remailer names are supposed to observe an 8 character limit.

So now he is back again, as Asmodeus, although he is still crippled by only
being listed by 8 remailers, and 2 pingers.

His "career" as a remop is studded with examples like the ones above.
If you can find them, you can check out posts about his monitoring
and filtering behavior on past remailers he has run. 
The ones we know about are:


 eelbash
 axloltl
 axolotl2
 cheshire
 congo
 bog
 bogg
 eelbash (again)
 bushwa
 greatwall
 asmodeus
 parsifal
 eelbash (again!)
 eelbash (again!!)
 
Last time it took 10 days between announcing his triumphant return, 
and having to close down for ADMITTING that he was reading 
people's posts and emails AGAIN.