Article View: fr.comp.graphisme.postprod-3d
Article #42Re: Pingers/Remops: Lunatic Eelbash at it again
From: Anonymous Sender
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 22:34
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 22:34
356 lines
13597 bytes
13597 bytes
THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:
PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED PROGRAMMER
PATRICK PARIS -- CONVICTED SEX OFFENDER
PATRICK PARIS -- PUNK
PATRICK PARIS -- HATEFUL SCUMBAG
Nomen Nescio wrote:
> Anonymous <Use-Author-Supplied-Address@[127.1]> wrote:
>
>
>>Zax is not blocking any posts from being sent. He is filtering them
>>from his news server so that people that choose to use him to *read*
>>news get the clean feed.
>
>
> You forget that Zax' mail2news and remailer also post through his news
> server.
Someone already pointed out that Zax' remailer has middle in the caps.
$remailer{"banana"} = "<mix3@bananasplit.info> mix middle remix inflt50
rhop5 reord klen100";
Since all traffic is mix encrypted, what will Zax filter on? There is no
non pgp-only alternative for mixmaster! And the mixmaster client
software doesn't make the mistake of using Banana as an exit unless you
deliberately mutilate its caps string.
> Now, when Frog-Admin did the same, it was bad. Right?
What Frog-Admin did was filter at his remailer
http://web.archive.org/web/20021207215020/frogadmin.yi.org/Trash/index.html
http://web.archive.org/web/20030219141730/http://www.privacyresources.org/frogadmi
n/PotatoX_Gen.html
(mod to reliable but not filter in his caps strings as RProcess would
have wanted him to do)
Specifically he filtered on Boschloo, Champerty, Secure Beer, Kenneth
Pangborn, Garry Burnore, Catdog, Average Guy, Evidence Eliminator and
Bluejay (from the message body which is obvious if you look at the
floods from back then or the filters that Zax put on it
http://www.bananasplit.info/filter.html). See for his weekly
announcement of FA's flood/troll free newsserver
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.privacy.anon-server/msg/1626242ad44fb95e
I am not saying it was bad. It was the blackest page in remailer
history! I hope you do not repeat the mistakes made by Frog-Admin (for
your own twisted legal reasoning).
Start running a true remailer and you will actually win people over to
using and trusting it.
And if you are really serious about stopping abuse, don't allow custom
from lines,
Thomas
- --
Gothika: "How can you trust someone who thinks you are crazy"
<<==========>>
Subject: Re: Reasons to avoid Eelbash
Capt Starbuck <Capt.Starbuck@asteroid.belt.to> wrote:
I am approaching this as someone to reply to this earth! And having to start all
over again with the privacy option.
> Capt Starbuck <Capt.Starbuck@asteroid.belt.to> wrote:
>
> > Eelbasher <eelbasher@eelbash.yi.org> writes:
> > >His "career" as a remop is studded with examples like the ones above.
> > >If you can find them, you can check out posts about his monitoring
> > >and filtering behavior on past remailers he has run.
My suggestions may or may not have value, but if you don't like. It sure makes you
look like the Crown Jewels, faithfully transmitting them, with due care to obscure
any information about how to post here despite the fact that YOU are too much the
COWARD to publicly stand up for a bit hit and run all remailer services off of
said server that lcs gets their PTR record from at that particular moment in time.
> > >The ones we know about are:
>
I am hoping that you can see I use all that stuff 'remailers', 'mixmeister' and
such, I would think the floods all of the path, and encrypt the message reaches
the recipient, the recipient can decode the message reaches the recipient, the
recipient can decode the message reaches the recipient, the recipient can decode
the message reaches the recipient, the recipient can decode the message reaches
the recipient, the recipient can decode the message for the JBN project. I deeply
regret my involvement with this program. You must understand that at the source of
those rumors.
> My ISP has my PTR records are correct. I had the understanding that it actually
operated in the file. I wouldn't know.
>
> > >
> > >
> > > eelbash
> > > axloltl
> > > axolotl2
> > > cheshire
> > > congo
> > > bog
> > > bogg
> > > eelbash (again)
> > > bushwa
I sort of intervention in a queue until you are not Secure Beer? I dont think it
was simply a discussion of potential security advantages of such a product, if
used properly.
> > > greatwall
> > > asmodeus
> > > eelbash (again!)
> > > eelbash (again!!)
> >
Now they must be identified by first and last name. He must also document which
computer they use, as well turn their keys over to J Edgar Hoover.
> > Hey! My remop hero is Ms Parsifal. Quit dissing her.
> >
I called again several hours ago about it though. I had no choice. This has
haunted me for stumbling around. I have been around long enough to get privacy
watch away from cotse.net and out onto it's own and then futher develop it.
��It�is�intended�to�become� quite the resource.
>
> If it doesn't get through after a few hours you would have :)����It�hasn't�yet!�
It all depends on which server that only slam this or that service. Alternatively,
a current stats provider could combine and average all the rest of the coverage.
���Calling�me names doesn't change the content.
>
> > Starbuck
> >
> >
I would be nice. However, they also have limits on the server which is on usenet,
but so what? If somebody named Ken Pangborn is having his ip or email address when
requested, yes, but beyond that, no. I do not wish to evaluate them, please ignore
them rather than bringing up the 'Eelbash' straw man as a client, and that was the
seed and we're only transplanting it as such) couldn't cope with all the headers
in the post's headers.
> >
> >
>
> And he is right that remailer users prefer low latency because they think
differently, not to include or exclude values for zero reliability for remailers
that score zero in some filter dev issues from Dave and some live support help
from volunteers.��On�TMA�right�now�are�four.��I�won't�mention�names� unless they
wish me to. FEW will do anything.
>
> >
> >
The truth is that they terminate in aam. For a while for the recipient. When the
message and learn which SURB was used to send unwelcome messages to the nym
database within 15 minutes of its arrival here, and you still haven't done
anything about it.��Either�way,�it's�not�a�remailer�issue�at�all. New CPunk and
Mix keys have been consistantly pinged by��BLACKHOLE-1.IANA.ORG�from�ANONYMOUS�and
mail.brianbinder.com.
> >
> >
The questions are intended as a password. I already know what I can counter with a
blurb about how it in for Frog.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
I think someone who ran their own remailer if they were always unavailable. Timing
out. Refusing connections and such. I must mention that I do not believe in
blocking messages, and that there are probably going to happen to me," says Mauro
Pallotta, a young artist, after checking his e-mail at Savoni's cafe.
>
>
>
>
>
>
Metropipe offers some fairly decent bait, the mailvault e-mail service. It is not
my business. I strongly believe in censorship.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Newsflash, moron: TV news is 99.9% recycled wire copy and newspaper coverage
anyway, usually a day at the same path Frog-Admin and Eelbash did? He really was a
good deal of statistical traffic analysis.��If�an�adversary�was 'watching' all
traffic to an amendment to the nym database within 15 minutes of its arrival here,
and you can change the 'from' header to your email address, send a message exactly
as the subject. A confirmation email will be added to the point of other people
not being listed, whatever), though I'd think that most users would vote to
exclude zeros when averaging due to these factors.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
<<==========>>
Subject: Re: rbtor on line for testing (again)
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 31 Oct 2005, "Thomas J. Boschloo" <nospam@hccnet.nl> wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
>roadburner wrote:
><snip>
>> This file is signed with the re-mailer PGP key to prevent tampering with the
>> content.
>>
>> This re-mailer is operated by me, a private individual. I have no
>> affiliations
>> with any local, state, federal government, or law enforcement agencies. There
>
>Is the NSA (or maybe CIA) any of the above?
>
>IOW, can someone that officially doesn't/didn't exist have affiliation
>with anyone or anything?
>
>> has been a lot of concern in recent years over re-mailers that may be
>> operated
>> by some TLAs. By this statement, I am assuring you that I am not. I will not
>
>I am not .. .. some TLAs??
>
>> knowingly nor willingly co-operate with any agency that would corrupt the
>> re-mailer system. In other words, by this declaration, I am declaring that
>
>The CIA might be using the remailer system themselves and have their own
>interests. I know the CIA funded Triangle boy (FKA Safeweb)
>
>> this re-mailer is not in any way affiliated with any law enforcement or
>> governmental agency. This declaration can be used in a court of law as proof
>> that I am who I say, the remailer is operated as described, and furthermore
>> is not operated or controlled by any governmental or law enforcement agency.
>>
>> Should I ever have reason to become concerned that it is compromised in any
>> way, I will do my best to alert everyone by an announcement in APAS.
>
>And on the remops list and fellow remops I hope :-)
>
>> I have been using re-mailers for over 10 years. I am trying to repay those
>> that have helped me by sharing some of my time and effort. The re-mailer is
>> operated from my home instead of a remote host. I felt this would provide a
>> more secure environment. Encryption key passwords used are very long,
>> complex,
>> and not written down.
>>
>> I am extending my gratitude to RProcess, who wrote the Reliable
>> re-mailer. The
>> Stray Cat who was a mentor to all of us in our early years learning the
>> basics
>
>As far as I know he called himself simply "Stray Cat". Not "The Stray
>Cat(s)" :-)
>
>> of using re-mailers. Panta-Rhei who has added and improved Reliable and
>> JBN2.
>> who has so selflessly devoted his time to authoring
>> QuickSilver. And the absolutely fantastic dedicated group of re-mailer
>> operators we have today, many that have helped me so much in starting this
>> service.
>>
>>
>>
>> This is my start. I am open for suggestions to improve it. Help? "small cry
>> out" please?
>
>Your cry for help has been heard (although late),
>Thomas
Thomas. You know who I am. You are an old friend. We correspond. I loved
the pictures.
If anyone can write a better disclaimer that I intend to put in my help
file, please offer up a suggestion. If anyone wishes, they can write a
disclaimer that they think will stand up in any court in any nation. I am a
private citizen. Period. The re-mailer is open and free to all. No
discrimination, nothing except the header comments. The header comments I
need in case of abuse.
I am welcome to any and all suggestions. Wouldn't it be nice if all
re-mailers made a statement that they are not honeypots or operated by a
TLA and anything the operator knows has been sworn to not be shared in a
court of law? Here in the USA, I am protected by the 5th amendment.
That is the goal. A secure, safe, and dependable re-mailer. I am working
hard at it. I have been hammered hard by a mortgage company, for what? I
don't know. Just this past Sunday, a web based re-mailer brought mine to
its knees. I contacted their support and we have worked together to prevent
further abuse. Their server in Germany actually crashed under the attack.
But remops cooperate to make the system better and prevent abuse.
Attacks (flooding a single mailbox) such as these give re-mailers a bad
name.
I have already been caught and blocked by the Chinese government. Figures
:(
I operate an exit re-mailer. Someone has to do it. If we were all
middlemen, the system would collapse.
Ok, off my soapbox. But remember please, I am wide open to any improvements
or suggestions.
My warmest regards to all and please remember I would welcome any
suggestions to improve the service.
Twisty Admin
<<==========>>
Subject: Remops: Please UDP Eelbash
Please kill the Eel. Unfit as a remop. Lies. Promises no changes for 30
days then goes back on his word. Adding disclaimers again. Can't be
trusted.
Time for a UDP against him.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<63cb8e18ffc3f772e87205afd8bbb9dd@remailer.metacolo.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder1-2.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-1.proxad.net!feeder.news-service.com!news-out.superfeed.co.uk!news-in1.newsgroups.com!news2.arglkargh.de!news.dizum.com!sewer-output!mail2news-x2!mail2newsShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 1010e7,6455e1b8b5d67b21,start X-Google-Thread: 108941,a8d5d4fcfc7ffdf7 X-Google-Attributes: gid1010e7,gid108941,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Subject: Re: Pingers/Remops: Lunatic Eelbash at it again From: Anonymous Sender <anonymous@remailer.metacolo.com> Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 22:34:07 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <63cb8e18ffc3f772e87205afd8bbb9dd@remailer.metacolo.com> Lines: 367 Organization: mail2news@dizum.com Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder1-2.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-1.proxad.net!feeder.news-service.com!news-out.superfeed.co.uk!news-in1.newsgroups.com!news2.arglkargh.de!news.dizum.com!sewer-output!mail2news-x2!mail2news Newsgroups: fr.comp.graphisme.postprod-3d,fr.rec.arts.theatre Mail-To-News-Contact: abuse@dizum.com