🚀 go-pugleaf

THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:

PATRICK PARIS -- THE FEMALE EUNUCH
PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED CRACKER
PATRICK PARIS -- SHITBAG
PATRICK PARIS -- SCUMBAG





Thrasher Remailer wrote:
> In <435a4e91$0$11067$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>, nospam@hccnet.nl wrote:
> 
>>remailer@twistycreek.com wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 22 Oct 2005, Anonymous <anonymous@invalid.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>In article <43597cbd$0$11078$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>
>>>>"Thomas J. Boschloo" <nospam@hccnet.nl> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Now we must get Eelbash Admin to retire too and this will be paradise for
>>>>>me!
>>>>
>>>>Eelbash must not retire! He is the single most entertaining person in
>>>>here although he doesn't intend to be.
>>>>
>>>>I read apas once a week and get great amusement out of reading
>>>>Eelbash's silly ideas for censoring (sorry I mean "stopping the
>>>>psychos"). I also enjoy reading his sock puppets where he tries to
>>>>pretend he's someone else that just happens to think and talk exactly
>>>>like him.
>>>>
>>>>He is my internet soap opera. Eelbash must stay.
>>>
>>>
>>>Wonderful entertainment that bloke.
>>
>>I don't think it is so wonderful. He is a PR danger to *all* remailers.
>>(and he knows it too)
> 
> 
> Wrong again. You're making a VERY spectacular fool of yourself all over again. 
Too stupid to even learn from the first time you did it too.

First time I said FA was a PR danger. Now I say EB is a PR danger. You
are right, I haven't learned. I still believe this..

Thomas
- --
Gothika: "How can you trust someone who thinks you are crazy"

<<==========>>

Subject: Re: remailers to give up keys?

Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header (My =?iso-8859-1?Q?2=A2?=) wrote:

> References: <4301b0d2$0$11061$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>
>  <ccdb148aace8030aaba187812baeb150@dizum.com>
>  <CEUC1SCD38581.1092361111@reece.net.au>
> 
> In article <CEUC1SCD38581.1092361111@reece.net.au>
> Thrasher Remailer <thrasher@reece.net.au> wrote:
> >
> > Nomen Nescio wrote:
> > >

This whole group got flooded and caved in to it. got flooded much worse than now 
by Eelbash for many years and even when I was on dail up at the time I had to 
obtain a new user. 

> > > On Tue, 16 Aug 2005, "Thomas J. Boschloo" 

There may be several others. Most encryption failures come from using that 
remailer? Please let us know what I really need is somehow to just try anything. 
And what, exactly, do AIM and websites have to cope with narrowminded idiots, 
privacy offenders, abusers who abuse people just because I�think�differently. 

> <nospam@hccnet.nl> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >It is very important that we do not repeat our 
> history. America is way
> > > >to bloody and aggressive right now for a stable 
> world with respect for
> > > >all religions. I also repeat my claim that they 
> have not learned from
> > > >WWII (thinking of Bush (your Avatar of War)).
> > >

That's it, and look at yourself. I already told you this, kook.
��Talk�to�the�operator�of�the�remailer�in question, who WILL be able to block your 
e-mail address from being forged, provided that you're the owner of it.
��If�that�doesn't�work,�retain�a lawyer and sue the person requesting it 
continually changes their name/alias. I have to do with remailers, kook?�� You 
admitted that your objective is to provide any kind of person who would know this 
story.��I would expect more like 50% for you and your cohorts.��May�I�ask�how�many 
is everyone? 

> > > Before you go plastering invective all over the US 
> for "bloody and
> > > aggressive" actions, you need to look at where the 
> bloodshed over radical
> > > Islam began, and who has been throwing the "first 
> stones". America (and
> > > Western civilization) has been fighting off 
> elements of radical Islam for
> > > more than 20 years.
> >
> > > The west has been on the defensive.
> > >
> > > In order to think clearly, you really have to get 
> past your media generated
> > > hatred for Bush.  It clouds your perception.
> >
> > Which media outlets are generating hatred for Bush?
> 
> CNN
> 
> 
> 

<<==========>>

Subject: Re: Panta: Why alter my headers?

Hash: SHA1

Hi !

>Panta remailer adds comma to my Newsgroups: line. Even with dizum 
>mail2news!
>
>Why does panta remailer alter headers in outgoing mail?

This is because of postings that go to a mixed bag of newsgroups, e.g.
alt.test and apas.

As panta would require hashcash for apas but not alt.test Reliable will
parse the newsgroup headers, and deliver to alt.test but not apas if
hashcash is invalid, and to both if hashcash is valid.

I thought it would be important to implement that instead of just dropping
the message, so people who include alt.test in messages will see that the
message arrived at Panta, but was not delivered to other newsgroups because
of missing/invalid hashcash.

I had a quick glance into the sources, and realized that I even dissect
your header if you have provided a valid hashcash token.
As this is not necessary I have changed it to only do that if hashcash is
invalid/missing. 

Please run a test,
Cheers,
panta-admin

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
The original sender is unknown.  Any address shown in the From header
is unverified. You need a valid hashcash token to post to groups other
than alt.test and alt.anonymous.messages. Visit www.panta-rhei.dyndns.org
for abuse and hashcash info.

Il mittente di questo messaggio|The sender address of this
non corrisponde ad un utente   |message is not related to a real
reale ma all'indirizzo fittizio|person but to a fake address of an
di un sistema anonimizzatore   |anonymous system
Per maggiori informazioni      |For more info
                  https://www.mixmaster.it