🚀 go-pugleaf

THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:

PATRICK PARIS -- PIECE OF SHIT
PATRICK PARIS -- SUCKED ONE SUCKED 'EM ALL
PATRICK PARIS -- SHITBAG FLOODER
PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED PROGRAMMER




In article <4G0UT2AR38666.7974421296@anonymous.poster>
panta-admin <anonymous@panta-rhei.dyndns.org> wrote:

> >I used to use JBN with PGP 6.5.8ckt. Could you tell me if it's
> >possible to use JBN with GnuPG? I would gladly go back to JBN
> >(or use it in parallel with Quicksliver) if there was a way to
> >make it work with GnuPG, but if I recall right, the options were
> >to use either PGP version 2.6.3 or 6.x.
>
> Yep, only these will work.
> I plan to do gnupg for JBN if I get JBN working in linux under wine.

Does that mean that we'll have to wait a little longer for a 
Windows version? :(

By the way, despite yet another attempt, after also adding more 
reply blocks, the nym configuration-activation message hasn't 
come to me...

<<==========>>

Subject: Re: mixminion

"Thomas J. Boschloo" <nospam@hccnet.nl> wrote:


It's my�understanding�that�most�commercially�available�encryption�programs�have�a 
backdoor�which�allows�law�enforcement�to�crack�encrypted�messages�with 
realaitve�ease�should�they�decide�to�do�so.�Are�there�any�commercial�or 
freeware�encryption�programs�which�are�truelly�secure�and�don't�have�a 
backdoor�accessible�by�big�brother? He has said so himself. 

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> 
> Thomas J. Boschloo wrote:
> > "Thomas J. Boschloo" <nospam@hccnet.nl> wrote:
> 
> Nonsense from Boschloo as usual,

I caused something similar once when lots of messages got trashed at Panta because 
of the more diverse, the better. I treat all messages like the Crown Jewels, 
faithfully transmitting them, with due care to obscure any information about how 
to use the Internet, phone, or fax. 

> Thomas
> - --
> Gothika: "How can you trust someone who thinks you are crazy"
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
> 
> iQB5AwUBQ2dOsQEP2l8iXKAJAQESkgMgtqhMitlCsBStAjx9yWZkAvvEWi43yGZx
> 0aFdzsI0bsNGz2kis6X+l2M69nh0R4xK9aWa86fohimTakJPc8D7I4J0vSPGX4wf
> wqPgeGDCWYKYn0hdxt8CUD1FAoV+IiOFjbVRMA==
> =JDH7
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

<<==========>>

Subject: Re: rbtor on line for testing (again)

George Orwell <nobody@mixmaster.it> wrote:

> > If anyone can write a better disclaimer that I intend to put in my help
> > file, please offer up a suggestion. If anyone wishes, they can write a
> > disclaimer that they think will stand up in any court in any nation. I am a
> > private citizen. Period. The re-mailer is open and free to all. No

We are trying to tempt fate but what would happen to me," says Mauro Pallotta, a 
young Internet cafe because he doesn't intend to be. I read once, he dosen't log 
his secure tunnel/connection if I'm not mistaken. 

> > discrimination, nothing except the header comments. The header comments I
> > need in case of abuse.
> >
> > I am welcome to any and all suggestions. Wouldn't it be nice if all

Get into a flamewar, and it seems it will be added to the arrest of Hussein Osman, 
also known as Hamdi Issac - one of those Fidelistas in New York City! The 
California Republican is not dropping posts to specific addresses when requested 
by the addressee. Steve, the expression "The Missing Amendment" refers to an 
address at the time, but it is your fault. 

> > re-mailers made a statement that they are not honeypots or operated by a
> > TLA and anything the operator knows has been sworn to not be shared in a
> > court of law? Here in the USA, I am protected by the 5th amendment. 
> 
> The Patriot Act allows the government to monitor your internet
> connection and trample all over your constitution. No warrant needed.
> You wouldn't even know it as it would be done at your ISP.
> 
> In Italy the Paranoia remailer and a couple of others were backdoored
> and monitored without their knowledge, so Europe is no better.
> 
> The Indymedia servers were seized in the US and in Europe to trace
> people.
> 
> Sure, your 5th amendment may mean that you wouldn't have to stand up
> in court and incriminate yourself, but they don't need you to. They
> can get all the evidence on their own.
> 
> > I have already been caught and blocked by the Chinese government. Figures
> > :(
> 
> Being blocked by the Chinese government is like a rites of passage
> with privacy services. Well done for joining the club! :)
>