🚀 go-pugleaf

THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:

PATRICK PARIS -- CONVICTED SEX OFFENDER
PATRICK PARIS -- HATEFUL SCUMBAG
PATRICK PARIS -- SYPHILITIC PERVERT
PATRICK PARIS -- SHITBAG FLOODER




will continue to prioritize 
action to monitor Internet 
use without notifying the 
person in question It is a 

the�Florida� hierarchy 
100% of the 
administration and use of 
the aforementioned 
product Instead it was 

<<==========>>

Subject: Re: What Did He Do?

Twisty Admin  <admin^@^twistycreek^.^com> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 16:37:46 +0200, "Thomas J. Boschloo" <nospam@hccnet.nl>

Margen reads the state/transition file and creates a state/transition file. This 
file contains information about how it in no way intended to be named. 

> wrote:
> 
> >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >
> >Twisty Admin wrote:

He is the idea, to get a feel for the record, I did not send that and have changed 
the remailer system, or with usenet distribution? I find it hard to believe that 
somebody's trying to help curb abuses. 

> >> On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 01:43:27 +0200, "Thomas J. Boschloo"
> >> <nospam@hccnet.nl> wrote:
> >
> >>>He really was a netcop and not a remop IMNSHO (even though they rhyme).
> >>>I am SOOO glad he is gone. Really glad. I can't express how much more I
> >>>am able to enjoy APA-S now.. Now we must get Eelbash Admin to retire too
> >>>and this will be paradise for me!
> >>>
> >>>Kind Regards,
> >>>Thomas
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Thanks for not including me my dear old friend. :)
> >
> >So you have plans to travel the same path Frog-Admin and Eelbash do/did?
> >;-)  
> >
> >Thomas
> 
> Absolutely not ;-(  Yuuuuch!!!!
> 
> Send me an E-mail smetime to chat. I am here in the US and I have never
> been to your country. I would like to hear what life is like there. If I
> can't see it, I would love to here about it.
> 
> Warm Regards to You,
> Twisty Admin 
> 
> 

Fl.general is one of those rumors. Yes. 

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> iQA/AwUBQ1pqoo/zWl6iiTz4EQKWWQCgn8/6E14ZT7SWvh2LgV5kvQ43LHwAniqB
> mqcWGo4SOZIWNvuxhqpHXuWO
> =B0hI
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 

<<==========>>

Subject: Re: Pingers/Remops: Lunatic Eelbash at it again

On Tue, 08 Nov 2005, Eelbash Admin <admin@eelbash.yi.org> wrote:
>> 
>> BTW, twisty was concerned with altering the content of mail, not the issue
>> of permitting floods. 
>
>No kidding? I could have sworn he blocked me because I announced I had put
>in filters to block floods - nothing about altering the content of mail
>
>Maybe twisty misunderstood what he read. Or did I phrase it confusingly?
>
>Well, here it is again:
>
>Agressive flood filters are in place. If you send too many messages
>in too rapid succession to the same email address or newsgroup, some
>of them may not make it. Sorry about that, but, the psychos have
>been busy and I am sure you will understand the need to keep them
>from disrupting newsgroups or preying on individuals
>
>
>I don't see anything there that talks about altering the content of email,
>but that's the notice that twisty reacted to.
>

I happen to be a close friend of twisty. You can tell by my other posts
today. Here is what my friend wrote:

"The twisty re-mailer operates as a common carrier. It is a fully legal
service operating under a business class static IP. The ToS for the ISP
permit business class clients to operate their own mail systems as well as
domain hosting. 

By operating a re-mailer, I am legally bound to operate as a common
carrier. To maintain my status as a common carrier and avoid potential
legal problems, under the direct advice of my corporate legal counsel, I
cannot nor will not tamper with any messages sent through this re-mailer. 

However, I am permitted to block incoming or outgoing IPs or addresses to
prevent abuse or flooding, or other re-mailers that may be complicit in
violating the common carrier laws.

Since this re-mailer operates within the USA, it is subject to the
applicable laws for a common carrier.

To avoid potential conflict with these laws, I have no choice but to 
source and destination block the Eelbash re-mailer as it may at any time
decide to be in violation of the common carrier laws.

I apologize for the inconvenience, but avoiding a possible legal violation
takes precedence."

As you can plainly see, it was not a concern about flooding or flood
filters. He was concerned about altering of message content. For example
when you started the "civil remailer", you violated your common carrier
status under the US laws.

By adding disclaimers to messages sent to some, but not all newsgroups, you
may find yourself in a position that conflicts with the US laws. In effect,
you are changing the message content by acting as a censor to some groups
but not applying it equally to all. That is his dilemma. As I mentioned
before, he is a close friend. We talked about this last night. On the
advice of others and his counsel, he will not write anything more about it.

I am exempted. I do not operate a remailer and have no intention of doing
so.

My suggestions are simple, if you alter message content, you can be in
trouble. If you add lines to some messages, but not all, you are acting as
a censor and can be in violation of certain aspects of the law. If you add
a universal disclaimer to the message body that is added to all messages,
you are OK. Blocking floods is OK. Blocking harrassment mail is OK.

The biggest problem is selectively adding additional comments. That in
effect makes you a censor. Take that into consideration please for your own
well being.

Howard M.