Re: V90: mieux que le 56kFlex?

Article View: fr.comp.peripheriques.modems

Article #22214

Back to fr.comp.peripheriques.modems Previous Next

#22214

From: Jean Schmit
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 1999 00:00

12 lines
918 bytes

Pautonnier <olivier.pautonnier@worldonline.fr> wrote:

> question: le V90: mieux que le 56kFlex?
> Olivier

Cela d�pend du serveur.
Le mieux est de lui demander.


-- 
Jean Schmit
js12@calva.net

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1dt4zgu.erkmcp18ol8owN@gre06.calvacom.fr>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <1dt3ylt.1d5rf2l4bn9ujN@francehg01-207.worldonline.fr>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: FRENCH,ASCII
X-Google-Thread: 10956e,6614f087e554dd18,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid10956e,public
From: js12@calvanet.calvacom.fr (Jean Schmit)
Subject: Re: V90: mieux que le 56kFlex?
Date: 1999/06/09
Message-ID: <1dt4zgu.erkmcp18ol8owN@gre06.calvacom.fr>
X-Deja-AN: 487514380
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
References: <1dt3ylt.1d5rf2l4bn9ujN@francehg01-207.worldonline.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Complaints-To: usenet@calvacom.fr
X-Trace: guinness.serv.psi.calva.net 928939843 10313 195.6.162.25 (9 Jun 1999 14:50:43 GMT)
Organization: None
Mime-Version: 1.0
NNTP-Posting-Date: 9 Jun 1999 14:50:43 GMT
Newsgroups: fr.comp.peripheriques.modems

Reply to Parent Message