🚀 go-pugleaf

THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:

PATRICK PARIS -- HATEFUL SCUMBAG
PATRICK PARIS -- SCUMBAG
PATRICK PARIS -- STINKING PIECE OF FRENCH PIG SHIT
PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED CRACKER




" krp" <web2457k@verizon.net> wrote:
>DAVEY MOORE  -  AGAIN
>"AD" <thrasher@reece.net.au> wrote in message 
>news:VIZIJ8T738641.2290740741@reece.net.au...
>> "Jeffrey F. Bloss" <jbloss@tampabay.mapson.rr.com> wrote:
>>>^  krp ! wrote:
>>>
>>>>     Sounds like RATIONALIZATION............... *I* have NEVER NEVER 
>>>> NEVER
>>>> NEVER NEVER NEVER used a remailer. GOT IT MORON? NEVER!
>>>> I do NOT have the anonymizing software on my computers. PERIOD!
>>>
>>>Message-ID: <TNK938ME38419.5208101852@reece.net.au>
>>>Message-ID: <tjhXd.77945$Dc.44771@trnddc06>
>>>
>>>The same message posted first through a remailer, then through your own
>>>account.
>>>
>>
>> In regard to the message IDs mentioned above, which are also mentioned on
>> the page www.aboutkenpangborn.com/altatheism.html.  To me this seems to
>> indicate that Kenny is guilty of the very offenses which he accuses others
>> of:  forging and harassing through the remailers. The message posted
>> through the remailer looks like it was a forgery of someone else in 
>> another
>> group, and the fact that Kenny a short while later sent the exact same 
>> text
>> from his known address makes it indeed seem that he was the forger.  Could
>> I be interpreting this wrong?
>>
>> If he indeed is the sender, then it would seem he is delibarately abusing
>> remailers so that he can have more ammunition in his arguments here in
>> APAS.  I am curious to know how others may interpret these facts.
>
>
>
>
>OF COURSE YOU DO DAVEY!

My name isn't Davey.  I know you're paranoid, kook, but perhaps you can get
the idea that everyone isn't "Moore".

And as usual, I note that you have no comments on the actual facts which
prove you again and again to be full of shit.

<<==========>>

Subject: Re: Privacy issue - how to spoof/hide IP when accessing email / usenet 
servers ?

Joe Fox wrote:
> 
> Excuse the top-post, but it seems to me that a really good ng to find
> solutions involving email anonymity would be alt.privacy.anon-server
> 
> <snip>

Sorry for the OT, but why do people "Excuse the top-post," then do it? <g>

Notan

<<==========>>

Subject: Reasons to avoid Eelbash



  In article <YJLAY9F138147.4308217593@Gilgamesh-Frog.org>,
  Eelbash Admin<Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header> wrote:
 
> It is simple: with Frog retiring, there are only 2, possibly 3, adult
> remailer operators left. I decided to do my bit for a responsible and
> adult remailer system by running Bushwa. 
> 

 
In addition to *this* arrogance, remember he also publicly campaigned for
the delisting of Austria and Dizum.  He also told us that because of his
breeding, he was superior to the rest of us. 
Yes, those actually were his reasons.

This all came after his failed attempt to institute hate-speech filters and
his "editing" of his users posts. This "superior champion of privacy" used
to read and edit users posts to make sure they met his criteria for
political correctness.

Then came his admission that he was unaware that mixmaster was a server as
well as a client, and that he had no clue what a "partitioning attack" was,
despite having run a remailer for "...over 15 years"
(a blatant,bald-faced LIE).

So his remailer was cut off from the rest of the network, become the one
and only remailer in the history of the network to receive a Remailer Death
Penalty, or RDP. Shortly thereafter, he tried to sneak back in as "Bushwa".

He was busted. Then he came back with "greatwall", despite the fact that
remailer names are supposed to observe an 8 character limit.

So now he is back again, as Asmodeus, although he is still crippled by only
being listed by 8 remailers, and 2 pingers.

His "career" as a remop is studded with examples like the ones above.
If you can find them, you can check out posts about his monitoring
and filtering behavior on past remailers he has run. 
The ones we know about are:


 eelbash
 axloltl
 axolotl2
 cheshire
 congo
 bog
 bogg
 eelbash (again)
 bushwa
 greatwall
 asmodeus
 eelbash (again!)
 eelbash (again!!)
 
Last time it took 10 days between announcing his triumphant return, 
and having to close down for ADMITTING that he was reading 
people's posts and emails AGAIN.