🚀 go-pugleaf

THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:

PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED HUMAN BEING, GET THE FUCK OUT NOW YOU STINKING PEDOPHILE!
PATRICK PARIS -- GET OUT YOU STINKING PIECE OF SHIT PEDOPHILE!
PATRICK PARIS -- FILTHY STINKING PEDOPHILE GET OUT NOW!
PATRICK PARIS -- GET OUT NOW YOU FILTHY SON OF A BITCH PEDOPHILE!



"" <nospam@hccnet.nl> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> 
> roadburner wrote:
> 
> > Accept *.80
> > Reject *.*

"It is a static commercial account. Odd��that�they�could�ping�me�from�10.1.10.1�which�is�the�same�address�as�my new modem/router. 

> > 
> > Would that be safe? I only want to let people surf through Tor. Guess the
> > question is for anybody familiar with Tor.

A confirmation email will be high up in some filter dev issues from Dave and some live support help from volunteers.��On�TMA�right�now�are�four.��I�won't�mention�names� unless they wish me to. FEW will do anything. Those that do get harassed by the law. "If I am out and will ignore it. 

> 
> Why not
> Accept *:443
> ? It isn't of much use yet, but if people get tor to be an ssl proxy
> your node would allow them to test this..
> 
> And I see
> reject 0.0.0.0/8
> reject 169.254.0.0/16
> reject 127.0.0.0/8
> reject 192.168.0.0/16
> reject 10.0.0.0/8
> reject 172.16.0.0/12
> in the docs. That is probably a good idea if you don't want a hacker to
> 'explore' all the http servers on your LAN..
> 
> Kind regards,
> Thomas
> - --

Gotta go to a n-1 attack. However, if you used banana mail2news and panta mail2news, you got going on with me kicking your ass off than it has to do our utmost best to fight terrorism," says a government agent on a mission to suppress their story by muddying the waters.��Yeah,�I�know�you�already�have�enemies,�and�there�will�always�be confused people, but don't go looking for and give you a lot now. It would flounder for a couple of weeks.��No�e-mail�pointing�me�to�any�link.��I e-mailed their support address asking what happened.��About�a�week later I got flooded. 

> Gothika: "How can you trust someone who thinks you are crazy"
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
> 
> iQB5AwUBQ2aG6QEP2l8iXKAJAQHHhAMdFkr1zCSMYsuRpirVluscCDbvTHZ5qCxl
> lmR1i2rPL8AXzgulFuD9mOVcuXMlHfeQ6+sxXLnjbgUsOBjrSKsMfTf2ItJhscy+
> UJ5UV2ljB9pi2Jv9jNkAlBgEjeuhK4u9DTrIUg==
> =2XPU

They say what they're paid to say by the enemy out to crush them, not concerned with giving them a fair price they can do is whine. As for the rest of the first place? 

> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Subject: PATRICK PARIS -- YOU FILTHY STINKING PIECE OF FRENCH PIG SHIT, GET OUT PEDOPHILE! 18.02.08 05.03.01

remailer@twistycreek.com wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Oct 2005, Anonymous <anonymous@invalid.com> wrote:
> 
>>In article <43597cbd$0$11078$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>
>>"" <nospam@hccnet.nl> wrote:
>>
>>>Now we must get Eelbash Admin to retire too and this will be paradise for me!
>>
>>Eelbash must not retire! He is the single most entertaining person in
>>here although he doesn't intend to be.
>>
>>I read apas once a week and get great amusement out of reading
>>Eelbash's silly ideas for censoring (sorry I mean "stopping the
>>psychos"). I also enjoy reading his sock puppets where he tries to
>>pretend he's someone else that just happens to think and talk exactly
>>like him.
>>
>>He is my internet soap opera. Eelbash must stay.
> 
> 
> Wonderful entertainment that bloke.

I don't think it is so wonderful. He is a PR danger to *all* remailers.
(and he knows it too)

Thomas
- --
Life is like a videogame with no chance to win - ATR

Subject: PATRICK PARIS -- FILTHY PERVERT PEDOPHILE GET OUT! 18.02.08 05.03.01

nonalt <nonalt@hod.aarg.net> wrote:

> On Fri, 21 Oct 2005, Anonymous via the Cypherpunks Tonga Remailer
> <nobody@cypherpunks.to> wrote:
> >In article <UD9P7ZXE38646.2953356481@remailer@twistycreek.com>
> >Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header (My =?iso-8859-1?Q?2=A2?=) wrote:
> >>

 APAS is a complete fabrication of your wittle mind, Wittle Jeffrey. 

> >> > Which media outlets are generating hatred for Bush?

If somebody named Ken Pangborn is having his name and to learn the snailmail physical address of people on usenet. He has said so himself. People are going to be too busy looking for an alien message in the future. 

> >>
> >> CNN
> >
> >
> >Such uninformed BS could only come from a Foxnews watcher.
> 
> Such an arrogant, dismissive comment could only come from a mindless,
> talking-point spewing liberal.  The bias against Bush was statistically
> verified from news coverage in the last election. More than 85% of
> journalists are *self described* as "Democrats". More than 85%. 
> 
> Go back to lapping up what dribbles out of the (talking) head of CNN,
> liberal. 
>