Article View: fr.comp.text.xml
Article #8659cheche C/C++ xml parser performant expat/oxml ou libxml ou .. ?
From: francois reygagne
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 15:05
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 15:05
14 lines
1506 bytes
1506 bytes
Je cherche pour les plateformes Linux, Solaris, Tru64, HP UX un parser xml performant. Lequel choisir ? Avez vous fait des benchmarks sur differents parsers xml ? expat/oxml est-il le plus performant ? Y a t-il une difference significative en termes de performance CPU, memoire entre expat et libxml ? Fran�ois REYGAGNE. Software Architect. opt[e]way S.A., 2881 route des Cr�tes, BP308 06906 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, FRANCE t�l: +33 (0)4 92 95 27 01 http://www.opteway.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3B8BB332.E4161BA0@opteway.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!oleane.net!oleane!nnrp.oleane.net!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: FRENCH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: 114f60,c5fc266d316cd31a,start X-Google-Attributes: gid114f60,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-08-28 08:10:04 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!oleane.net!oleane!nnrp.oleane.net!not-for-mail From: francois reygagne <freygagne@opteway.com> Newsgroups: fr.comp.text.xml Subject: cheche C/C++ xml parser performant expat/oxml ou libxml ou .. ? Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 17:05:22 +0200 Organization: opteway Lines: 17 Message-ID: <3B8BB332.E4161BA0@opteway.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: sophia1.opteway.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: s1.read.news.oleane.net 999011124 32166 195.101.210.209 (28 Aug 2001 15:05:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@oleane.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 15:05:24 +0000 (UTC) X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2 i686) X-Accept-Language: en