Passer à 48 kHz augmente-t-il la qualité ?

Article View: fr.rec.audio

Article #328

#328

From: wma imperator
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 17:20

6 lines
1427 bytes

Bonsoir tout le monde !

Je voulais savoir si, en rippant un CD audio (à 44 kHz
d'échantillonnage, naturellement) en WMA à 192 kbps à 48 kHz me fera
gagner en qualité par rapport au même CD rippé à 192 kbps à 44 kHz.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <0d6e9fa7-89cb-45c7-9b5b-5925d393ccac@r13g2000vbr.googlegroups.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!r13g2000vbr.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Thread: f587a403a4,da7d5581ff355d8d,start
X-Google-Attributes: gidf587a403a4,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: FRENCH,ASCII
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!r13g2000vbr.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: wma imperator <fulminens@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: fr.rec.audio
Subject: Passer à 48 kHz augmente-t-il la qualité ?
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 10:20:51 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 6
Message-ID: <0d6e9fa7-89cb-45c7-9b5b-5925d393ccac@r13g2000vbr.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 208.95.113.10
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1244222451 1572 127.0.0.1 (5 Jun 2009 17:20:51 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 17:20:51 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: r13g2000vbr.googlegroups.com; posting-host=208.95.113.10; 
 posting-account=4EtEEAoAAAB7b3Cy9s16iLuhftMcjcDd
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; 
 SV1),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)