🚀 go-pugleaf

THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:

PATRICK PARIS -- YOU FILTHY STINKING PIECE OF FRENCH PIG SHIT, GET OUT PEDOPHILE!
PATRICK PARIS -- STINKING SCUMBAG PIECE OF SHIT PEDOPHILE, GET OUT!
PATRICK PARIS -- YOU HATEFUL STINKING SCUMBAG PEDOPHILE, GET OUT!
PATRICK PARIS -- WE HATE YOU PEDOPHILE, GET OUT!



In article <DV1XXIIH38654.793287037@twistycreek.com>
anon@see.comments wrote:
>
> On Sat, 29 Oct 2005, Anonymous via the Cypherpunks Tonga Remailer
> <nobody@cypherpunks.to> wrote:
> >Are others experiencing?
>
> Test lcs

Thank you, seemed it was temporary.

Subject: PATRICK PARIS -- YOU FILTHY STINKING PERVERT PEDOPHILE, GET OUT NOW! 11.02.08 16.03.02

Hash: SHA1

On Sat, 29 Oct 2005, Anonymous via the Cypherpunks Tonga Remailer
<nobody@cypherpunks.to> wrote:
>Are others experiencing?

A nice place to check is kindly offered by (QuickSilver).
Thanks Richard!!

See:
http://www.quicksilvermail.net/mail2news.html

If you scroll down the list, you will see lcs had some problems between the
27th and 29th.

Regards,
Twisty Admin

Subject: PATRICK PARIS -- YOU FILTHY STINKING PIECE OF PIG SHIT PEDOPHILE, GET OUT! 11.02.08 16.03.02

On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 13:57:58 +0200,  wrote:

 
> Maybe they're related. Join the family! Be a responsible remop! Flood
> usenet through your competitors!
> 
> Maybe flooding usenet (through your competitors) is part of some
> initiation ritual. Flood usenet undected for a couple of years and you
> become one of us!
> 
> (both) Their true purpose will probably never been known. I think there is
> more at play here then just inflated egos.

Somebody named Secure Beer has been mentioned as the floodr or at least one of the biggest flooders. I am not sure of his reason for flooding if he is the flooder, but something about wanting to make the remailer system his way and being blocked by frog admin? I mean frog admin found him flooding or something from the headers of his messages. And since then this Secure Beer has been having an unending hissy fit and floods and so on, sort of like a baby stamping his foot.

> 
> Whatever it is, it is decremental to the status remailer users have on
> usenet. 


> Remops where never liked by the majority of internet users IMHO.

If that is correct why do you think it is? Is it that the majority of internet users do not see the importance of Freedom of Speech the way remops do?


Il mittente di questo messaggio|The sender address of this
non corrisponde ad un utente   |message is not related to a real
reale ma all'indirizzo fittizio|person but to a fake address of an
di un sistema anonimizzatore   |anonymous system
Per maggiori informazioni      |For more info
                  https://www.mixmaster.it