🚀 go-pugleaf

THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:

PATRICK PARIS -- HATEFUL SCUMBAG
PATRICK PARIS -- PIECE OF SHIT
PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED HUMAN BEING
PATRICK PARIS -- SHITBAG




Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header (My =?iso-8859-1?Q?2=A2?=) wrote:

> References: <4301b0d2$0$11061$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>
>  <ccdb148aace8030aaba187812baeb150@dizum.com>
>  <CEUC1SCD38581.1092361111@reece.net.au>
> 
> In article <CEUC1SCD38581.1092361111@reece.net.au>
> Thrasher Remailer <thrasher@reece.net.au> wrote:
> >
> > Nomen Nescio wrote:
> > >

This whole group got flooded and caved in to it. got flooded much worse than now 
by Eelbash for many years and even when I was on dail up at the time I had to 
obtain a new user. 

> > > On Tue, 16 Aug 2005, "Thomas J. Boschloo" 

There may be several others. Most encryption failures come from using that 
remailer? Please let us know what I really need is somehow to just try anything. 
And what, exactly, do AIM and websites have to cope with narrowminded idiots, 
privacy offenders, abusers who abuse people just because I�think�differently. 

> <nospam@hccnet.nl> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >It is very important that we do not repeat our 
> history. America is way
> > > >to bloody and aggressive right now for a stable 
> world with respect for
> > > >all religions. I also repeat my claim that they 
> have not learned from
> > > >WWII (thinking of Bush (your Avatar of War)).
> > >

That's it, and look at yourself. I already told you this, kook.
��Talk�to�the�operator�of�the�remailer�in question, who WILL be able to block your 
e-mail address from being forged, provided that you're the owner of it.
��If�that�doesn't�work,�retain�a lawyer and sue the person requesting it 
continually changes their name/alias. I have to do with remailers, kook?�� You 
admitted that your objective is to provide any kind of person who would know this 
story.��I would expect more like 50% for you and your cohorts.��May�I�ask�how�many 
is everyone? 

> > > Before you go plastering invective all over the US 
> for "bloody and
> > > aggressive" actions, you need to look at where the 
> bloodshed over radical
> > > Islam began, and who has been throwing the "first 
> stones". America (and
> > > Western civilization) has been fighting off 
> elements of radical Islam for
> > > more than 20 years.
> >
> > > The west has been on the defensive.
> > >
> > > In order to think clearly, you really have to get 
> past your media generated
> > > hatred for Bush.  It clouds your perception.
> >
> > Which media outlets are generating hatred for Bush?
> 
> CNN
> 
> 
> 

<<==========>>

Subject: Re: Since You Guys LIke Codes...


In article <RZQDGI0P38659.2927314815@anonymous.poster>
Jonathan Sturges <SturgesJonathan450@rindmail.fedreau.to> wrote:
|
| take a look at this.
|
|
| Can you read this?
|
| Olny srmat poelpe can.
|
| cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was
| rdanieg. The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid, aoccdrnig to a
| rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr
| the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoatnt tihng is taht the
| frist and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl
| mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae
| the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as
| a wlohe. Amzanig huh? yaeh and I awlyas tghuhot slpeling was
| ipmorantt!


No "code" here.  Just mis-spelled words that **sound like** the correct
word.  Communication between the eye and brain sort it out as the
research asserts.  A 7 year old relative brought this home from school
last week.  Common stuff.

This is code...

<<==========>>

Subject: Re: mixminion

This is a Type III anonymous message, sent to you by the Mixminion
server at nefarion.homelinux.net.  If you do not want to receive
anonymous messages, please contact pbox-admin@winstonsmith.info.

-----BEGIN TYPE III ANONYMOUS MESSAGE-----
Message-type: plaintext

In <185b5d9b19aca790aa9a6d9888587057@msgid.frell.theremailer.net> Fritz Wuehler 
<fritz@spamexpire-200510.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> wrote:
>nobody@winstonsmith.info wrote:
>
>> Could someone please tell me when mixminion is expected to
>>  complete its development stage.
>
>Not before Tor reaches its Golden Premium Edition.
>
>You should not expect mixminion to evolve into something offering at least 
>the functionality of mixmaster and cypherpunk before the next three or four 
>years.
>
>
>

What if the number of people using it increases? Would that encourage the 
mixminion programmers to spend more time working on it?

-----END TYPE III ANONYMOUS MESSAGE-----