Thread View: fr.rec.radio
10 messages
10 total messages
Started by switcher
Sat, 01 Apr 2006 18:53
DRM receiver
Author: switcher
Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2006 18:53
Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2006 18:53
15 lines
1319 bytes
1319 bytes
the first HiFi component for DRM radio ?? http://www.eurodatec.de/product_info.php?products_id=1274&osCsid=9569501b f77e7d2afbe8f367f3223ec0 what do the users say ?? 1599 euros... -- een appeltje te schillen met http://applefaulty.be http://users.fulladsl.be/spb13810/bwnl.htm Breng je iMac G5 terug (ik wil binnen 2 jaar geen defecte 2de hands Apple kopen) http://www.apple.com/nl/support/imac/repairextensionprogram/
Re: DRM receiver
Author: David
Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2006 19:03
Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2006 19:03
13 lines
1546 bytes
1546 bytes
On Sat, 01 Apr 2006 20:53:32 +0200, switcher <no@KijkenZeHierOokAlNaar.be> wrote: >the first HiFi component for DRM radio ?? > >http://www.eurodatec.de/product_info.php?products_id=1274&osCsid=9569501b >f77e7d2afbe8f367f3223ec0 > > >what do the users say ?? > >1599 euros... http://www.starwaves.com/produkte_eng.html
Re: DRM receiver
Author: AC Smith
Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2006 20:56
Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2006 20:56
26 lines
2075 bytes
2075 bytes
On 2006-04-01 10:53:32 -0800, switcher <no@KijkenZeHierOokAlNaar.be> said: > the first HiFi component for DRM radio ?? > > http://www.eurodatec.de/product_info.php?products_id=1274&osCsid=9569501b > f77e7d2afbe8f367f3223ec0 > > > what do the users say ?? > > 1599 euros... I'm not a user but I'll say this: "Too Expensive!" I look forward to an affordable DRM receiver, if it is truly the future of shortwave. -- acs --- Grundig Satellit 800M, Degen 1102,�FR200,� 100' Random Wire, Degen "31" Amplified Loop, Pulling signals out of thin air in the Pacific Northwest Since 1992 <http://www.chevyorange.com>
Re: DRM receiver
Author: Steve
Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2006 22:08
Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2006 22:08
1 lines
1402 bytes
1402 bytes
DRM? Are they even using that anymore?
Re: DRM receiver
Author: Steve
Date: Sun, 02 Apr 2006 03:10
Date: Sun, 02 Apr 2006 03:10
1 lines
1414 bytes
1414 bytes
It'll go the way of AM stereo. Don't even sweat it.
Re: DRM receiver
Author: Han
Date: Sun, 02 Apr 2006 08:47
Date: Sun, 02 Apr 2006 08:47
12 lines
1684 bytes
1684 bytes
Hello everyone I think seperate bands for "normal" broadcast and DRM would be the solution. Drm sounds good and I would like it to be the future, but in special SW bands! Greetings Han , the Netherlands You can also visit my website with a lot of recordings from radio stations below 30 MHz http://home.wanadoo.nl/hanhardonk/indexengels.html
Re: DRM receiver
Author: David
Date: Sun, 02 Apr 2006 12:08
Date: Sun, 02 Apr 2006 12:08
16 lines
1777 bytes
1777 bytes
On 2 Apr 2006 00:47:17 -0800, "Han" <websitehan@yahoo.com> wrote: >Hello everyone > >I think seperate bands for "normal" broadcast and DRM would be the >solution. >Drm sounds good and I would like it to be the future, but in special SW >bands! > >Greetings Han , the Netherlands > >You can also visit my website with a lot of recordings from radio >stations below 30 MHz >http://home.wanadoo.nl/hanhardonk/indexengels.html > Analog is rapidly becoming obsolete. It threatens the fascists.
Re: DRM receiver
Author: Fran�ois Guillet
Date: Sun, 02 Apr 2006 14:54
Date: Sun, 02 Apr 2006 14:54
12 lines
1691 bytes
1691 bytes
"Han" <websitehan@yahoo.com> a �crit dans le message de news: 1143967637.876362.115650@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... | Hello everyone | | I think seperate bands for "normal" broadcast and DRM would be the | solution. It's not a solution for the broadcasters. They would have to spend twice for broadcasting the same program for all listeners. They couldn't use the same transmitter/antenna to move from analog to digital if the band changed. Furthermore this would waste frequency resources.
Re: DRM receiver
Author: Arnaud
Date: Sun, 02 Apr 2006 19:54
Date: Sun, 02 Apr 2006 19:54
24 lines
1910 bytes
1910 bytes
hey. please observe the language of the group you are posting in. fr.rec.radio this is french. Thanks. On Sun, 2 Apr 2006 16:54:46 +0200, "Fran�ois Guillet" <guillet.francois@wanadoo.fr> wrote: > >"Han" <websitehan@yahoo.com> a �crit dans le message de news: >1143967637.876362.115650@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... >| Hello everyone >| >| I think seperate bands for "normal" broadcast and DRM would be the >| solution. > >It's not a solution for the broadcasters. They would have to spend twice for >broadcasting the same program for all listeners. They couldn't use the same >transmitter/antenna to move from analog to digital if the band changed. >Furthermore this would waste frequency resources. > >
Re: DRM receiver
Author: Fran�ois Guillet
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2006 20:37
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2006 20:37
11 lines
1536 bytes
1536 bytes
"Arnaud" <xcopy@club-internet.fr> a �crit dans le message de news: tua0325k76rkc3lacdk0uvs5v3ak9i3317@4ax.com... | | hey. please observe the language of the group you are posting in. | fr.rec.radio this is french. What did you write ? Sorry I don't read French :-) | Thanks.
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads