🚀 go-pugleaf

THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:

PATRICK PARIS -- SUCKED ONE SUCKED 'EM ALL
PATRICK PARIS -- SCUM OF THE EARTH
PATRICK PARIS -- SHITBAG
PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED HUMAN BEING




Ed wrote:
> Can Reliable, JBN and / 0r Quicksilver be run in Linux with wine?
> 

I dont think so. I have been myself looking for a good linux 
gui-frontend to mixmaster, but no such program exists -in the pubic 
domain at least.

i had to partition my drive so i can have some windows programs at least..

<<==========>>

Subject: Re: Why can't THRASHER admin stop objectionable posts?

Thrasher Remailer <thrasher@reece.net.au> wrote:

> >
> > On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 23:49:22 +0000, Wolfgang Wolferwitz wrote:
> >
> > > A simple VB script would prevent us from having to read the rambling of
> > > this sick mind. It is becoming a right pain in the proverbial having to
> > > sift through all the chaff just to read the occasional article written
> > > by someone with a sane mind.
> >
> > Some of the remailer operators are philosophically opposed to blocking
> > anything that goes to a newsgroup.  God knows what their reasons are, but
> > they actually believe that every sort of rubbish should be passed on.
> 
> What do you think should be passed on?
> Only things that you agree with, right?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

<<==========>>

Subject: Re: Serious question, related to this "Pangborn" stuff

AD wrote:

> "Jeffrey F. Bloss" <jbloss@tampabay.mapson.rr.com> wrote:
>>^  krp ! wrote:
>>
>>>     Sounds like RATIONALIZATION............... *I* have NEVER NEVER
>>>     NEVER
>>> NEVER NEVER NEVER used a remailer. GOT IT MORON? NEVER!
>>> I do NOT have the anonymizing software on my computers. PERIOD!
>>
>>Message-ID: <TNK938ME38419.5208101852@reece.net.au>
>>Message-ID: <tjhXd.77945$Dc.44771@trnddc06>
>>
>>The same message posted first through a remailer, then through your own
>>account.
>>
> 
> In regard to the message IDs mentioned above, which are also mentioned on
> the page www.aboutkenpangborn.com/altatheism.html.  To me this seems to
> indicate that Kenny is guilty of the very offenses which he accuses others
> of:  forging and harassing through the remailers. The message posted
> through the remailer looks like it was a forgery of someone else in
> another group, and the fact that Kenny a short while later sent the exact
> same text
> from his known address makes it indeed seem that he was the forger.  Could
> I be interpreting this wrong?
> 
> If he indeed is the sender, then it would seem he is delibarately abusing
> remailers so that he can have more ammunition in his arguments here in
> APAS.  I am curious to know how others may interpret these facts.

The term 'net-kook' comes quickly to mind