Thread View: fr.soc.alternatives
1 messages
1 total messages
Started by Anonymous
Thu, 06 Dec 2007 16:20
wE lOVE yLBASHOU eE
Author: Anonymous
Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2007 16:20
Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2007 16:20
118 lines
5092 bytes
5092 bytes
THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF: PATRICK PARIS -- I RUB MY COCK IN YOUR FACE PATRICK PARIS -- HATEFUL SCUMBAG PATRICK PARIS -- PIECE OF SHIT PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED CRACKER lpar jgnY@O.Y'bY U$R,R EelbashR -=- This message was sent via two or more anonymous remailing services. <<==========>> Subject: Re: Pingers/Remops: Lunatic Eelbash at it again On Tue, 08 Nov 2005, Eelbash Admin <admin@eelbash.yi.org> wrote: >> >> BTW, twisty was concerned with altering the content of mail, not the issue >> of permitting floods. > >No kidding? I could have sworn he blocked me because I announced I had put >in filters to block floods - nothing about altering the content of mail > >Maybe twisty misunderstood what he read. Or did I phrase it confusingly? > >Well, here it is again: > >Agressive flood filters are in place. If you send too many messages >in too rapid succession to the same email address or newsgroup, some >of them may not make it. Sorry about that, but, the psychos have >been busy and I am sure you will understand the need to keep them >from disrupting newsgroups or preying on individuals > > >I don't see anything there that talks about altering the content of email, >but that's the notice that twisty reacted to. > I happen to be a close friend of twisty. You can tell by my other posts today. Here is what my friend wrote: "The twisty re-mailer operates as a common carrier. It is a fully legal service operating under a business class static IP. The ToS for the ISP permit business class clients to operate their own mail systems as well as domain hosting. By operating a re-mailer, I am legally bound to operate as a common carrier. To maintain my status as a common carrier and avoid potential legal problems, under the direct advice of my corporate legal counsel, I cannot nor will not tamper with any messages sent through this re-mailer. However, I am permitted to block incoming or outgoing IPs or addresses to prevent abuse or flooding, or other re-mailers that may be complicit in violating the common carrier laws. Since this re-mailer operates within the USA, it is subject to the applicable laws for a common carrier. To avoid potential conflict with these laws, I have no choice but to source and destination block the Eelbash re-mailer as it may at any time decide to be in violation of the common carrier laws. I apologize for the inconvenience, but avoiding a possible legal violation takes precedence." As you can plainly see, it was not a concern about flooding or flood filters. He was concerned about altering of message content. For example when you started the "civil remailer", you violated your common carrier status under the US laws. By adding disclaimers to messages sent to some, but not all newsgroups, you may find yourself in a position that conflicts with the US laws. In effect, you are changing the message content by acting as a censor to some groups but not applying it equally to all. That is his dilemma. As I mentioned before, he is a close friend. We talked about this last night. On the advice of others and his counsel, he will not write anything more about it. I am exempted. I do not operate a remailer and have no intention of doing so. My suggestions are simple, if you alter message content, you can be in trouble. If you add lines to some messages, but not all, you are acting as a censor and can be in violation of certain aspects of the law. If you add a universal disclaimer to the message body that is added to all messages, you are OK. Blocking floods is OK. Blocking harrassment mail is OK. The biggest problem is selectively adding additional comments. That in effect makes you a censor. Take that into consideration please for your own well being. Howard M. <<==========>> Subject: Re: Ping web-mailer On 27 Oct 2005, Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header (BigappleAdmin) wrote: >I've received 3 identical emails from you. >Did you not get my first reply? > > Test Bigapple post to directive Mixmaster -=- This message was sent via two or more anonymous remailing services.
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads