Re: Is the retention here really really bad?

Article View: free.odps

Article #422

#422

From: Horace Wachope
Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2000 00:00

12 lines
906 bytes

On Tue, 01 Feb 2000 14:23:20 +1100, Sky Rider <ODPS@CyberScriber.com>
wrote:

>Horace,
>
>
>> Like *really* bad?
>
>Not exactly a major group tho is it?? :)
>

No... but you'd think posts from last week would still be here.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <38965bca.9419637@news.dingoblue.net.au>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <3896408e.2447103@news.dingoblue.net.au> <389651A8.735D8E7D@CyberScriber.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 111784,34ae8ba542cd1a28
X-Google-Attributes: gid111784,public
From: weaselstrangler@mail.com (Horace Wachope)
Subject: Re: Is the retention here really really bad?
Date: 2000/02/01
Message-ID: <38965bca.9419637@news.dingoblue.net.au>
X-Deja-AN: 580197542
References: <3896408e.2447103@news.dingoblue.net.au> <389651A8.735D8E7D@CyberScriber.com>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@optusnet.com.au
X-Trace: news1.mpx.com.au 949377929 11678 198.142.240.145 (1 Feb 2000 04:05:29 GMT)
Organization: Optus Internet
Reply-To: weaselstrangler@mail.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 1 Feb 2000 04:05:29 GMT
Newsgroups: free.odps

Reply to Parent Message