Article View: free.odps
Article #432Re: Is the retention here really really bad?
From: Horace Wachope
Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2000 00:00
Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2000 00:00
13 lines
1308 bytes
1308 bytes
On Sun, 06 Feb 2000 07:52:55 +1100, Sky Rider <ODPS@CyberScriber.com> wrote: >well.... I suppose you COULD try posting some new threads instead of just >answering?? Excuse me! I think I've started two out of the last four threads. Admittedly they were rubbish though... :) >besides.... it gets like this when school starts up again... Why's this? I thought this would the the perfect time to pick up playground slang?
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<389cb9b1.52909570@news.dingoblue.net.au>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<3896408e.2447103@news.dingoblue.net.au> <389651A8.735D8E7D@CyberScriber.com> <38965bca.9419637@news.dingoblue.net.au> <38975377.A5306B71@CyberScriber.com> <liTm4.7266$VJ1.12814@newsfeeds.bigpond.com> <389c0600.6901759@news.dingoblue.net.au> <389C8DA6.713FBBEA@CyberScriber.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 111784,34ae8ba542cd1a28 X-Google-Attributes: gid111784,public From: weaselstrangler@mail.com (Horace Wachope) Subject: Re: Is the retention here really really bad? Date: 2000/02/06 Message-ID: <389cb9b1.52909570@news.dingoblue.net.au> X-Deja-AN: 582084450 References: <3896408e.2447103@news.dingoblue.net.au> <389651A8.735D8E7D@CyberScriber.com> <38965bca.9419637@news.dingoblue.net.au> <38975377.A5306B71@CyberScriber.com> <liTm4.7266$VJ1.12814@newsfeeds.bigpond.com> <389c0600.6901759@news.dingoblue.net.au> <389C8DA6.713FBBEA@CyberScriber.com> X-Complaints-To: abuse@optusnet.com.au X-Trace: news1.mpx.com.au 949795235 16701 198.142.184.103 (6 Feb 2000 00:00:35 GMT) Organization: Optus Internet Reply-To: weaselstrangler@mail.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 6 Feb 2000 00:00:35 GMT Newsgroups: free.odps