🚀 go-pugleaf

      CompUSA has the BFG Asylum GeForce4 Ti4200 64MB DDR AGP Video Card for
$100 after $30 rebate. One cent shipping. Search for "298370" to find it.



--




"Takahito Torimoto" <ttorimotoNOSPAM@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:QNvJ9.15486$X%3.13270@news.bellsouth.net...
>
> MSI GeForce4 Ti 4200 128MB DDR with TV-Out DVI-I and DVI to VGA Adapter
>
> $140
>
> if interested, email me at: ttorimoto.at.yahoo.dot.com
>
> @yahoo.com
>
>
>
>
>
>

On Tue, 10 Dec 2002 19:58:56 -0500
"Whitey on the Moon" <123@bellsouth.net> wrote:

> 
>       CompUSA has the BFG Asylum GeForce4 Ti4200 64MB DDR AGP Video Card for
> $100 after $30 rebate. One cent shipping. Search for "298370" to find it.
> 
> 
> 
> "Takahito Torimoto" <ttorimotoNOSPAM@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:QNvJ9.15486$X%3.13270@news.bellsouth.net...
> >
> > MSI GeForce4 Ti 4200 128MB DDR with TV-Out DVI-I and DVI to VGA Adapter
> >
> > $140
> >

You cannot compare MSI to BFG, regardless of the $40 (after rebates) difference.
I would say the difference in RAM matters, but with today's games (with the exception
of 1 or 2) you barely use the RAM provided by circa 2000 video cards. Hell, I went
from a 64mb DDR Radeon to a 16mb TNT2 Vanta, but I'm wierd.


-- 
Benjamin J McMillan
gtg051h@mail.gatech.edu
--------------------------------------------------------
"Kernel Panic: I cannot find root and I want to scream!"

Benjamin J McMillan wrote:
> 
> You cannot compare MSI to BFG, regardless of the $40 (after rebates) difference.
> I would say the difference in RAM matters, but with today's games (with the exception
> of 1 or 2) you barely use the RAM provided by circa 2000 video cards. Hell, I went
> from a 64mb DDR Radeon to a 16mb TNT2 Vanta, but I'm wierd.

  You wanted video drivers that wouldn't make your system crash 
constantly?

  Chris

-- 
"Wait, what day is it?  Oh yeah, it's today.  I keep forgetting that."
"wow, it's only 11:30...it's still today!"
  -- Madhu (suffering from sleep-dep)

On Wed, 11 Dec 2002 01:37:21 GMT
noneya@noneya.noneya wrote:

> The 64m card performs less than 2% worse than the much more expensive
> 128m model.
> 

 Really? I'm not arguing, i just wanna see the benchmarks and comparisons.


-- 
Benjamin J McMillan
gtg051h@mail.gatech.edu
--------------------------------------------------------
"Kernel Panic: I cannot find root and I want to scream!"

Benjamin J McMillan wrote:
>> The 64m card performs less than 2% worse than the much more expensive
>> 128m model.
>> 
> 
>  Really? I'm not arguing, i just wanna see the benchmarks and comparisons.
> 

exactly

if the antalus level in UT2K3 doesn't use more than 64 megs of video ram I'd
be quite surprised (and highly disappointed:) )

-- 
Steven Scott [Bodoni26@resnet.gatech.edu]
Don't give up fighting, 'til nothing else stands in your way..Don't
give up talking, until there's nothing left to say....But no matter
what you do, don't ever compromise what you believe.   --The Ataris      

In git.ads Benjamin J McMillan <gtg051h@mail.gatech.edu> muttered:

>  Really? I'm not arguing, i just wanna see the benchmarks and comparisons.

Well i dont know about his statistics, but i do know you can over clock
the 4400 pretty nicely and acheive the same range of benchmarks as
the 4600.

As far as practical use, I have a few freinds who claim their upgrade from
the 4200 64mb to the 4400 128mb was quite noticeable.  I wont make that claim,
as i dont have any personal experience with it. In the end, i dont give
a rats ass abotu benchmarks, i care abou the performance of my system
withe the games i play.  

-Myke



-- 
FuZBaL                 | "The mixing of the blood and butter! They're 
Myke@Gehennom.net      |  coming together in perfect harmony!" - 
-Wholesome fuzziness   |                Mikeb, while feasting at Outback
 since 1979.           |EATSTEAKEATSTEAKEATSTEAKEATSTEAKEATSTEAKEATSTEAK