Article View: git.general
Article #123Re: AUTHOR EVENT
From: Gary James
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2000 00:00
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2000 00:00
105 lines
5410 bytes
5410 bytes
Braybrook wrote: > > "Gary James" <cnjames@homemail.com> wrote in message > news:39F338CF.EAC947DB@homemail.com... > | > | > | Braybrook wrote: > | > > | > "Gary James" <cnjames@homemail.com> wrote in message > | > news:39F3237A.8D53955@homemail.com... > | > | > | > | > | > | Lady Galadriel wrote: > | > | > > | > | > Why did Gary James say in git.general: > | > | > ) Well, it does seem that certain people are more prone to violence > than > | > | > ) others. I would say among the British it would be Irish. And among > | > | > ) Americans it appears to be Africans. > | > | > > | > | > (snicker) > | > | > > | > | > Now look at what those two groups have in common, shall we? In the > US, > | > | > African American Black People of Color have been traditionally > supressed, > | > | > condescended to, assumed to be less intelligent, victims of prejudice, > and > | > | > generally treated unfairly. More recently some people have been > working > | > | > on that, but there are still large segments of the population who > believe > | > | > the stereotypes and act accordingly. > | > | > > | > | > In the UK/Ireland...there is hate, general religious > difference/enmity, > | > | > suppression, prejudice... Gee. It seems to me that a group of people > who > | > | > are suppressed might get violent. Some of them anyway. Some of them > | > | > might try peaceful protest, but without a STRONG, visible leader, you > | > | > don't get much of anywhere. > | > | > > | > | > So fuck you, sideways, with a rusty chainsaw, with acid > | > | > dispensers. Believing and propagating a stereotype (that any > particular > | > | > group of people is worlwide likely to be "more violent" than any > | > | > other) is one of the most revolting concepts. > | > | > > | > | > -gzb > | > | > -- > | > | > "If you don't mind my expressin' my feelin's, Mr. Scott, I'll > make > | > | > free to say that you're seventeen kinds of a fool an' all of 'em > | > | > different, and then some." > | > | > -from Jack London's _White_Fang_ > | > | > | > | > | > | With all due respect, blacks committed 53.4 % of murders in US in 1998. > | > | Being they represent about 12 % of the population I think this figure > | > | cannot be ignored except by the more ignorant. And those who prefer > | > | Political Correctness to truth, which I realize appears to be a small > | > | amjority. But their ranks are dwindling. > | > | > | > | http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0004896.html > | > > | > That table does not show that 53.4% of murders were committed by blacks > in > | > 1998. It shows that 53.4% of arrests (not convictions) for murder in 1998 > were > | > of black suspects, it also does not quote a figure for the percentage of > | > murders where no one was arrested. > | > > | > | And here is how the murders were committed in 1998. > | > | > | > | http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0778269.html > | > | > | > | GJ > | > | > | I assume you have a theory that they were all released with the apologies > | of the court when it was found they were all the innocent victims of > | racial profiling, and that gun in their hand was just a coincidence ? > | > | And you further assume that the rest of the victims had to have been > | committed by the pastors of the local white Baptist churches ? > | > | Nice pat solution but it doesn't stand up to the reality of the subject. > | > | GJ > > No, I was just suggesting if you are going to provide a reference that you > should ensure it actually reflects the point you are trying to prove. The fact > is the data you provided in that link did not prove that 53.4% of murders in > 1998 were committed by blacks. I would suggest you actually review the data in > the FBI Uniform Crime Reports and restrict your comments to what is actually > shown in those reports. This was the only one I could find. I'm not usually real big on statistics. As you no doubt no, they will usually say anything if tortured enough :) But there was no deception. The page clearly says "arrests" above the list. Gary
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<39F360AD.98B55804@homemail.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<39F1BF1B.A47C0E57@bks.gatech.edu> <k2k3vscs79pkrq6g51c4jq1rsllsp03p69@4ax.com> <8st61a$7si$2@news-int.gatech.edu> <39F23044.12BB5E60@homemail.com> <8stc4a$8u4$1@news-int.gatech.edu> <39F236C8.3842DEDD@homemail.com> <8stvfb$b6t$1@news-int.gatech.edu> <39F3237A.8D53955@homemail.com> <0oGI5.582$KE5.4475@news4.atl> <39F338CF.EAC947DB@homemail.com> <zJHI5.699$KE5.5364@news4.atl>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10e1e4,d6f9bbf32b8811ea X-Google-Attributes: gid10e1e4,public X-Google-Thread: 108158,d6f9bbf32b8811ea X-Google-Attributes: gid108158,public X-Google-Thread: fa15f,d6f9bbf32b8811ea X-Google-Attributes: gidfa15f,public X-Google-Thread: f46f4,d6f9bbf32b8811ea X-Google-Attributes: gidf46f4,public From: Gary James <cnjames@homemail.com> Subject: Re: AUTHOR EVENT Date: 2000/10/22 Message-ID: <39F360AD.98B55804@homemail.com> X-Deja-AN: 684572053 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <39F1BF1B.A47C0E57@bks.gatech.edu> <k2k3vscs79pkrq6g51c4jq1rsllsp03p69@4ax.com> <8st61a$7si$2@news-int.gatech.edu> <39F23044.12BB5E60@homemail.com> <8stc4a$8u4$1@news-int.gatech.edu> <39F236C8.3842DEDD@homemail.com> <8stvfb$b6t$1@news-int.gatech.edu> <39F3237A.8D53955@homemail.com> <0oGI5.582$KE5.4475@news4.atl> <39F338CF.EAC947DB@homemail.com> <zJHI5.699$KE5.5364@news4.atl> X-Accept-Language: en Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: news4.atl 972251337 209.214.97.29 (Sun, 22 Oct 2000 17:48:57 EDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2000 17:48:57 EDT Newsgroups: git.general,git.events,atl.general,ga.general