Re: Torch delay: how bad?

Article View: git.general

Article #401

#401

From: G. M. Lupo
Date: Sun, 04 Aug 1996 00:00

18 lines
1067 bytes

Randy W. McDow wrote:

> This morning we heard that the torch was 2 hours behind schedule.
> 
> Any update?

You think you've got problems.  I'm still waiting for the torch to get to 
my area.

Matt Lupo
still waiting...

--
G. M. Lupo:  hamlet@lupo.com
P.O. Box 161963, Atlanta, GA 30321-1963
<http://www.webcom.com/~hamlet/welcome.html>
<http://www.lupo.com/~hamlet/lupo_com.html>

Technical Details

Message-ID: <32047D86.1429@lupo.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <4sog84$nkm@acmez.gatech.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10e1e4,5023711c6c5a6eec
X-Google-Attributes: gid10e1e4,public
X-Google-Thread: 108158,5023711c6c5a6eec
X-Google-Attributes: gid108158,public
X-Google-Thread: 15b564,5023711c6c5a6eec
X-Google-Attributes: gid15b564,public
From: "G. M. Lupo" <hamlet@lupo.com>
Subject: Re: Torch delay: how bad?
Date: 1996/08/04
Message-ID: <32047D86.1429@lupo.com>
X-Deja-AN: 171950967
references: <4sog84$nkm@acmez.gatech.edu>
content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
organization: Lupo Digital Services
mime-version: 1.0
newsgroups: git.general,atl.general,git.olympics
x-mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (Win16; I)

Reply to Parent Message