Re: Torch delay: how bad?

Article View: git.general

Article #404

#404

From: Stolen Child
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 1996 00:00

13 lines
974 bytes

mcdow@prism.gatech.edu (Randy W. McDow) wrote:

>This morning we heard that the torch was 2 hours behind schedule. 

>Any update? 

>Randy McDow

It made it to City Hall in downtown Atlanta about 2 hours late.  No
big deal, they had several hours of "fluff" built in.  Hey, 80+ days
and 15,000 miles later, a few hours late AIN'T bad....

Technical Details

Message-ID: <4sp6ql$4lc@dfw-ixnews9.ix.netcom.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <4sog84$nkm@acmez.gatech.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10e1e4,5023711c6c5a6eec
X-Google-Attributes: gid10e1e4,public
X-Google-Thread: 108158,5023711c6c5a6eec
X-Google-Attributes: gid108158,public
X-Google-Thread: 15b564,5023711c6c5a6eec
X-Google-Attributes: gid15b564,public
From: stlnchld@ix.netcom.com (Stolen Child)
Subject: Re: Torch delay: how bad?
Date: 1996/07/19
Message-ID: <4sp6ql$4lc@dfw-ixnews9.ix.netcom.com>
X-Deja-AN: 169699989
references: <4sog84$nkm@acmez.gatech.edu>
organization: Netcom
x-netcom-date: Fri Jul 19  6:47:33 PM CDT 1996
newsgroups: git.general,atl.general,git.olympics

Reply to Parent Message