Thread View: git.general
2 messages
2 total messages
Started by Toonces
Sat, 13 Sep 1997 00:00
Brett Tonkin not guilty
Author: Toonces
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 1997 00:00
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 1997 00:00
46 lines
3267 bytes
3267 bytes
:Ryan Thompson <gt7196b@prism.gatech.edu> wrote >On 13 Sep 1997 05:09:00 GMT, Props <props@dock.co.uk> wrote: >[...] : No, but if you do die, your parents (or whoever) had better realize :that it's YOUR FAULT and not because Ford Motor Company built a car :capable of going too fast, or some other cop-out like that... : Personal responsibility is the word of the day. The teens broke the :law and they got killed. The man broke the law (traffic violations) and :got punished for his actions, too. Albeit in a less dramatic way. I agree that personal responsibility is the key issue. The girls repeatedly vandalized his house. They did so again after midnight on a school night. In order to avoid getting caught they were speeding with lights off and running stop signs. They drove recklessly because they were afraid. Not afraid of being killed, but of being caught. All of those many actions listed above entails a risk. They had free will, they made choices. Brett Tonkin was guilty of speeding (as he admits) but he is not responsible for their deaths. Did he physically use his truck to plow the car off the road? No. The driver, Ashleigh Best, could have slowed down or turned their lights back on so he could get the license plate number. Best chose not to do so. Tonkin and his wife obviously did not seek to kill them, only to identify them and to report to the authorties or their parents. In trying to identify the kids, he also put his own life in danger. What if (and this is quite a realistic possibility), instead of Ashleigh Best crashing, Tonkin lost control of his car killing himself and his wife? No one seems to think about that. I think the reason why several public opinion polls (nightly news and - http://www.accessatlanta.com/local/news/1997/09/12/tonkin_side.html show overwhelming support for Tonkin is due to the fact that he was a respected, law-abiding member of his community. And most of those polled can easily imagine being him and doing the exact same thing in his position. For any of you who think that Tonkin has "won" his case, you are wrong. Besides the fact that he is personally devastated by this tragedy, he faces at least 1 civil suit forthcoming. It's very possible he will lose that, on top of huge legal bills. -- "A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it." - Max Planck George Nichols gn24@prism.gatech.edu http://www.pobox.com/~shrine
Re: Brett Tonkin not guilty
Author: Just a soldier in life.
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 1997 00:00
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 1997 00:00
13 lines
1281 bytes
1281 bytes
gn24@prism.gatech.edu (Toonces) wrote: Bret Tonkin did what any (or most) home owners would have done, after repaeated violations to his house and privacy. It is this urgency in America to blame someone for someone elses mistakes. Those girls took a chance to vandelize someone's house. Whether they rolled one sheet or not is not an issue. They took a chance and paid for it with thier lives (sadly). Where were the girls parents ??? If you are going to blame someone, blame the parents. Mr. Tonkin is not a criminal....just a homeowner who was fed up with the vandelism to his house.
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads