RE: W4AQL SS Phone

Article View: git.radio.amateur

Article #8

From: Sherman Banks
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 1999 00:00

9 lines
1248 bytes

Excellent.  we should have done better on 40.  I think something is wrong
with the beam.  It should be checked out.  And 80 should be an excellent
band for us too.  We should look into installing a receive only antenna for
80.  10 was not so good for us - I'm not sure what the problem was. It may
have been conditions.  I'll have to take a look at some rate sheets from
other operators.

Hopefully W4ATC will have more busted call than us.  I think we did better
in that department than last year.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <LOBBJDDEKNJDEDBNKOFBCECBCCAA.w4atl@arrl.net>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <LPBBKICOAFCJHLBGEFONEEOICAAA.tim@cailloux.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f869f,91e905d6cb3956e1
X-Google-Attributes: gidf869f,public
From: w4atl@arrl.net (Sherman Banks)
Subject: RE: W4AQL SS Phone
Date: 1999/11/22
Message-ID: <LOBBJDDEKNJDEDBNKOFBCECBCCAA.w4atl@arrl.net>
X-Deja-AN: 551584417
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <LPBBKICOAFCJHLBGEFONEEOICAAA.tim@cailloux.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.gatech.edu
X-Trace: news-int.gatech.edu 943269765 10659 127.0.0.1 (22 Nov 1999 11:22:45 GMT)
Organization: Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta GA, USA
Mime-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: <w4atl@arrl.net>
NNTP-Posting-Date: 22 Nov 1999 11:22:45 GMT
Newsgroups: git.radio.amateur

Reply to Parent Message