Article View: gmu.local
Article #128Re: National Rifle Association (NRA) On Campus!
From: John_Johnson
Date: Thu, 01 May 1997 00:00
Date: Thu, 01 May 1997 00:00
95 lines
5183 bytes
5183 bytes
In <33686413.7132BB96@clark.net> klaatu <klaatu@clark.net> writes:
> Michael T Shinn wrote:
>>
>> John M Atkinson (jatkinso@ANTISPAMgmu.edu) wrote:
>> : If you want to argue that accepting Federal money makes a
>> : part-time force into a standing army, be my guest.
>>
>> We're just going to have to agree to disagree on this one. For
>> me at least, the one who signs the checks is the boss. And a
>> Federally funded standing is not my definition of a militia.
>> Thats my definition of an army.
>>
>> : % Aha - so its an army now? Sure there not in the same militia?
>> : % (Forget it, you made my point)
>>
>> : Negative. It is a Reserve of the United States Army _and_ a
>> : category of Militia. That's what dual role is.
>>
>> The Guard is not the Reserve. Its a standing army, be it a
>> federal army or a state army - but its still an army.
>
> Sorry, but the Guard is not full-time. That makes it a Reserve,
> and not a full-time Army.
In that case, the next time they call you up to report to
muster, just tell 'em "Hey; I'm not 'Full-Time' and it's not
YOUR time!"
You'll just LOVE Fort Leavenworth. <g> ;-)
> Actually, one of the functions of any militia would be the
> organizational aspects, even though for the unorganized militia,
> those organizational aspects are pretty much limited by "militia
> philosophy" to a particular county or neighborhood. The National
> Guard was and is the Organized Militia of a State. I am somewhat
> worried by the fact that it (along with the Coast Guard) is the
> primary source for rapid-mobilization personnel in times of war;
> I'd feel better if the National Guard/Coast Guard was the primary
> source only for in-country mobilization needs and not the first to
> be shipped out. _That_ aspect of the increasing Federalization of
> the NG/CG has me very worried indeed.
If it has the word "National" in its name, it's Federal; just
"organized" within the individual State (remember "Perpich?").
"National" can't be "the militia" of the 2nd Amnd., IMHO.
[Snip]
> --
> Be kind to your | When the going gets weird the weird turn pro.
> neighbors even though | http://www.clark.net/pub/klaatu/
> they be transgenic | Now. chock full of uninteresting links.
> chimerae. |-- Genesis 19:1-13 - Hebrews 13:2 --
> ------ � copr 1997 TJH Internet SP all rights reserved ------------
> Usually I work within the system when it's not trying to get me
> killed.
--John Johnson
"Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it."
--George Santayana, American Philosopher
"The further backward you look, the further forward you can see."
-- Winston Churchill
"It would...be strange to find in the midst of a catalog of the
rights of individuals a provision securing to the states the
right to maintain a designated 'Militia' -- and to find that
purely institutional guarantee accorded a position of great
prominence immediately following freedom of religion and freedom
of speech." (Italics in original)
--Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia
on the Second Amendment:
(A Matter of Interpretation: Federal
Courts and the Law, Princeton
University Press, 1997, 159 pages.)
--
From the computer of:
John_Johnson
TXJohn47@ix.netcom.com
The opinions expressed above represent those of the writer (me)
and not necessarily those of his employer (also me).
By US Code Title 47, Sec.227(a)(2)(B), a computer/modem/printer
meets the definition of a telephone fax machine. By Sec.227(b)(1)(C),
it is unlawful to send any unsolicited advertisement to such equipment.
By Sec.227(b)(3)(C), a violation of the aforementioned Section is
punishable by action to recover actual monetary loss, or $500,
whichever is greater, for each violation. All incoming unsolicited
commercial traffic will therefore be billed at a rate of $500 per msg
to compensate for loss of service.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<5kb6t2$om@dfw-ixnews6.ix.netcom.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<5k2tak$1pa@portal.gmu.edu> <3364f95a.6699868@news.gmu.edu> <5k2ugf$mos@portal.gmu.edu> <336505d4.9894542@news.gmu.edu> <5k36a5$ks3@portal.gmu.edu> <33651f16.16361883@news.gmu.edu> <5k3g8b$u8n@portal.gmu.edu> <33654557.26155875@news.gmu.edu> <5k532s$hav@portal.gmu.edu> <33686413.7132BB96@clark.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: 144807,2d4d4eb316566ec6 X-Google-Attributes: gid144807,public X-Google-Thread: 101049,2d4d4eb316566ec6 X-Google-Attributes: gid101049,public X-Google-Thread: 1044e7,2d4d4eb316566ec6 X-Google-Attributes: gid1044e7,public X-Google-Thread: fb785,2d4d4eb316566ec6 X-Google-Attributes: gidfb785,public From: TXJohn47@ix.netcom.com(John_Johnson) Subject: Re: National Rifle Association (NRA) On Campus! Date: 1997/05/01 Message-ID: <5kb6t2$om@dfw-ixnews6.ix.netcom.com> X-Deja-AN: 238752778 References: <5k2tak$1pa@portal.gmu.edu> <3364f95a.6699868@news.gmu.edu> <5k2ugf$mos@portal.gmu.edu> <336505d4.9894542@news.gmu.edu> <5k36a5$ks3@portal.gmu.edu> <33651f16.16361883@news.gmu.edu> <5k3g8b$u8n@portal.gmu.edu> <33654557.26155875@news.gmu.edu> <5k532s$hav@portal.gmu.edu> <33686413.7132BB96@clark.net> Organization: Netcom X-NETCOM-Date: Thu May 01 5:53:22 PM CDT 1997 Newsgroups: gmu.local,dc.general,va.general,talk.politics.guns