🚀 go-pugleaf

William Hughes wrote:
> 
> On Sun, 18 May 1997 01:07:30 -0400, klaatu <klaatu@clark.net> wrote:
> 
> >William Hughes wrote:
> >>
> >> On 15 May 1997 11:13:17 -0400, russotto@wanda.vf.pond.com (Matthew T. Russotto) wrote:
> >> >In article <3375e5d2.117550648@news2.cais.com>,
> >> >anonymous <anonymous@anonymous.com> wrote:
> 
> [troll and responses snipped]
> 
> >> And you notice that the coward posts anonymously, unlike you, me and Chris.
> >
> >Well, personally I post anonymously as well, though it's certainly not
> >at all difficult to find out who _I_ am.
> 
> Exactly. Plus, you have a valid email address. But how does one contact "anonymous@anonymous.com"?
> There's anonymous and there's completely out of touch. Your version of anonymity does not make you
> unreachable for verification and discussion; his does.

Yuppers. Plus his constant alias-switching combined with his useless
X*NO*Arch*ve ploy has made it a real bitch to drag his trolls up from
DejaNews  - he drops in and causes trouble and drops out and relies on
high turnover in this and other newsgroups to make his trolls seem new
and fresh. So I made a page just for Joe the Troll - it's at
http://www.clark.net/pub/klaatu/troll_aliases.html for anyone who wants
it. Basically, his technique is to troll to disrupt anyone discussing
issues regarding national sovereignity, border control,
right-to-keep-and-bear-arms, and in particular he's adamantly opposed to
anything that's against illegal immigration, or halting The Migration,
or disarming criminal foreign nationals who prey on US citizens. 

But he after all merely a troll, though particularly dangerous since he
does tend to troll in such a way that you _have_ to waste time and
energy refuting him point by point, or you have to go dig up citations,
etc - or did until I got that search-engine set-up going, and anyone who
wants can just go read his posts, see what he's up to, and in the future
simply disregard him with no cocnern for their own "face".


> 
> >Hmmm, funny, here I've been posting anonymously and standing up for the
> >Constitution and patriotism and other outmoded and unfashionable things,
> >and I've been getting a boatload of fallout in the "'hood" for it - and
> >Joe the Troll is probably posting anonymously to conceal the fact that
> >he's probably some sort of paid agent-provacateur.
> 
> Who's been hassling you for 'anonymous' posting? Or have I missed something somewhere?

Oy, vay, believe me you don't wanna know. E-mail me if you really do
want to know, I'll aim you at the right archives. Actually, you probably
_do_ wanna know. But for now I'll spare dc.general.

> 
> 

<sig snipped for bandwidth conservation...>

-- 
Be kind to your       | When the going gets weird the weird turn pro.
neighbors even though | http://www.clark.net/pub/klaatu/
they be transgenic    | Now. chock full of uninteresting links.
chimerae.             |-- $500.00 per-piece reading fee for SPAM.
------ � copr 1997 TJH Internet SP all rights reserved  ------------
Usually I work within the system when it's not trying to get me killed.