Article View: gnu.announce
Article #2583New poll on long options
From: Richard Stallman
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 1991 13:29
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 1991 13:29
39 lines
1671 bytes
1671 bytes
Please tell me which of these two syntaxes you prefer for long options:
`--' as a prefix, as in
ls --recursive --reverse
diff --context=2
`-=' as a prefix, as in
ls -=recursive -=reverse
diff -=context=2
Issues to consider:
* How easy is it to type each of these alternatives.
* How error-prone are they.
* How esthetically clean are they.
**Please don't reply to me.** Send your reply to
long-option-poll@gnu.ai.mit.edu.
Note that there is no conflict, strictly speaking, between the use of
`--' as a prefix for long options and use of `--' by itself as the
"end of options" marker. For example:
ls --format=long --directory -- --directory
is unambiguous: it makes a listing of the attributes of the directory
named `--directory'.
By the way, in evaluating the usefulness of long options, people
should keep in mind that they can be abbreviated:
ls --fo=l --d -- --directory
In the GNU system we will eventually have facilities for completion of
option names.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<9111142329.AA21815@mole.gnu.ai.mit.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!ieee.org!sdd.hp.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!gnu.ai.mit.edu!rmsShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fba7b,3024d7174f14d4e5,start X-Google-Attributes: gidfba7b,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1991-11-14 05:29:28 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!ieee.org!sdd.hp.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!gnu.ai.mit.edu!rms From: rms@gnu.ai.mit.edu (Richard Stallman) Newsgroups: gnu.announce Subject: New poll on long options Message-ID: <9111142329.AA21815@mole.gnu.ai.mit.edu> Date: 14 Nov 91 13:29:28 GMT Sender: gnulists@ai.mit.edu Reply-To: long-option-poll@gnu.ai.mit.edu Distribution: gnu Organization: GNUs Not Usenet Lines: 39 Approved: info-gnu@prep.ai.mit.edu