Article View: gnu.bash.bug
Article #1091Re: piping error output in Bash 1.04
From: Chet Ramey
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 1990 00:17
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 1990 00:17
24 lines
1330 bytes
1330 bytes
In article <5877@uhccux.uhcc.hawaii.edu> lupton@uhccux.uhcc.hawaii.edu (Robert Lupton) writes: > foo |& bar >I'd like to see this added, but Brian says that he's unconvinced. I see no >reason not to add it, although you can of course achieve the same thing >if you can remember where to put all of the &'s. As an ex-csh user, I'd >like the compatibilotyu and consistency. What do you think? It's so easy to do it with the regular bash features that I don't think the extra code is warranted: foo 2>&1 | bar I think csh compatibility should not be a goal. Bash is not csh; it's not even a csh clone. I think ksh compatibility should be a goal (the useful features of ksh, that is). Chet Ramey -- Chet Ramey Network Services Group "Help! Help! I'm being Case Western Reserve University repressed!" chet@ins.CWRU.Edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1990Jan3.001743.3636@usenet.ins.cwru.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!cwns1!chetReferences:
<5877@uhccux.uhcc.hawaii.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!cwns1!chet From: chet@cwns1.CWRU.EDU (Chet Ramey) Newsgroups: gnu.bash.bug Subject: Re: piping error output in Bash 1.04 Keywords: bash Message-ID: <1990Jan3.001743.3636@usenet.ins.cwru.edu> Date: 3 Jan 90 00:17:43 GMT References: <5877@uhccux.uhcc.hawaii.edu> Reply-To: chet@po.CWRU.Edu Organization: Case Western Reserve Univ. Cleveland, Ohio, (USA) Lines: 24