🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: gnu.bash.bug
Article #1111

flow control

#1111
From: Donn Cave
Date: Sat, 06 Jan 1990 20:52
21 lines
1293 bytes
I just put up bash 1.04 on several BSD mini/mainframes here, and it looks
good.  There was one thing I felt I had to do, however - Richard Stallman,
don't read this - I turned flow control back on.

(Specifically, I commented out about 6 lines in readline.c, starting
 with /temp.t_stopc = -1;/.)

It fixed some pretty serious problems with regular terminals, hooked up
on various configurations of RS232 and Ethernet, which basically couldn't
reliably handle the heavy line-editing load on something like autorepeating
\C-p.

Other than the loss of two editing control characters, does anyone see a
down side to this?

I still have a problem that crops up intermittenly on X11 xterm, where small
outputs (e.g., from pwd or jobs) get stuck somewhere before they get
to the screen.

			Donn Cave	UCS Software, University of Washington
			donn@milton.u.washington.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID: <9001062052.AA02439@milton.u.washington.edu>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!MILTON.U.WASHINGTON.EDU!donn

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!MILTON.U.WASHINGTON.EDU!donn
From: donn@MILTON.U.WASHINGTON.EDU (Donn Cave)
Newsgroups: gnu.bash.bug
Subject: flow control
Message-ID: <9001062052.AA02439@milton.u.washington.edu>
Date: 6 Jan 90 20:52:12 GMT
Sender: daemon@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu
Distribution: gnu
Organization: GNUs Not Usenet
Lines: 21