Article View: gnu.bash.bug
Article #1170Re: BASH and Bourne Shell scripts
From: Bill Trost,Box 607,ext 640,
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 1990 20:45
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 1990 20:45
10 lines
785 bytes
785 bytes
>If the system call exec () didn't exec the file, then >bash assumes that the file is a bash script. Not a bad assumption, and >in fact, the same assumption that /bin/sh makes. What, the Bourne shell assumes files are bash scripts when exec() fails? Nahhhh... :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) Just filling up the net....
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<14246@reed.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uakari!caesar.cs.montana.edu!ogicse!reed!trostReferences:
<376@peyote.cactus.org> <9002210515.AA12755@sbphy.Ucsb.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uakari!caesar.cs.montana.edu!ogicse!reed!trost From: trost@reed.bitnet (Bill Trost,Box 607,ext 640,) Newsgroups: gnu.bash.bug Subject: Re: BASH and Bourne Shell scripts Message-ID: <14246@reed.UUCP> Date: 23 Feb 90 20:45:13 GMT References: <376@peyote.cactus.org> <9002210515.AA12755@sbphy.Ucsb.EDU> Sender: news@reed.UUCP Distribution: gnu Lines: 10