🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: gnu.bash.bug
Article #346

bash & filenames

#346
From: Jamie Mazer
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 1989 01:16
12 lines
822 bytes
I dunno if this is really a bug.. But our system runs a
SYSV derived version of unix (masscomp RTU). Some of the the
filenames in the bash (1.01) distribution got are longer
that 14 chars, and are truncated on untaring.

While I would agree that 14 chars may be a crazy limit for
an operating system, some of us have no choice in the
matter..  So, any chance of keeping filenames shorter in
future releases?

Thanks,
/Jamie
Technical Details
Message-ID: <8907180116.AA05920@bek-owl.caltech.edu>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bek-owl.caltech.edu!mazer

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bek-owl.caltech.edu!mazer
From: mazer@bek-owl.caltech.edu (Jamie Mazer)
Newsgroups: gnu.bash.bug
Subject: bash & filenames
Message-ID: <8907180116.AA05920@bek-owl.caltech.edu>
Date: 18 Jul 89 01:16:22 GMT
Sender: daemon@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu
Distribution: gnu
Organization: GNUs Not Usenet
Lines: 12