Re: 1.04: setvbuf does not exist in Ultrix 2.0 -- with fix

Article View: gnu.bash.bug

Article #691

#691

From: Jordan K. Hubbard
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 1989 18:02

14 lines
1021 bytes

>There is a trivial fix.  Simply comment out the call.  This will
>result in a slightly less efficient stderr.  It certainly is not critical. 
>Patches follow:

No, don't do this. The correct thing to do is allocate your own
buffer and do a "setbuf()" call if you're on a VAX. Don't just
punt the entire concept.

					Jordan
--
			PCS Computer Systeme GmbH, Munich, West Germany
	UUCP:		pyramid!pcsbst!jkh jkh@meepmeep.pcs.com
	EUNET:		unido!pcsbst!jkh
	ARPA:		jkh@violet.berkeley.edu or hubbard@decwrl.dec.com

Technical Details

Message-ID: <JKH.89Nov10180241@meepmeep.pcs.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!watmath!uunet!mcsun!unido!pcsbst!jkh

References: <ANDREWT.89Nov7180233@watsnew.waterloo.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!watmath!uunet!mcsun!unido!pcsbst!jkh
From: jkh@meepmeep.pcs.com (Jordan K. Hubbard)
Newsgroups: gnu.bash.bug
Subject: Re: 1.04: setvbuf does not exist in Ultrix 2.0 -- with fix
Message-ID: <JKH.89Nov10180241@meepmeep.pcs.com>
Date: 10 Nov 89 18:02:41 GMT
References: <ANDREWT.89Nov7180233@watsnew.waterloo.edu>
Sender: news@pcsbst.UUCP
Organization: PCS Computer Systems, GmbH
Lines: 14
In-reply-to: andrewt@watsnew.waterloo.edu's message of 7 Nov 89 23:02:33 GMT

Reply to Parent Message